tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post3032086833069111791..comments2024-01-02T10:58:26.368+00:00Comments on Lancaster Unity: BNP in meltdown as Graham and Smith expulsions infuriate membershipAntifascisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13753277570496713369noreply@blogger.comBlogger76125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-7319283300949734222007-12-11T15:53:00.000+00:002007-12-11T15:53:00.000+00:00If Chris Hills not quitting that cannot surprise m...If Chris Hills not quitting that cannot surprise me. <BR/><BR/>Known him for ages and Hill's always been a bit of a low iq toady. Not my ideal choice of friend. <BR/><BR/>Good luck for the loser. Hope the fool enjoys the taste of humble pie when the spying rottweiler turns on him and bites his bollox. <BR/><BR/>Quitting or not Griffin will still always regard him as a traiter for hinting he was about to leave and will treat him as a fall guy at the earliest opportunity. Griffin is a vindictive bastard and is always looking to get his own back on his conspirators. <BR/><BR/>Griffin doesn't know the concept of loyalty<BR/><BR/>id rather eat my own poo than renew my membership.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-75580107115952880832007-12-11T15:41:00.000+00:002007-12-11T15:41:00.000+00:00There will always be sum cowards who remane with t...There will always be sum cowards who remane with the party and dont resign. <BR/><BR/>Some wussies stayed with the nf after griffin had messed them up just like hes now done with his fuckin bnp. <BR/><BR/>god help griffins lackeys if they had brains.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-18566565562928683462007-12-11T15:30:00.000+00:002007-12-11T15:30:00.000+00:00The bpp have a thriving social scene involving whi...The bpp have a thriving social scene involving white diamond cider orgies.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-19619561554003920442007-12-11T15:29:00.000+00:002007-12-11T15:29:00.000+00:00the worry is, some of them might join the bppthe worry is, some of them might join the bppAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-80924905711336182852007-12-11T15:22:00.000+00:002007-12-11T15:22:00.000+00:00'Might I suggest that LUAF keeps a close eye on th...'Might I suggest that LUAF keeps a close eye on this so that any incipient parties may be opposed at the earlist stage.'<BR/><BR/>Of course. Believe me, my eyes couldn't be closer. Er...<BR/><BR/>'Councillor Chris Beverly, Morley ward, Leeds, has just posted his resignation from the party. So I imagine that his wife will go from Morley PC.'<BR/><BR/>Well, well, well - they're falling like skittles. :-)Antifascisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13753277570496713369noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-40126676158775336422007-12-11T13:36:00.000+00:002007-12-11T13:36:00.000+00:00Quote.Councillor Chris Beverly, Morley ward, Leeds...Quote.<BR/>Councillor Chris Beverly, Morley ward, Leeds, has just posted his resignation from the party. So I imagine that his wife will go from Morley PC.<BR/><BR/>http://www.vote-2007.co.uk/index.php?topic=1843.15Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-51002272639245931702007-12-11T12:46:00.000+00:002007-12-11T12:46:00.000+00:00"There have been a number of comments made about a...<I>"There have been a number of comments made about a porn site, Pretty Clip, and a senior (named) member of the BNP - most of which could certainly get us done for libel"</I><BR/><BR/>Eh? Can a porn site proprioter sue for libel ? Still beeing associated with a facist must damage thier reputation !<BR/><BR/>Joking apart watching the BNP disintergrate may be fun but I am a little concerned where the organisors etc who have ability are going to end up ? Organising another bunch of facists, but without the destructive influence of Griffin ?<BR/><BR/>Might I suggest that LUAF keeps a close eye on this so that any incipient parties may be opposed at the earlist stage.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-49520018925810821052007-12-11T11:00:00.000+00:002007-12-11T11:00:00.000+00:00I'm putting this here because I believe it will ga...I'm putting this here because I believe it will gain a greater audience. <BR/><BR/>My thanks to DG, if it's allowed.<BR/><BR/>I have just this minute bothered to spend my own money on a tele call to BNP arsehole John Walker, initially to ask him what it felt like to have the rug pulled from underneath him and to be left high and dry. I couldn't resist quoting back to him what he once said to me. Anyway, he claims the BNP are about to stitch Graham up as being Special Branch and that his rug is firmly in position and that the announcement will halt the dissenters and put the BNP back on track.<BR/><BR/>I know BNP members are avid readers of this blog, so, be warned, the BNP are about to spew forth yet more poison to dupe you all.<BR/><BR/>Changing subject slightly, where are the BNP accounts?<BR/><BR/>Regards<BR/><BR/>S EbanksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-17944628756457173912007-12-11T10:46:00.000+00:002007-12-11T10:46:00.000+00:00good morning all, what a nice bright sunny day, on...good morning all, what a nice bright sunny day, on checking the bnp website this morning i see even more changes have been made overnight, and the "banner photo line up" has shrunk.<BR/>its a great shame that their site does not have a musical accompinient with it 10 green bottles would go down great.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-74654734008921983262007-12-11T09:48:00.000+00:002007-12-11T09:48:00.000+00:00SOME BLOG COMMENTS DELETED THAT YOU MAY BE INTERES...SOME BLOG COMMENTS DELETED THAT YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN.<BR/><BR/>Monday, 10 December 2007<BR/>Lancing a boil <BR/>Reluctantly I have been forced into thinking. Something I do not enjoy. So I went for a walk down to beach. And what did I see besides the sea?<BR/><BR/>Well first let me say that this post is not in anyway defending Collett and Co. I do not know enough about them but I do know what a rat smells like and I can smell one now.<BR/><BR/>I would like to thank Chris Hill for leaving the following comment on this site and prompting me into thinking. Sometimes you can overcook something Chris.<BR/><BR/>The taped phone conversation, released to support the expulsions, show that Sadie was attempting to collect the evidence needed to show, once and for all, that Mark Collett is indeed a millstone around the neck of every decent member of our party. This is how things should be done in a democratic party; (1) gather the evidence, (2) present the case to a disciplinary hearing, (3) let the accused hear the evidence and put forward a defence, (4) let the hearing come to a honest decision.<BR/><BR/>This is clearly the line Sadie was taking, but it is also just as clear that this due process of natural justice has been denied her. Sadie Graham and co are guilty of nothing except trying to save the party, and its members, from Mark Collett’s ego!<BR/><BR/>Collett must go.<BR/><BR/>From<BR/>Chris Hill<BR/>(Lancaster)<BR/><BR/>That comment is so obviously a load of nonsense, that at first I wondered if Chris had actually written it. But as he seems to have copied it to half the blogs around the world including the UAF, I must assume it is indeed his work. Feeding the UAF. Sad and deceitful.<BR/><BR/>So Sadie and Kenny were only doing right for the party by gathering information on Collett? Had they been simply doing that, then they would have no need to set up the enoughisenough blog. No they had a bigger fish to fry than Collett.<BR/><BR/>Now no traitor really wishes to be exposed for what they really are, so consider this. If this plot had not been nipped in the bud, then that blog and other blogs by the same creators would have been spouting part truths and lies right up to the Mayoral elections.<BR/><BR/>Comments would have been left around the blogs and forums by just a few people pretending to be many. And activists would be distracted and disheartened by their actions. Whilst they continued their charade of being loyal party members.<BR/><BR/>A daily drip of poison, whilst they pretended to support the Party but would actually have been poisoning it from within by the creation of discord and doubt amoungst the hard-working membership and British National Party officials.<BR/><BR/>But they knew what the results of their actions would be. If they really cared about Our Country and Our Party they would have waited until after the elections when the results would have been in and any in fighting not damaged our chances. But they did not wait. Why?<BR/><BR/>But they were caught red handed and so their little bomb has gone off. But it was never intended to go off this early. Like some crazed turnip suicide bomber who screws up, they were caught in the blast and were destroyed for ever as believable trustworthy people. OK so the blast has blown in a few of our BNP windows but they like the conspirators can be replaced.<BR/><BR/>But what their exposure has done is give a chance to all the closet traitors the chance to try and make more of it than it actually is and launch another leadership challenge. All ready some agitators are calling for a vote by the members.<BR/><BR/>In a way we should be grateful to them because this kind of boil needs lancing. And if there is to be any lancing then lets have it all done at the same time so wounds can heal quicker. If Collett and Co are just half as guilty as some say, then they to should either go or be reduced to the ranks and let them regain the trust of the membership that they do seem to have lost by sheer hard labour.<BR/><BR/>These people, if found guilty should be expelled and those who would find that difficult to live with should go with them.<BR/><BR/>Were we the party that people say we are, they would be hanging from meat hooks by now but fortunately for them we are not. But let the trial be fair and fast. We have work to do.<BR/><BR/>Check out this link here for a lesson on how not do things.<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>Tags: British National Party<BR/><BR/>Posted by The Green Arrow at 13:56 <BR/><BR/>Labels: British National Party <BR/><BR/><BR/>45 comments: <BR/>Anonymous said... <BR/>Well said GA! The sheer poison and criminal allegations tossed around like confetti today for all the world to see have left me in no doubt who to side with.<BR/>Its possible decent activists have been duped but I doubt it.<BR/>As you say, we have work to do. Griffin is a victim of his own success.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 14:14 <BR/>johnoddybnp said... <BR/>GA,<BR/>Good post.<BR/>I, like yourself, know little or nothing about the people involved in this monumental cock-up. We, as a party, elected our leadership let them lead.<BR/>The “ifs” and “buts” can only do us damage, let the powers that be make the decisions that they have to and then we’ll support those decisions like we have to!. This is not the time or the place to question, that time and place will come. then and only then. should we air our internal disagreements. The party decides who goes and who stays and the party will make that democratic decision but not now and certainly not here.<BR/>All we are doing now is giving the likes of “Louise” the best creamy knickers she’s ever had.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 14:29 <BR/>Aberdeen Patriot said... <BR/>green you are way off the mark how much do we need to reveal,,,,that we dont want to....<BR/><BR/>they have a hold over griffin <BR/><BR/>I was with Chris Hill at the conference, he is a cracking guy and a proud nationalist. He is also another one of the many members who want things done above board.<BR/><BR/>I have stated Ian Dawson, Kenny, Sadie and others going back 3 years have tried every means to rid the party of Collet and Hannam.<BR/>They have handed in dossiers, they have been through the EC, they have tried the discipline route. Griffin has even agreed they are right, but he still refuses to get rid of them. Why,,,<BR/><BR/>The good thing about you Green is that I know this will be hurting but trust that we are not trying to damage the BNP. Griffin knows this. These three are holding him to ransom and as a result they are doing what they want. Griffin cant take any action against them.<BR/><BR/>Look at who you are trying to label as traitors... Nah not me ,,, I just have enough guts to speak out,,,,Fuck I am a Scotsman for bleedin hell, we are not renowned for backing down in a fight.<BR/><BR/>I know when the truth comes out you will understand they are doing this. They just cant go on covering up for them any longer...<BR/><BR/>Please green be angry that this is happening I am and I will work even harder if Griffin gets rid of these three fools.....<BR/><BR/><BR/>But as an ex serviceman be honest can you work for two guys who were going to hump children, and have the personality to look down on all beneath them in the party. <BR/><BR/>Walker Collet and Hannam are scum...<BR/><BR/>Can so many of the hardest working members of the BNP be wrong.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 14:41 <BR/>Anonymous said... <BR/>Why do you still have links to traitor sites like Lancaster & Morecambe BNP?<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 14:51 <BR/>Reconquista said... <BR/>I think Lee John Barnes's entry on his blog entitled "War of the Muppets" hits the nail very firmly on the head.<BR/><BR/>It strikes me that those who are anti-collett put their own agendas before the interests of the party as a whole. That they may have ligitimate reasons against collett is not an excuse to undermine the party.<BR/><BR/>That they were prepared to do so indicates that they pledge loyalty when they get their way and remove it and undermine the party when they don't.<BR/><BR/>They've betrayed people who were working hard to spread the important message of the BNP and who knew nothing of this - people like myself - and I am very annoyed at the stupid actions taken by these fools that have handed our opponents a golden opportunity. <BR/><BR/>Here's a link to Lee's blog, he says exactly how I and many others feel about this:<BR/><BR/>http://www.leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/<BR/><BR/>Reconquista.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 15:58 <BR/>Paul said... <BR/>How times change. No one's happy unless they're baring their souls Jeremy Kyle style.<BR/>I cant believe you had no avenues but a malicious spoof blog or going ballistic on the internet.<BR/>Consider how many people are involved in this in the so called coup. No one sought legal advice or confided in trusted sources..GA for one? His credentials are impeccable. If you'd presented this info you say you have to a trusted third party especially a legal one your position would have been far better.<BR/>The fake blog is childish, have you never heard of tracking?<BR/>Kids can do it.<BR/>I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt in saying you've been misled into a no win situation, but you have thrown around the most damaging accusations.<BR/>Neither Kenny, Nicola or anyone else has said a word, they haven't had to, you and Mr Hill have said it all.<BR/>Loyal, or deeply misguided?<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 16:10 <BR/>Louise said... <BR/>Johnoddbnp: After a bit of digging around to see what all the fuss is about, how dare you bring knickers into this it is utterly inappropriate (dont you ever learn?). Whilst I am relieved that the party is falling apart in terms of the damage it does, I am completely horrified to read about the allegations of minors being involved with two key members of the BNP. If this is true, the complete and outrageous bare-faced hypocrisy of the BNP to be droaning on and on and on about prophets and minors is obvious. You have your right to freedom of speech (that you dont always allow others) and you enjoy your liberal rights like the rest of us in the UK. But when your most media happy thuglets are accused of taking advantage of young people you should at least have the good grace to keep your racist-hatred yappers shut! This is an incredibly bad example of how abusive behaviour is wrong, no matter who is doing it. In your morally high position and accusatory actions to ALL muslims, you have landed yourselves straight in the hot water. Lets see what everyone else in the country thinks.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 16:16 <BR/>Paul said... <BR/>Well thanks to the good AP and Anti Gag Louise that is exactly what will happen. Go have a look at requonista's link and see what you think. Barnes is a very good writer.<BR/>(avert your lovely eyes at the erotic goddess figurines above the post in question).<BR/><BR/>Sir; I will not have the nether garments of the woman I love discussed on this forum !<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 16:23 <BR/>Louise said... <BR/>Oh Oh Paul: Your veiled piss taking will not go down well here. Johnoddy-icantgetelected-bnp absolutely hates me (as demonstrated beautifully with his complete inability to come back with any decent arguments a few weeks ago). I tend not to look at Requonista's links owing to the overly emotional content of the postings. However, I may relent on this occassion. Since you recommend it.<BR/><BR/>By the way: The public airing of these issues is not actually bad per se. Its better and braver to have these debates in the open. The part that makes it embarrasing is the nature of the issues. I always said that Collet was a loose cannon - and not a very bright one at that.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 16:35 <BR/>Anti-gag said... <BR/>I have not posted on the Lancaster UAF site for about a year now, I can't my ISP address is blocked. <BR/><BR/>Any posts on that site are quotes from other postings I have made on other blogs.<BR/><BR/>From<BR/>Chris Hill<BR/>(Lancaster)<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 16:55 <BR/>Anonymous said... <BR/>Although I'm not very often in agreement with Chris Hill, on this occassion I do think he has a point. As a former fund holder I found Dave Hannan absolutely useless, I don't know Mark Collett but I am told by friends he is a spiv.<BR/><BR/>The BNP seems to be too concentrated in the North, here in the south we hear everything third hand.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:04 <BR/>Reconquista said... <BR/>Trollousie<BR/><BR/>You really are a snidey, devious little reptile aren't you? A keyboard activist, someone with no life unless it involves sniping.<BR/><BR/>You go on about these accusations as if they validate your somewhat odious position regarding child abuse. Because you're the kind of low life who tolerates the legal abuse of children mandated in sharia - so long as it doesn't apply to your children that is.<BR/><BR/>You amd what you defend is an affront to humanity. Don't try to hide behind this regretful episide to camoflage your own corrupt beliefs and double standards.<BR/><BR/>Beliefs and double standards that carry the most fetid stench.<BR/><BR/>Reconquista.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:07 <BR/>Antifascist said... <BR/>'I have not posted on the Lancaster UAF site for about a year now, I can't my ISP address is blocked.'<BR/><BR/>Tut-tut. What a liar. Your IP has never been blocked on the current Lancaster UAF blog.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:10 <BR/>What a bloody day said... <BR/>Uselessness and spivvery would see Parliament emptied and most of the public service quango's too.<BR/>Its not a crime to be a useless spiv, neither is comning out and accusing a wrong 'un of being a wrong 'un but this is a coup for taking over the party and forcing a Leader to follow the agenda of the plotters.<BR/>It truly was the muppet show (Lee Barnes)<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:12 <BR/>Louise said... <BR/>Reconquista: As usual, you are utterly wrong (and yes, I did suspect your usual over emotional rants would come back to me - why dont you do as GA suggests and ignore me and then we will all be happier).<BR/><BR/>My only position on child abuse is this:<BR/><BR/>Dont do it! <BR/><BR/>It is wrong. <BR/><BR/>Now, if thats odious to you, so be it. <BR/><BR/>However, I have another position about child abuse too. One that I shall share with you. <BR/><BR/>If you spout off about others and acuse them of child abuse, for goodness sake, make sure that no one in your own ranks is potentially involved in it too! <BR/><BR/>I am a humanitarian by nature and by deed. I protect and uphold the declaration of human rights. The beauty of an army of one with regards to being anti-extreme positions (eg BNP) is that you get to be accountable and responsible for anything you say or do. If you know that your political actions are pure, you dont hurt anyone. If you make mistakes with an army of one, you have to stand up and admit them right away. Its so much easier than being part of a racist emotional overflow of panic and fear like you are. Now then, a lot of people have been hurt here precisely because of the nature of the people your party attracts. Dont give me opportunity to rub your nose in it because you have no come back to this current mess in your party. And Reconquista, that aint my fault.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:15 <BR/>Paul said... <BR/>Hi antfascist, how's your server coping? Meltdown eh?<BR/>I bet you've never had so much of the "Nationalist activists" cluttering up your boards before.<BR/>I recognised a few old names over there. Very old and mostly bitter for the old days before success.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:17 <BR/>Anonymous said... <BR/>Ketlan:You're priceless!!!You would'nt know the truth if it stole your welfare cheque from right under your nose...This just gets better.<BR/><BR/>orion<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:23 <BR/>Anonymous said... <BR/>Those that do stupid things and then who get caught and then demand that people follow them deserve no loyalty - primarily as they were stupid enough to do it in the first pace, stupid enough to get caught and then stupid enough to incite others to follow their stupidity.<BR/><BR/>Regardless of the righteousness of a cause, once you have been caught doing something stupid in pursuit of that cause then you cannot plead for forgiveness on the grounds that you were doing wrong in the name of right. <BR/><BR/>Those who say 'we did this for the benefit of the cause', reveal their true nature when they refuse to admit what they did was wrong and stupid and then incite others to do even more stupid things. <BR/><BR/>Loyalty ends when stupidity is compounded by inciting others into disloyalty.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:30 <BR/>Yorkielass said... <BR/>NOW TAKE A LESSON FROM THE BBC, NOTICE HOW LABOUR CORRUPTION HAS NOW BEEN OVERLOOKED BY SOME GUY THAT DID BUGGER ALL IN COMPARRISON?<BR/>SARWAR'S SON ALREADY IN PRISON FOR MONEYLAUNDERING.<BR/>GET BACK TO FIGHTING THIS CORRUPT GOV AND NOT TITILLATING THE ENEMY!<BR/>WHAT ARE MUSLIMS PAYING FOR?<BR/>THE TIMES.<BR/>Muslim lobby group hid identity of Labour donorHolly Watt and Jonathan Calvert <BR/>ONE of Labour’s biggest donors was able secretly to channel more than £300,000 into the party’s election funds through an Islamic lobby group that hid his identity. <BR/><BR/>Inquiries by The Sunday Times have established that Imran Khand, a 43-year-old computer entrepreneur, was behind three large donations to the party earlier this year. <BR/><BR/>But his name was never disclosed to the Electoral Commission, which regulates party funding, because the money was given in the name of Muslim Friends of Labour, a lobby group. <BR/><BR/>Separately, Harriet Harman’s deputy leadership campaign registered a £5,000 donation from Muslim Friends, when the cash was almost entirely from Moham-mad Sarwar, the Labour MP who runs the group. <BR/><BR/><BR/>Q&A: secret donor scandal <BR/>Our Political Correspondent analyses the origins of the secret donor sleaze row and its potential implications <BR/><BR/>Timeline: Labour's secret donor row <BR/>Multimedia<BR/>Video: Brown under fire in Parliament<BR/>Pictures: Labour funding row - key players<BR/><BR/>Background<BR/>A walking paradox who gave £600,000 <BR/>Brown is made to play the fool in stage farce <BR/>Jack Dromey declares he is victim of concealment <BR/>The disclosures are likely to intensify the row over Labour’s secret donors. Police are already investigating how David Abrahams, a property developer, was able to hide his name by giving more than £600,000 through intermediaries. <BR/><BR/>Under laws introduced by Labour the names of donors to political parties should be declared so that they can be placed on a public register by the Electoral Commission. <BR/><BR/>Donors to Muslim Friends were not declared because the group exploits rules that allow groups with large numbers of small donors (such as trade unions) to give under the umbrella of a single association. <BR/><BR/>However, figures obtained this weekend show that Muslim Friends does not have a large number of donors. <BR/><BR/>On the contrary, it appears to be mostly a front for just one man, Khand. He provided at least 96% of the money given to the party through the group this year. <BR/><BR/>Yesterday, David Davies, the Conservative MP for Mon-mouth, called for an inquiry into the donations. He said: “If virtually all the money from this group was actually coming from one person, then it is not transparent. We need a full investigation into who this person is, why he gave all this money and why his name was kept off the Electoral Commission register.” <BR/><BR/>The donations are thought to be legal as the group was using the loophole of “association” status. This has been recently changed so they now have to declare their donors. <BR/><BR/>Muslim Friends of Labour uses a post office box in London but is run by Sarwar from Glasgow. When this newspaper revealed claims earlier this year that Khand was one of the group’s backers, Sarwar was reluctant to reveal how much he and others had given. <BR/><BR/>However, in the wake of the latest Labour donor crisis, Sarwar agreed to give a detailed breakdown of the group’s funders for the first time. <BR/><BR/>It gave a total of £312,000 to the party this year. Sarwar says Khand gave “more than £300,000”, which would account for the three £100,000 donations in spring before the Scottish elections in May. <BR/><BR/>Khand built up the Glasgow firm Picsel Technologies into a business producing software for mobile phones. He declined to comment this weekend. <BR/><BR/>The rest of Muslim Friends’ funding was made up of £4,000 from Sarwar and £6,000 from Maq Rasul, whose chain of Global DVD rental shops folded earlier this year. A dinner attended by Scottish Labour politicians raised £5,500. <BR/><BR/>Sarwar also gave £5,000 to Harman’s deputy leadership campaign, registered as a gift from Muslim Friends. <BR/><BR/>But he admitted that most of that money had come from his own pocket. He said: “I promised her campaign team that I would raise £5,000; I made a commitment. Strictly speaking, £4,500 came from me and £500 came from the [Muslim Friends] account.” <BR/><BR/>He revealed he didn’t tell Harman’s team the money was from Muslim Friends when he made the pledge but he used a cheque from the group to send it. <BR/><BR/>Harman’s team, which was also criticised for accepting cash from an Abrahams intermediary, dropped the PO Box address when registering the gift and instead used Sarwar’s home. <BR/><BR/>The details about Muslim Friends’ backers are likely to embarrass Labour. The party attempted last week to deflect the row over Abrahams by attacking the Tories for receiving cash through a similar association, the Midlands Industrial Council. <BR/><BR/>Jack Straw, the justice secretary, said associations such as the Midlands Industrial Council have been “used, albeit lawfully, as a means of avoiding disclosing the identity of the original donors”. He made no mention of Muslim Friends of Labour.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:31 <BR/>Lamedon said... <BR/>Green Arrow,<BR/><BR/>the problem with the current crisis is in the fact that in case you allow Collet & co. to continue you will run into another crisis in the rather near future.<BR/><BR/>Too many people have been barred from your party only for having a dispute with the people who are apparently above any rule binding otherwise party members ("window" incident is only the last example). Your Sedgefield candidate resigned because of having an argument with them.<BR/><BR/>You are loosing too many activists and sympathizers only for keeping a "Nazi-poster" guy in prominent position within party.<BR/><BR/>BNP is now almost in Apollo 13 situation. Too many outcasts is moving in very proximity of the mother ship posing a risk of a fatal collision.<BR/><BR/>You must fix the problems now otherwise you will fade out amidst various internal crisis ...<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:33 <BR/>Anonymous said... <BR/>"Reluctantly I have been forced into thinking. Something I do not enjoy."<BR/><BR/>How very sad.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:33 <BR/>Reconquista said... <BR/>Trollouise<BR/><BR/>If people abuse they should be unreservedly condemned and punished no matter who they are. <BR/><BR/>But you don't do you? You can't wait to smear the BNP but at the same time you tolerate a belief system that by law allows children to be abused. That you don't absue is irrelevant. You condone it with your lickspittle tolerance because of your own personal version of la-la land, the multicultural eutopia.<BR/><BR/>Unless it's your own children of course then no doubt you'd be against it. That's why you're are a despicable, snidey hypocrite. You're here gloating about this incident but you're wholly blind to your own hypocrisy. And this incident neither validates your smearing of the BNP nor masks your advocation of child abuse.<BR/><BR/>Panic and fear of Islam? No I have a far deeper understanding of Islam and sharia than you do. As for fear, never that's why I support the BNP and it's fight to get rid of this vile dogma that gives men the right to absue women and children by law. <BR/><BR/>Not that you'd care about such a trivial thing as sharia law.<BR/><BR/>Reconquista.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:41 <BR/>Antifascist said... <BR/>'Hi antfascist, how's your server coping? Meltdown eh?'<BR/><BR/>My server's fine thanks. Google's server might be getting a little warm.<BR/><BR/>'Ketlan:You're priceless!!!You would'nt know the truth if it stole your welfare cheque from right under your nose...This just gets better.'<BR/><BR/>Get a grip son. You don't know what you're talking about. There's is NO blocking any IP from any blog site based on Google's servers unless Google chooses to do it. Idiot.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:49 <BR/>Louise said... <BR/>Reconquista:<BR/><BR/>I am afraid that in your speed to condem me for enjoying my interactions with muslims (that have not cut off my head or tried to abuse my children or their children), you have misunderstood what I have been saying. How you have misunderstood is beyond me, but you have. So lets clear a couple of things up so that you can get your facts right and show some balance in your incorrect emotional-ranto-fests.<BR/><BR/>I have always said that abuse is wrong. I am saying it again. I am also therefore saying that abuse OF anyone BY anyone is wrong. It matters not to me who the abuser is (eg colour, ethnicity, religion, age, etc), its wrong! How does that make me a hypocrite? It doesnt. And you know it but rather than admit defeat, you are going to get incredibly angry because thats what you do well. So lets be havin' yer!<BR/><BR/>Your position of your anger on my doorstep is futile. Because I DO know what i believe in and Because I CAN remember what my position is and because I DO practice what I preach, I know that you can provide me with no evidence in any posts which suggests that i justify abuse of children. None whatsoever. <BR/><BR/>I will refer to my earlier comments. Why dont you focus on the reasons that your high-up members of the BNP have been accussed of sexual involvement with minors. Do the allegations hold up and what is being done about them? Dont deflect your BNP filth onto me. Deal with it! You are attacting negative attention now. Smarten up Reconquista!<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 17:56 <BR/>Reconquista said... <BR/>Trollouise<BR/><BR/>Your views are ridicuously inconsistent and you have by your own words, proven my accusation against you: <BR/><BR/>(that have not cut off my head or tried to abuse my children or their children)<BR/><BR/>That is my whole point about you. It isn't your kids or your group so you think it's ok to tolerate Islam and sharia. The fact that Islamic sharia advocates the marrying of kids at 9 and that women can be beaten doesn't matter to you. Nor does it matter to you that others in all Islamic countries - and now in Europe and the UK - are being absued and beaten and beheaded under a doctrine you tolerate doesn't matter to you.<BR/><BR/>That's why you give your assent to absue and that's why you're a hypocrite who is blind to your own self-centred stupidity.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for showing everyone on here how you think - it has been most enlightening.<BR/><BR/>"If it's not on my doorstep it's fine by me" - what a humanitarian you are. <BR/><BR/>It's been my pleasure to humiliate you, now to hell with you and your hypocrisy.<BR/><BR/>Reconquista.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 18:11 <BR/>Sir HM said... <BR/>"I am also therefore saying that abuse OF anyone BY anyone is wrong. It matters not to me who the abuser is (eg colour, ethnicity, religion, age, etc), its wrong! How does that make me a hypocrite? "<BR/><BR/>And all of we native British people who are being abused by the current political, economic and social system?<BR/><BR/>Or don't we count?<BR/><BR/>It seems you're saying too that only a few Muslims are lunatics. And how many Germans were lunatics in the 1930s? Didn't stop the Nazis implementing their program did it. How are the Muslims you know going to stop the lunatics implementing THEIR program?<BR/><BR/>Louise?<BR/><BR/>PS It's obviously not lack of time that stops you addresing the issues I raised on the other thread, because you're finding plenty of time for this thread.<BR/><BR/>Could it be that you know full well that everything I say on the other thread is correct, so you'd rather ignore it so that you can be comfortable in your cocoon of Denial?<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 18:23 <BR/>Captain Swing said... <BR/>I see the Wankaster Unite Against Freedom amoeba, Dildo Gobshite (aka "Louise"/Anon) and her sub-bitch, Caitlin Tosserofski, are desperately trying to make capital out of the removal of malcontents from the BNP. Well, I wouldn't crow too loudly if I was them - plod has already got its sights set on the dodgy dealings of the UAF - won't be long before collars are being well and truly felt, if my (very good) sources are correct.<BR/><BR/>Go back and hide in the slime where you belong, red-fascist losers!<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 18:26 <BR/>Louise said... <BR/>Again Reconquista<BR/><BR/>So quick! So brash! So stupid! <BR/><BR/>I am going to repeat this becuase you appear not to be getting it. Why you are not getting it is beyond me but here we go (again):<BR/><BR/>Abuse OF anyone BY anyone is wrong.<BR/><BR/>GA's blog has a leader-line about a future for our children. The BNP website and policies and manifesto has similar statements. I was using the term in a scarcastic sense precisely because people have previously said things like 'well if it was your kids they were abusing' or 'muslims will chop off our heads' and so on. My scarcasm was to state that no, that had never happened and wasnt going to happen. The difference being of course is that muslims have not abused "our" children and yet Collet and co are now being accused of involvement with children. <BR/><BR/>The other readers on here already have a negative opinion of me Reconquista. A dislike for me is the default position, silly! Equally, the other readers dont particularly need you to patronise them into your pathetic eureka moment of insecurity by exposing me. If you are trying out your martydom here, I suggest you practice it elsewhere because I have never said that abuse is correct or justified or my children, your children or anyone else's children. If you think I have, quote me directly with dates and times. And no, calling to stop racism against muslims is not indrect justification of abuse so dont even go there. If a muslim abuses their child, its as wrong for them as for anyone else so dont try that line either!<BR/><BR/>In conclusion: read my comments more carefully OR ignore them totally but dont use them as a cheap way to try to look clever because you keep on failing to do so. And dont tell me what matters to me and what doesnt. Remember that it was I who urged you into a position of humanitarianism, not the other way around. Likewise, I am not a racist (whereas you are) and in my army of one, I dont go into hotel rooms with other peoples children (your party players did this is worsened by the moral high ground you take on this issue). It was I that asked on this blog not to receive sexualised comments based at me and it was i who raised the issue that domestic violence in the UK is way out of control. You may use this opportunity to deflect your anger at me or tell racist jokes against muslims. Sooner or later you will have to educate yourself, and NOT lump all muslims under one category or 'evil'.<BR/><BR/>10 December 2007 18:40Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-68304599636154865472007-12-11T09:04:00.000+00:002007-12-11T09:04:00.000+00:00Let us not underestimate Sadie Graham. A BNP run b...Let us not underestimate Sadie Graham. A BNP run by her might be less scandal ridden and chaotic than under Griffin.Why has she only recently discovered that her close colleagues of many years are rogues? Let us prepare to deal with a more difficult opponent than the Collet style loonies.davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05929505935816317535noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-37984369940451127082007-12-11T08:17:00.000+00:002007-12-11T08:17:00.000+00:00Chris Hill has obviously lost his bottle. He's pos...Chris Hill has obviously lost his bottle. He's posted this on his site.<BR/><BR/>"Comments on other blogs, to the affect that I have resigned, are totally wrong. Like most members I'll be standing and fighting for the party I've come to see as the only chance our Nation has."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-86899050219394207792007-12-11T07:41:00.000+00:002007-12-11T07:41:00.000+00:00There have been a number of comments made about a ...There have been a number of comments made about a porn site, Pretty Clip, and a senior (named) member of the BNP - most of which could certainly get us done for libel. I'm of the opinion that this is a deliberate sabotage attempt but if the commentors have <B>solid</B> evidence of this connection, we'd appreciate it if it could be sent in via email so we could make sure it was usable.Antifascisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13753277570496713369noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-85251584982132861192007-12-11T02:50:00.000+00:002007-12-11T02:50:00.000+00:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-70062865183096765972007-12-11T02:40:00.000+00:002007-12-11T02:40:00.000+00:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-90259288321113595952007-12-11T02:36:00.000+00:002007-12-11T02:36:00.000+00:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-34398239341293758402007-12-11T02:33:00.000+00:002007-12-11T02:33:00.000+00:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-11189129784727593262007-12-11T01:26:00.000+00:002007-12-11T01:26:00.000+00:00Those who remain in the bnp are cowards and asslic...Those who remain in the bnp are cowards and asslickersAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-84874177920606109042007-12-11T01:02:00.000+00:002007-12-11T01:02:00.000+00:00It's going to be interesting to see how the BNP co...It's going to be interesting to see how the BNP come back from this one.<BR/><BR/>This list of people stepping down or resigning their posts is growing by the hour.<BR/><BR/>Brian Riley (Glasgow Organiser)<BR/>Charlie Baillie (Glasgow Fundholder)<BR/>Chris Hill (Lancaster & Preston Organiser)<BR/>Cllr Dave Brown (Broxtowe)<BR/>Cllr Nina Brown (East Mids Regional Secretary & Broxtowe Organiser)<BR/>Cllr Roger Robertson (South East Regional Organiser & Advisory Council Member)<BR/>Cllr Sadie Graham (Head of Group Development & East Mids Regional Organiser & Advisory Council Member)<BR/>Danny Lake (YBNP Leader)<BR/>Dave Taylor (Bradford Contact)<BR/>Ian Dawson (Yorkshire Regional Secretary, Former Head of Group Support & Advisory Council Member)<BR/>Kenny Smith (Head of Administration & Scottish Regional Organiser & Advisory Council Member)<BR/>Kieran Dinsmore (Ulster Regional Organiser)<BR/>Mark Wain (Melton & Rutland Press Officer)<BR/>Matt Single (Department of Security Secretary & Training Officer)<BR/>Neil Craig (Bradford Organiser)<BR/>Nicholla Smith (Managing Director of Excalibur & Falkirk Organiser & Advisory Council Member)<BR/>Sammy Shaw (Falkirk Fundholder)<BR/>Scott McLean (Former Deputy Chairman & Scottish Regional Organiser & Advisory Council Member)<BR/>Steve Blake (Web Editor & Head of Education & Training & Advisory Council Member)<BR/>Steve Thomson (Aberdeen Organiser)<BR/><BR/>Great stuff, I think this is going to do the damage to the BNP that the NNP were incapable of doing due to credibility issues. Just need a few more big hitters to resign to increase the pressure and then hopefully the house of cards will fallJohn Phttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12892206893738671826noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-85458682809094823862007-12-11T00:47:00.000+00:002007-12-11T00:47:00.000+00:00@ Dan TAPMWe should pay him and that gullible twer...@ Dan TAPM<BR/><BR/>We should pay him and that gullible twerp Brighton Rock for all the free publicity.<BR/><BR/>And so ends another day in the BNP's unstoppable march to power...Denisehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03949949601646281083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-53202765668761840462007-12-11T00:43:00.000+00:002007-12-11T00:43:00.000+00:00what's Lee Barne's user name over there?what's Lee Barne's user name over there?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-41060792956530681742007-12-11T00:30:00.000+00:002007-12-11T00:30:00.000+00:00You're so gullible, Mark Twain!You're so gullible, Mark Twain!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-65728642805373517712007-12-11T00:19:00.000+00:002007-12-11T00:19:00.000+00:00Stormfront's real fun tonight. They're really piss...Stormfront's real fun tonight. They're really pissed about KO and DG, plenty of actionable comments from Lee Barnes. Way to go, LUAF!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-347614293898812182007-12-10T23:57:00.000+00:002007-12-10T23:57:00.000+00:00Griffin's Taking The Piss said... Your local branc...<B><A>Griffin's Taking The Piss</B></A> <I>said... <BR/><BR/>Your local branch will pass on all funds to central accounting, i.e., Griffin's fat wallet. <BR/><BR/>One ship, one captain, sailor!!!</I><BR/><BR/>Haha, seriously, they won't!Mark Wainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00662935647793318597noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3547542464688328490.post-24016776317707907362007-12-10T22:27:00.000+00:002007-12-10T22:27:00.000+00:00If you were a part-time dissident staying put in t...If you were a part-time dissident staying put in the ranks of the bnp because you haven't the balls to say "fuck you" to your Fuhrer, when your "change things from the inside" protest hits the buffers, and the time has come to pledge your undying love to your hallowed leaders, which backside will you willingly insert your tongue? <BR/><BR/>Greasy Griffin's hairy arse or Psychotic Collett's whiffy butt cheeks? <BR/><BR/>Answers on a postcard, my spineless friends.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com