Newspapers warned of consequences of accepting political ads in the election
Editors of local newspapers in London boroughs targeted by the BNP have been called on to reject political advertising by the far-right party. The National Union of Journalists (NUJ), Bectu, the media and entertainment union, and the campaign group, Expose the BNP, have written to local newspapers in Barking and Dagenham, Romford and Havering urging them to resist pressure from the BNP. The party is fielding 154 candidates at the general election.
In 2008, Archant London, one of the country's biggest media groups, caused outrage after it printed BNP adverts for the Greater London Authority elections in its London newspapers, including the Ham & High and Hackney Gazette.
Jeremy Dear, general secretary of the NUJ, said: "Newspapers should not take money from an organisation that advocates racist policies that would directly discriminate against the communities they serve. Publishing ads from far-right organisations seriously threatens the reputation of a company's titles and journalists."
Alexandra Fawcett, a media lawyer at Mishcon de Reya, said: "Newspapers are entitled to publish or reject adverts as they see fit. In deciding whether to run the BNP's adverts, each paper will weigh the financial benefit of publishing against the likely reputational damage of associating their brand with an organisation like the BNP. As a private company, a paper's decision isn't open to challenge under the Human Rights Act even though refusing to run the adverts might impact on the BNP's right to free speech."
Mary Brodbin, of Expose the BNP, observed: "The BNP is not a normal, respectable or legitimate political party –- it is an organisation that aims to disenfranchise a significant section of British society, and it encourages violence to achieve those ends. No newspaper can afford to be associated with the BNP and its methods."
A spokesman at the Board of Deputies praised the campaign and said: "The BNP are entitled to peddle their twisted ideology just as newspaper editors and the NUJ are entitled to contribute to the fight against them by seeking to curtail their advertising campaigns. The NUJ is to be congratulated for its principled stance."
The Board is urging communities to "support any party of their choice which stands opposed to the destructive politics of hatred, to vote for freedom not fear, partnerships not prejudice, and hope not hate".
A spokesman for the BNP said that the appeal was "disgraceful" and an "outrageous" attempt to "silence free speech".
Jewish Chronicle
Good to see the unions generally waking up a bit with regard to the nazzers. More power to them.
ReplyDelete"As a private company, a paper's decision isn't open to challenge under the Human Rights Act even though refusing to run the adverts might impact on the BNP's right to free speech." BNP propaganda has succeeded in influencing people - people like even the lawyer who made this comment, by influencing their perception of "free speech".
ReplyDeleteYes people ARE free to say what they like (as long as they're not (so-to-speak) shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theatre (which unfortunately right-wing propaganda often does), and people are also free NOT to have anyone they don't like using their homes, their workplaces, their spaces, their resources, their publications etc to spout views they don't agree with!
Nick Griffin is free to plant his flag-pole on his OWN roof, but the principle of free speech does not mean that I should be legally obliged to allow the BNP to come round to my house and place their posters in my window. Surely that's just common sense.
By the same logic all newspapers should be free NOT to run BNP adverts - if by any chance they respect their readers enough not to want to be seen making money promoting a group even BNP star Alby Walker admitted is riddled with Nazis.
http://www.archant.co.uk/