Showing posts with label BNP lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BNP lies. Show all posts

May 19, 2009

Hero's fury at BNP 'fake' pic

10 Comment (s)
More lies and bullshit from the BNP
An ex-Guardsman branded the BNP “scumbags” last night for using his photo and faked words on an election flyer.

Former Scots Guards NCO Stuart Walker, 37, was shocked to see a picture of himself in uniform outside Buckingham Palace on a poll leaflet. Beside it, implying he would back the racist party in the Euro elections, were words criticising kit shortages and soldiers being “abused” by Muslims.

Stuart, who left the Army in 1997, first knew about it when it dropped through a relative’s letterbox. The dad-of-two, now a corporate manager in London, said he rang the BNP’s offices to complain and was told to “f*** off”.

He told The Sun: “I was completely outraged when I saw this leaflet. I think they got the photo off a website and the quote they’ve made up. They are scumbags and I’d never vote for them in a million years.”

The BNP is also reported to have used shots of US actors and Italian OAPs to represent British voters.

Sun

February 01, 2009

Far right tries to hijack dispute

3 Comment (s)
Striking energy workers were last night warned to be vigilant against far right groups looking to hijack their protest.

The TUC issued the advice after evidence came to light that groups such as the British National Party had approached unemployed construction workers protesting against a contract awarded to an Italian firm. But Scottish union representatives insisted the campaign was a fight for jobs rather than an attack on the foreign workers.

Contract workers across the UK are demonstrating against the practice by foreign companies of undercutting British firms by bidding for contracts below agreed prices. The protest originated at the Lindsey Oil Refinery, in North Lincolnshire, on Wednesday after a major contract was awarded to Italian firm IREM, which plans to staff the job with Italian and Portuguese workers.

Some unemployed workers took the opportunity to challenge Prime Minister Gordon Brown's 2007 promise of "British jobs for British workers".

TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber spoke out against attempts to hijack the action, after evidence emerged that activists from the BNP and other far-right factions attempted to influence strikers around the country. He said: "Unions are clear that the anger should be directed at employers, not the Italian workers. No doubt some of the more distasteful elements in our towns and cities will try to use the fears of workers to stir up hatred and xenophobia.

"But I am confident that union members will direct their anger at the employers who have caused this dispute with their apparent attempt to undercut the wages, conditions and union representation of existing staff."

Bobby Buirds is regional officer for Unite trade union in Grangemouth, where some workers have staged wildcat strikes in sympathy with the Lindsey workers. He said: "The argument is not against foreign workers, it's against foreign companies discriminating against British labour. This is a fight for work. It is not a racist argument at all."

Writing on the BNP website, Nick Griffin said that Unite's claims that this was not a racist issue were "ridiculous".

The Scotsman

November 05, 2008

UKIP egg on Griffin's face

7 Comment (s)
It's an odd state of affairs when the BNP feels driven to go sneaking through the back door of the UKIP to make Britain's main anti-EU party an offer it can refuse - especially as the BNP has long held that the UKIP is a state-run "false flag" operation brought into existence with the specific intention of taking away the BNP's support.

Something of a storm in a thimble, news that UKIP's Nigel Farage humiliatingly rebuffed the BNP's offer of an electoral pact that would see each party stand down in electoral regions where the other had the better chance was not likely to play well to a BNP audience poring over an almost uniformly gloomy sequence of recent by-election results, and hardly set the tone for this year's looming BNP annual conference.

It simply wouldn't do for Nick Griffin to be seen with the UKIP's egg on his face, and so a quick and dirty rescue operation has been mounted to turn public indignity into apparent success.

We have no reason at all to doubt an angered Nigel Farage's version of events: namely that Buster Mottram (ex-National Front, failed Great White Hope of British lawn tennis) "gatecrashed" a meeting of UKIP's National Executive Council, relayed Nick Griffin's proposals to the bemused party leadership, was cold-shouldered and ordered to leave, which he eventually did with police assistance.

Farage wasted no time in making the matter public, causing much wailing and gnashing of teeth in BNP-land, since the racist party had been unceremoniously rejected by the one organisation it loathes more than Al-Qaida.

That it was the BNP which approached the UKIP, and not members of UKIP who approached the BNP, is amply confirmed by deputy-leader and budding rubber magnate Simon Darby, who told the Press Association:

"It was with a view to ending this ridiculous situation of splitting the anti-Euro federalist vote and it hasn't paid off, frankly. We are aware there are people very highly placed in Ukip who are very sympathetic to the logic that the vote could be split - that was where we were coming from. Someone has to take a lead on this if we are not to continue to be propelled into this federalist monster."

There is nothing in Darby's statement which indicates that anybody at all in UKIP made the first move, as the BNP now claims.

Rather, because the BNP proposal involved allowing the BNP free rein in the north and abandoning the south to UKIP, it seems that the proposal was deadly serious - because we all know who has parachuted himself in as the BNP's top Euro-candidate in the North-western region (its best hope); we all know who is most desperate to leave behind his toy pig farm for the riches of an MEP; and we all know who must demonstrate some clear electoral success for the BNP in the Euros or face internal revolt.

This proposal can only have come from Nick Griffin, with a gimlet eye fixed on the main chance. He'll make more from his utterly pointless membership of the European Parliament than he ever will from his BNP-bankrupting redundancy deal.

Given the lamentable condition of UKIP, I am quite convinced that Nick Griffin sent along his offer to Nigel Farage in good faith and in the belief that UKIP would take it seriously. I also believe that he did not expect Mottram the messenger to lay the plan before the UKIP in the unorthodox manner that he did, and nor did he expect the subsequent demeaning publicity.

Attempting to pull things around in one of his most hypocritical postings to date on the BNP website, Griffin affects to have known all along that there was little possibility of UKIP jumping into bed with the BNP, and the BNP itself is working overtime to give the impression that - somehow - it has tricked the UKIP, which, as a result of BNP cunning, will now fall into complete disarray.

This is so much whistling in the dark, but the BNP sheeple have taken up the tune, mostly because they have little choice if they are to drive from their minds the fact that the hated "false flag" UKIP has inflicted upon them a resounding humiliation - and the fact that it was given the opportunity to do so by Nick Griffin himself.

In his posting, Griffin - forgetting that wise politicians do not count their chickens before they are hatched - talks of "four virtually guaranteed BNP seats", a sign either of the contempt in which he holds the electorate or that in which we know he holds a BNP membership gullible enough to believe the prediction. It's probably the latter, as he attacks Nigel Farage for putting "his chances of securing his personal ambition ... above those of his party activists", which we imagine will strike only the sourest of notes in the BNP's North-west region, undemocratically hi-jacked by Griffin to secure his candidacy in a constituency in which he believes the rag-tag-and-bobtail vote will provide him with enough of a percentage to send him on his way to Brussels.

The man who plotted John Tyndall's overthrow and has ever since been engaged himself in the removal of his internal BNP enemies then has the effrontery to accuse Nigel Farage of "low cunning" in the expulsion of Buster Mottram and others, spluttering indignantly: "That’s democracy, Farage-style - sack those who might express dissent and then claim unanimous support!"

Now where have we seen "democracy" of that kind in operation lately? And who else do we know is most urgently desirous of gaining what he himself describes as "five years of well-pensioned, feather-bedded, spanking luxury"?

A trick has indeed been worked by the BNP, but the victim was not Nigel Farage and the UKIP. It is the gullible mass of BNP sheeple, who have willingly convinced themselves that a self-inflicted public relations disaster is in fact a great victory for the infallible Griffin.

Will they ever learn?

November 01, 2008

Scraping the barrel

19 Comment (s)
You always know when the BNP is scraping the barrel for good news: the BNP website begins reporting on the speeches of the likes of David Hannam, the elementary activity of a local branch pushing leaflets through doors is given a prominence way beyond its importance, and the reporting of BNP by-election results is suspended.

David Hannam is the BNP's deputy treasurer and owner of Great White Records. Accused by the Decembrist rebels of financial incompetence and - some years ago - by former Hull BNP organiser Dr David Michael of theft, Hannam (along with Mark Collett) survived serious allegations of improprietry involving under-age girls made by a former member of the BNP security team.

Given his dubious record, Hannam is hardly the first person you'd invite along to give an opinion on the economic crisis currently engulfing the world, and so at a meeting of the BNP's Scarborough and Ryedale branch Hannam failed to provide any cutting insights into the issue that might have escaped the minds of our better known economic commentators, one of his more acute (if slightly tortured) observations, as retold on the BNP website, being, "The truth is that in an economically declining society, the worker is hit, but even in a so-called economically growing society, it is the worker who also gets hit."

According to the syntactically inelegant Hannam, the oncoming recession will "cause people to start looking around for political alternatives", and therefore "the BNP must be ready to take advantage of the mess all of the other parties have made of the economy". Unfortunately for Hannam, as we shall see, "people" just don't seem to see the BNP as one of those "political alternatives".

Having brought our attention to the weighty thoughts of David Hannam, a desperate BNP website editor then casts about for more morale-boosting stories with which to eke out the thin gruel served up on his gadget-strewn browser-scrambling pages, and comes up with the breathtaking news that the BNP has delivered 1000 leaflets (allegedly) in the suburbs of Norwich - located, apparently, in the "region" of Norfolk.

Regular leaflet delivery being the unremarkable staple activity of fascist organisations since the year dot, we were wondering why the fact that six people delivering a small number of leaflets to a small area of Norwich should warrant the attention paid to it. Perhaps the BNP webmaster was as astonished as ourselves to learn that there had been any activity at all on the behalf of Norfolk BNP, a group which notoriously, while the rest of the BNP went to the 2007 local election polls, thought it a far better idea to go out to dinner.

If there is one notable thing those of us who live in the "region" can tell you about Norfolk BNP, it is of the fact of its almost complete invisibility combined with a penchant on the part of some of its tiny band of members for throwing out wildly inaccurate statements (lies, to you and me) on the extent of their activities and intentions. I could add that at least two of its number have a liking for both online and real-world impersonation, but that's a matter for another time.

The long and short of it is that Norfolk BNP has always been pretty useless, not much interested in the bread and butter of political work while there's a pint to be downed or a steak to be chewed on, and until recently anti-fascists in the county were obliged to challenge the threat of the far smaller but much more active National Front. Only in west Norfolk, back in May 2007, did the local BNP - rather despite its own laziness - come close to pulling off an unexpected (and certainly undeserved) success, when it came within an ace of winning the North Lynn ward (King's Lynn) of West Norfolk County Council.

That near-miss most definitely surprised the BNP's King's Lynn activists, who you can count on four of the fingers of one hand, they bringing it about with little, if any, help from the rest of the local BNP organisation.

And that, until Nick Griffin's sneaking visit to Norfolk a few months ago, was all anybody in the "region" ever heard of the BNP.

News, then, that Norfolk BNP has finally got around to doing something is, we suppose, worthy - but worthy of what isn't readily obvious. Perhaps the BNP's web editor felt that the surprise value inherent in Norfolk BNP doing anything at all was enough to propel a tale of six racists taking to the leaflet trail ("one sunny morning") into the party headlines.

Not making the party headlines, naturally, is the recent slew of mostly dire BNP local by-election results, which rather tend to negate David Hannam's belief (if he really believes it) that the BNP is one of the "political alternatives" to which the people will turn.

The people of Dewsbury turned away from the BNP in droves on October 16th, when, in a by-election caused by the resignation of BNP rebel Colin Auty, the party's vote fell by 50% and the BNP lost Dewsbury East. A week later, in East Wittering ward, Chichester, the people signally failed to turn to the BNP, which was breaking new territory and expecting to take 15% of the vote - it took 12.3%, despite the helpful demographic of the ward.

A week later on October 23rd, the gloom continued. In the East Midlands - prime electoral territory for the BNP and a matter of deep concern for anti-fascists - a BNP candidate standing in the (Loughborough) Dishley and Hathern ward of Charnwood Borough Council managed a 3.6% vote loss, while the party's troubles in the West Midlands gathered pace. In Wolverhampton Wednesfield North, which saw the BNP peak at 26% in 2006, the BNP vote fell from May's 15.37% to 11.78%. In Wednesfield South, which the BNP did not contest in May, the BNP vote was 14.4% - but that does represent a 1.2% increase over an outing in 2007, when the party obtained 13.2%. Hardly the stuff of even the quietest revolutions.

On October 30th the BNP obtained its best recent result - and its worst.

In St. John's ward, Workington, the BNP took 20.22%, and beforehand gave every impression that it could win. In the event it came third. Though nobody can afford to ignore the fact that one in five of those voting gave their support to the BNP, the extent of the party's failure can be judged by this posting made on our associated forum:
According to info on the Cumbria BNP site [and I'm certainly not accepting that as gospel!] the BNP threw the kitchen sink at this, along with the fridge/freezer, washing machine and everything else!!
  • multiple leaflets
  • last election leaflet delivered in a single afternoon with 14 deliverers
  • three canvass rounds
  • a personally addressed mail-merge letter
  • Dicky Barnbrook visited [which might not be exactly a bonus - but does indicate that it was being taken seriously]
They also claim that the other parties ran low-key campaigns.

If the above is even nearly true then 20% is very disappointing for them - if I had that amount of literature and manpower to throw at a council byelection in a small district ward I would be expecting to win - not come third!! [And I've fought umpteen council elections.]
If we can deem the St. John's ward result to be a relative failure on account of the resources poured in and the expectations raised, for pure disaster we need to visit Camden's Kentish Town, where in a six-cornered contest BNP candidate Edith Crowther managed to come 5th, with 62 votes and a miserable 2.4% share, the only crumb of freezing comfort being that the UKIP came last.

All this sobering election news, and more besides, never appeared on the BNP website, showcase of the "serious" political party that thinks the unintelligable musings of its incompetent deputy-treasurer deserving of a wider audience, and which is stunned that something - anything at all, really - happened in Norfolk.

Enjoy the weekend, folks.

May 28, 2008

Labour's lost ground

2 Comment (s)
Stoke-on-Trent used to be a Labour stronghold, but now it has nine BNP councillors. Some fear that the far-right party could be running the town hall by 2011. Patrick Barkham reports on how the left is losing the battle for white working-class votes

Up the hill, past trimmed privet hedges and rows of interwar semis is Bentilee neighbourhood centre. Opened last year, the £10m building has panoramic views of Stoke-on-Trent and sparkles in the sun. At its front is a bustling butcher, baker and small supermarket. Behind is a library, doctor's surgery, dentist, community centre, youth service and "one-stop shop" for every kind of environmental and housing inquiry. Without the Labour-led city council and its private finance initiative-funded project, the Bentilee estate would still have its shabby old shopping precinct. But this glittering building, the new nursery down the road, immaculate streets and a 39% fall in crime on the estate do not fill many residents with joy and appreciation.

"They haven't just let me down. They've broken my heart," says John Oldcroft, sitting outside the centre. "Stoke-on-Trent has been Labour for 60-odd years and they've taken everything for granted. Labour are just turning into Conservatives. We've got a local BNP lad who lives on the estate and he came and had a word."

Oldcroft voted for the BNP this month, and the far-right party now has nine representatives on Stoke-on-Trent council, including all three representatives elected from Bentilee's ward. Three gains in the May election gave the BNP their second largest council group in the country, after Barking and Dagenham's 12 councillors. Stoke City's promotion to the football Premier League has spread a feelgood factor across the city but there is also foreboding: it is not just the BNP talking up its prospects of power. Labour activists fear the BNP is now the strongest single party in Stoke. On May 1, Labour polled 14,000 votes in 20 seats; the BNP polled almost 8,000 standing in just 10 seats. A minority Labour administration struggles on; the council chamber is fragmented by independents and neither the Conservatives nor the Liberal Democrats are bigger than the BNP. Senior local politicians, commentators and residents believe this city of 250,000 could be controlled by the BNP within three years. How has Stoke got here?

Like the other large estates that have become far-right strongholds in Stoke, Bentilee residents are overwhelmingly white. Census records show just 1.9% of the population is from black and ethnic minority communities. Nearly 50% of Bentilee's residents don't work; most, like Oldcroft, are "on the sick", as locals say. He has a visibly painful back complaint, but is more concerned about housing. His 24-year-old daughter lives at home and is still waiting for a council house. Immigrants, he claims, always seem to get set up with houses. "You can't park your car and there are arguments here and arguments there. We'll soon be like Bradford. People have got to listen to our views."

Oldcroft's concerns are voiced by plenty of residents but they are not supported by the facts: in June last year, just 2.7% of council tenants on the Bentilee estate described themselves as from a black or ethnic minority background. The BNP, however, is listening keenly to these complaints. Later that day, Alby Walker, the BNP group leader on the council, turns up for his regular bingo session at the nearby Abbey Hulton community centre. "I'm not a bingo fan myself. You go along and help put the tables out and take the money. It could be described as a surgery because everyone knows we'll be there," he says.

Walker is articulate but not a demagogue, a businessman who runs a small joinery firm and a family man whose wife, Ellie, a school governor, has also been elected as a BNP councillor. Above him in the BNP's high-ceilinged room in city hall, is an election poster that reads: "People like you, voting BNP."

Apart from calling Labour councillors "scruffy" - he wears a pinstripe suit and fat tie - Walker's favourite piece of vocabulary (to the Guardian, anyway) is "community champions". The BNP's councillors "are good hardworking grassroots councillors who are real community champions", he says. Other parties are "scaremongering" about the BNP, he says. "All the old lads say to me, 'We're disgusted. How can they say that about you and Ellie? You're such lovely people.'"

Walker likes to talk about all the things he has done for local people since he was elected in 2005. "I'm getting birthday cards off 80-year-old ladies," he says. There is no BNP army - they cobbled together 40 activists for the local election campaign - and it is hard to find anyone in local politics who believes the BNP are performing constructively or effectively in Stoke's council chamber. But even their political opponents agree that the BNP councillors are busily visible in their local areas. "The BNP have gone into the communities, they've listened to what people said and they've engaged with them in ways Labour haven't for years," says Mick Temple, professor of politics and journalism at Stafford University.

"The men and women of the BNP look like your neighbours," says Michael Tappin, the former Labour group leader and ex-Stoke MEP who lost his council seat on May 1. "They are not the mythical 25st men with body-piercings and tattoos as portrayed by antifascist demonstrators. They are respectable. It's impossible to demonise them. They wear suits, they look tidy." As Tappin says, they pick up old ladies when they fall over in the street, shop for the elderly and cut people's lawns. "It's like that saying about Mussolini - 'at least he made the trains run on time.' Here, it's 'at least they get your grass cut.'"

The rise of the BNP in Stoke is also the story of Labour's catastrophic decline. Twelve years ago, Labour won all 60 seats on Stoke's new unitary council. Now it holds 15, plus the mayor. Vast swaths of the city - 13 of 20 wards - have no Labour representation: 12 of their councillors represent four wards where Stoke's ethnic minority populations are concentrated. "We've become a minority party," says Tappin.

For years this sprawling conurbation served up manual labour in PPE - pits, pots and engineering. The unions were strong and there was only ever one party to vote for. Allegiance to Labour passed through families. Three decades ago, more than 50,000 people worked in the potteries; now 6,000 do. Stoke has one of the lowest proportions of people in employment in England and Wales - fewer residents work than in the Thatcher era. Unemployment has fallen in the city since then but more people claim incapacity and disability benefits. Some say that Stoke's white working class has become an underclass.

As jobs and unions disappeared, so Labour withered, losing dynamism at its grass roots and suffering the complacency and arrogance of any one-party regime. It was a "dynastic situation", says one former local politician: fathers and sons ran the party and controlled community centres. Elsewhere, local Labour groups were modernised by polytechnic lecturers or lawyers in the 70s and 80s. In Stoke, there was no pool of talent for the party to renew itself. Labour insiders say local membership is below 300. Tappin's verdict on his local party is damning: "It's been allowed to fester and become inward-looking. It's become concerned with arcane debates about rules, not about policy. Most of the Labour party still resides in the 1930s."

Michael Wolfe realised the growing unpopularity of Labour when he began a campaign for a referendum on whether Stoke should have a directly elected mayor. The charismatic former head of the city's Citizens Advice Bureau, Wolfe gathered a 10,000-signature petition, forced Labour to agree to a poll and became the city's first elected mayor in 2002. Stoke has become a testbed for a unique form of local government with its elected mayor guided by an unelected chief executive and decisions taken by an executive board of elected councillors from different parties. The election of an openly gay independent mayor was seen as a sign Stoke was moving with the times, but Wolfe lost his post in 2005 to Labour. Wolfe says Labour has been unable to reinvent the economy of a failing manufacturing city. Tappin agrees: "Labour has not offered people a vision of how to get out of deindustrialisation, how to get its 42,000 residents on benefits back into work. It's put sticking plasters on [instead of] wholesale reform."

Ask local people what concerns them and the big issues are seldom national, although Gordon Brown gets a kicking over the 10p tax band. Most mentioned are Labour's closure of care homes in Stoke, its Building Schools for the Future project (closing old schools and constructing new ones) and the city's regeneration, which will involve the anachronistic-sounding demolition of streets of Victorian terraces. All three projects are viewed with suspicion. Labour leaders past and present defend the policies, which they argue will lead to more elderly people being properly cared for in their homes, the overhaul of Stoke's battered, underachieving schools, and a cleaner city with more shops, jobs and affordable homes.

Prejudices have also been allowed to fester, believes Wolfe. He says he suffered homophobic insults from the Labour establishment and would hear local politicians casually refer to "darkies". Some of the city's ruling elite never accepted the equality agenda, he argues: "It was always seen as too controversial to take on the equalities thinking of other councils such as Manchester." Estates such as Bentilee and Abbey Hulton were allowed to stay almost completely white as Labour councillors helped block the black and Asian people taking up council homes in the 80s and 90s, he claims. "In effect, we have racially segregated estates. Race is a very beguiling solution to economic problems but what drives people into the BNP's arms is poverty, and within poverty I include lack of education."

In other cities, Labour's failure would lead to a resurgent Conservative or Liberal Democrat regime but I did not meet anyone on Stoke's estates who votes Tory or Lib Dem. In this one-party state, the BNP has stepped into the vacuum. Its tactics are typical of those defined by its national leadership. Simon Darby, the deputy leader, is based nearby in the West Midlands and takes a close interest. "They are talking about housing and schools and are very good at opportunistically picking up an issue," says Wolfe. "They campaign in a way that none of us recognise. People arrive in pubs, lean at the bar, buy a few drinks, say they are doing some contract work in town, become very matey and then tell people these rumours." Typical tall stories include a Kosovan cashing a £5,000 cheque from the council so he can buy a car and one of Stoke's historic buildings being renovated by the council to become a mosque.

The BNP's racist campaigns seem a useful way of getting into communities. Walker talks about care homes, schools and regeneration. He also offers a pungent mix of nostalgia and conspiratorial claims about immigrants and Islam, from the the apocryphal Muslim taxi drivers who "piss in bottles and throw them out of cabs" to the council giving housing priority to immigrants. (This is untrue: lettings are assessed on need - people who are homeless, or in overcrowded accommodation - which is unrelated to ethnicity. Priority is given to new tenants with a local connection - if they have lived in Stoke for three out of the last five years or have family or employment in the city. In 2006/07, of the 81% of council lettings where ethnicity was recorded, 10.9% were made to black and ethnic minority households.)

Asked if he is racist, Walker does not directly deny the charge: "We're not tied by political correctness, we've just got to make sure what we say is within the law," he says. "Any leaflet we put out is open to legal scrutiny so there's no racist literature put out while I've been involved." He hands me one. "That was our most effective leaflet," he says, visibly proud. "Hanley 70 years ago," it reads above a montage of photos of the church tower, pottery kilns and smiling housewives. "Is this what you want for our city centre?" it says below, next to silhouettes of mosques and a picture of three women in niqab, one of whom is raising two fingers to the camera. BNP tactics in his ward, Abbey Green, were "soft" in comparison, he says, "because we've already won the people over".

Mark Meredith, Stoke's elected mayor, has excluded the BNP councillors from his cross-party executive. The BNP reckon this is a mistake, but so too do many independent observers. Temple says some disaffected residents see it as "a slight on working-class voters" and a denial of their democratic choices. Wolfe argues that the BNP's exclusion allows them to snipe from the sidelines and blame everyone else for Stoke's struggles. "It's completely playing into their hands. I want to give the BNP the opportunity to expose the vacuousness of their solutions. They haven't got any answers to how to bring more jobs to Stoke, how to regenerate Stoke, and that will only be exposed when they are included in the council."

Taken further, this argument implies that only by letting them gain power will people see them for what they are. This, argues Tappin, would be "catastrophic" for Stoke, triggering a brain drain of council officials and an exodus of investment and new businesses. "You're not going to come to a town run by the BNP," he says. Meredith maintains he is right to exclude them. "I've always recognised that the BNP councillors have been elected by constituents so I've never proposed that the BNP are excluded from the committees of council," he says. The BNP are represented on council committees in proportion to their group size. "With that power comes a real responsiblity to engage in positive politics," says the mayor. "One of their proposals is cutting funding to the Citizens Advice Bureau - an organisation that helps the most in need across Stoke-on-Trent. To date I haven't heard one policy from the BNP that will improve the lives of ordinary people."

He accepts in that self-exculpating New Labour way that the party "needs to listen to what the voters are saying" and it has not "communicated effectively to its core voters across the city". This may seem to be the usual line - nothing wrong with what we're doing, we just haven't got the spin correct. But, he argues: "The whole regeneration of Stoke is moving forward at some pace now. That's the reality but it's not always the perception on the ground."

Others argue that the ineffectiveness of Stoke's elected mayor has contributed to the rise of the BNP. Today, professor Michael Clarke, vice-principal of Birmingham University, will deliver a report calling for a radical rethink of how the city is governed. "We are dismayed at the extent to which the city's political system is damaged," he says. "There is a deep-seated malaise in the city's politics. As a consequence, the people of Stoke-on-Trent have been short-changed." The report, commissioned by John Healey, the minister for local government, urges Stoke to reduce the size of its council and to rediscover its civic pride, while telling political parties they need to re-engage at a local level. In recommending a drastic cutting of councillors and a referendum on whether Stoke should keep its mayor, there is a danger Labour will be seen to be changing the rules to stop a future BNP mayor. But Tappin believes that keeping the system will guarantee a BNP triumph. "If we get the structure wrong and there is an elected mayor, this city will become controlled by the BNP," he says. He fears the BNP could gain power in three years; Walker more modestly forecasts power within five years.

The best hope for stopping the BNP in Stoke appears to lie in reawakening the Labour party, but no one agrees how. "The tactics by a lot of people on the left are out of date," says Lawrence Shaw, a Stoke trade unionist. "Saying 'smash the fascists' doesn't work any more. If there was a serious, union-based alternative to Labour with roots in the community that would see BNP support fall away quite dramatically."

Wolfe believes the BNP would disappear if the council could help create real jobs - not call-centre and other low-paid work - in Stoke. Tappin wants the regional Labour party to intervene and begin an urgent grassroots reform of the party. If its council and mayor can't deliver real improvements for local people, Labour faces electoral oblivion in its former stronghold, warns Tappin: "We are going to go into the darkness and those who will suffer will be the people of Stoke-on-Trent."

Guardian

April 09, 2008

Election news: BNP dirty tricks at York University - Welsh BNP man "shocked to be told he was a candidate"

7 Comment (s)
Police probe right-wing leaflet drop

A member of the far-right British National Party (BNP) allegedly infiltrated the University of York mail system to deliver "offensive" material. Numerous members of university staff received leaflets issued by a BNP worker, which included strong attacks on Muslims.

One university staff member said the man distributing the leaflets had posed as a university employee to access the post room.

Tony Bamber, who produced and jointly distributed the leaflets, denied impersonating anyone, but confirmed he had visited the postal room "like I was from any postal company delivering post".

A university spokesman said: "We deplore the underhand use of the university's internal mail system, whose working practices have now been changed to guard against any repetition. Many staff found this material offensive, and we have forwarded copies of the various letters to North Yorkshire Police."

Mr Bamber, of Lancashire, distributed at least two different leaflets, one of which has been forwarded to The Press.

It accuses Britain's political leaders of failing to defend Britain's economy, culture and land, and says they have failed the nation by allowing Muslims to create "large and hostile colonies". It says the political elite should "destroy themselves".

Mr Bamber said York was targeted because of comments by the Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, on the slave trade last year.

A spokesman for the archbishop said the issue was not worthy of comment.

The university spokesman said the university's guiding principles included freedom of speech, but also tolerance and respect for diversity.

Sam Bayley, societies and communications officer for York University Students Union, said he was not aware of students being targeted recently, but said most were currently away on Easter holidays.

He added: "The union does not want the BNP targeting our students, because it makes a lot of our students uncomfortable on campus. The BNP goes against a lot of aims we have and certainly against some of our equal opportunities policies."

He said the union had passed a motion condemning the BNP, and added: "Our students do not want to see them on campus, and we will do what we can to support them in that."

A North Yorkshire Police spokeswoman said: "We are aware of the allegations and we have commenced an investigation, which is currently in its very early stages, and inquiries are ongoing."

A second leaflet, not yet seen by The Press, blames Muslims for the heroin trade in Britain. The leaflets are attributed to the Preston Pals, a group set up by Mr Bamber.

He told The Press the indigenous people of the British Isles had been "betrayed" and said the group modelled itself on a "Ghandian" approach.

In the leaflets, he said: "I personally went to the post room and handed them in like I was from any postal company delivering post, instead of using the Post Office and spending money on stampage. We certainly did not impersonate anybody."

BNP spokesman Simon Darby said Mr Bamber's leaflets were stronger than they would have issued, but said: "It's not something we would put out directly but what does he say that's not true? It's the blunt truth. If he had told lies I would have disassociated ourselves and the party from it."

York Press


BNP take two council seats unopposed in Conwy

TWO British National Party candidates will be elected unopposed to a North Wales town council on May 1. Election officials in Conwy this week released documents showing the BNP is fielding a host of candidates in the town/community council elections.

In the elections for Bay of Colwyn Town Council, BNP candidate Paul Harley, of Penrhyn Bay, is unopposed in the Dinarth Ward in Rhos-on-Sea. There are three vacancies and only three candidates.

In nearby Rhos Ward, BNP candidate John Oddy, of Rhos-on-Sea, is among four candidates who will fill most of the five vacancies. But a third BNP candidate due to stand in Kinmel Bay Ward said he felt misled into standing and last night vowed to withdraw.

Neil Hughes, 19, is a BNP member, and would be one of eight candidates to fill eight vacancies in Kinmel Bay Ward for Towyn and Kinmel Bay Town Council on May 1.

But he said last night a BNP man had visited his home three weeks ago and made him sign election papers several times. Mr Hughes said the BNP man said he could become a “paper candidate” and “resign on May 1.”

But joinery student Mr Hughes was shocked to be told he was a candidate by the Daily Post.

Mr Hughes, a student at Coleg Llandrillo Cymru in Rhos-on-Sea, said: “I’m shocked. A BNP man came to our house three weeks ago and asked me to sign papers. I thought I was supporting someone else to stand. I don’t want to stand. I’m annoyed about this.”

Asked for his views on immigration, Mr Hughes, of Maesgwyn, Kinmel Bay, said: “I don’t want to say anything. I’m a bit confused.”

Meanwhile, the two bona fide, unopposed BNP candidates could be joined by fellow BNP hopefuls in other seats on May 1. There are seven other BNP candidates standing for town council elections in Conwy, and nine BNP candidates in Conwy County Council elections on May 1.

One is Neil Hughes who is set to withdraw from this contest too.

BNP North West Wales regional organiser John Oddy, 51, of Rhos-on-Sea, said: “There was certainly no intention to mislead Neil. He was intended as a paper candidate, there to take votes from the main parties but it was not our intention he would win the seat and we were not going to leaflet for him. It was just a case of having a BNP member on the list.

“As it turned out and to our surprise he was elected unopposed. This may have led to the misunderstanding. We will now withdraw him as a candidate on Wednesday.”

Last night Clwyd West MP David Jones said: “The BNP are a racialist and pretty odious party. I don’t think those seeking election will be successful here. North Wales is not the sort of territory that would welcome the BNP.”

Mr Oddy denied being racist.

North Wales Daily Post

November 28, 2007

Crime down in Welwyn Hatfield - misleading BNP claims rebutted

3 Comment (s)
Claims by the British National Party (BNP) that crime is on the increase in Welwyn Hatfield have been rebutted by Hertfordshire Police.

Latest figures show that crime in the region is down by 12 per cent compared with the previous year. The figures, measured between April 1 and November 25, 2007, found that violent crime has decreased by 22.4 percent compared with the same period in 2006. Residential burglary is down by 14.2 per cent and motor vehicle crime by 5.3 percent. Robbery has also dropped by 8.8 per cent, serious violent crime by 26 per cent and serious sexual offences have reduced by 22.2 per cent.

Area commander Alison Roome-Gifford said: "The results are in direct contradiction to a leaflet published by the BNP which was brought to our attention by a member of the public who received it through her door in Welham Green. We would like to reassure the community that the claims that robberies, burglaries and sexual assaults are on the increase, are factually incorrect as confirmed by the figures."

"The figures demonstrate that we have had at least 721 fewer victims in terms of all crime this year across the Welwyn Hatfield district. That is something to be proud of. Aside from the hard work our officers, Police Community Support Officers, police staff and partner agencies put into keeping crime down, we also have to give huge thanks to the general public - who are our eyes and ears in the community.

"As well as Neighbourhood Watch and other groups and organisations who work closely with us, it's the information that comes in from members of the public who answer our witness appeals and who let us know what's going on and where. We all work together to let offenders know their criminal behaviour is unacceptable in our communities and it won't be tolerated."

St Albans and Harpenden Review

September 27, 2007

Three horse race - but two thirds didn't bet

1 Comment (s)
THE British National Party stood last week for the first time in a Copeland Borough Council election.

By the time of last Thursday night’s count, the campaign had been fought, largely in Whitehaven’s market place, where BNP candidate Bill Pugh had canvassed hard. But seeing the way his party colleagues jostled for position around the counting tables you’d have been forgiven for thinking they were about to go to war again.

Mr Pugh conducted himself quietly, sitting calmly at the back of the room with his wife, and praising his opponents when the result was announced. He was described by one of the other politicians in the room as “a good guy who’d fallen in with the wrong crowd”.

That crowd was out in force, displaying their red, white and blue BNP rosettes. Regional organiser Clive Jefferson scoured the room during the count, occasionally barking orders to the others: “You keep an eye on that!” “Don’t let them away with anything.”

It was clear it was going to be a long night.

Mr Jefferson looked furious at times, watching events all around the room, stopping occasionally to glug from a bottle of Lucozade.

The room had an air of unease about it, which seasoned Conservative councillors Norman and Yvonne Clarkson clearly sensed. They wandered around the room, shaking hands with people from all three parties and generally brightening the mood.

Brigid Whiteside and her husband Chris, the prospective Tory candidate for the next general election, stood quietly at one end of the room while Labour’s Jeanette Williams sat, looking the most nervous of all the candidates.

Even when it was clear she had won comfortably (they divide the votes into batches for each party before they count them and her stack was substantially larger than anyone else’s) she refused to get excited.

Her fellow Harbour ward councillor, Henry Wormstrup, took some of the pressure off her when his mobile phone rang and he was the unfortunate one who was the first in the room to be frowned at by elections officer Alan Southward.

The tension mounted, and under Mr Jefferson’s watchful eye, each of the votes not marked with a clear X was scrutinised and added to the appropriate pile.

Yet two-thirds of the Harbour Ward’s eligible voters did not turn out on polling day.

The BNP is, understandably, the most controversial political party in the country. Its views on race and immigration are, its organisers claim, greatly exaggerated in the media in an attempt to discredit what they stand for.

If you looked past the Union Jacks and BNP slogans, Mr Pugh’s election leaflet read for the most part like an electorate’s dream. He advocated a return to weekly bin rounds, moving away from fortnightly collections; an end to the council’s Executive “squandering tax-payers’ money” on what he regards as extravagances such as the away-days recently revealed by The Whitehaven News.

He was also keen to protect our hospital services and look after elderly residents, as well as providing more affordable social housing.

But there, in the middle of it all, was another pledge, to stand against plans for a large-scale mosque in Whitehaven. The only trouble with their pledge is that there isn’t a mosque planned for Whitehaven, on any scale, large or otherwise.

The BNP delivered a petition to The Whitehaven News before the election, in which they claimed that 1,000 people were against the plans for a mosque. A number of names appear twice or three times and dozens of the signatures were from people from outside the area. Osama Bin Laden was among the signatures.

Back at the count, the returning officer – Copeland’s chief executive Liam Murphy, said that, politics aside, it had been one of the most exciting by-elections in Copeland’s history.

As it turned out the police presence wasn’t necessary, and the expected trouble didn’t occur. Perhaps Copeland’s decision to enforce a rule that exists but which is rarely exercised,which limits the number of supporters who can accompany each candidate at the count, was a wise one.

But for now the voice of democracy has spoken, Harbour’s newest councillor has taken her seat – and the good people of Copeland get back to their day-to-day lives.

Whitehaven News

May 01, 2007

Wales Police Boss Replies On BNP Ban

2 Comment (s)

North Wales Chief Constable Richard Brunstrom has replied to a complaint that an invesitgation was made into the case of a police officer who endorsed a local councillor who is a member of the British National Party in Mold.

Mr Brunstrom replied:

"As you have chosen to write an open letter to me it seems only reasonable that I should provide an open response and let members of the public draw their own conclusions.

I cannot discuss the specific case that you raised as the alleged misconduct is still being investigated. However, I welcome the opportunity to comment on the general questions that you put and the inaccurate assertions that your letter contains.

You seem to have wilfully misinterpreted the comments attributed to the Police Federation Representative, Constable Jeff Birch, in the Daily Post on the 12th of April. Constable Birch carefully did not allow himself to be drawn into the specifics of the case being investigated and did not mention the endorsement of candidates. However, he did accurately represent what Police Regulations say about membership of the BNP; to alleviate any doubt about the Regulations let me quote for you the relevant parts.

Police Regulations 2003 Schedule 1 (as amended) provides:

Reg. 1 (1) A member of a police force shall at all times abstain from any activity which is likely to interfere with the impartial discharge of his duties or which is likely to give rise to the impression amongst members of the public that it may so interfere.

1 (2) A member of a police force shall in particular -
(a) not take an active part in politics;
(b) not belong to any organisation specified or described in a determination of the Secretary of State.

Annex AA - (the Secretary of State determined that from 1st January 2005 this provision come into force as follows):
No member of a police force may be a member of any of the following organisations-
(a) The British National Party
(b) Combat 18
(c) The National Front

These Regulations are quite simply the law of the land, as determined by Parliament. All officers are aware that when we join the Police Service our lives change; this change includes our not being able to play an active part in politics (no great hardship for most of us). It is precisely because I want to live in a parliamentary democracy, and not a police state, that I actively welcome this restriction on my private life. As police officers we cannot and must not give the impression that we might be beholden to any political party for that way lies perdition.

As to your suggestion that these restrictions are an infringement of the Human Rights Act of 1998, I suggest that you actually read the Act before making spurious comments such as this in future. For clarity, Article 10 of the European Convention, which is incorporated in our UK Act, sets out the right to freedom of expression, but also makes it clear that this right is not absolute and that such a right may be subject to restrictions as set out below:

Article 10 (2)
The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary

Clearly the Government is fully entitled to put restrictions on the political activity of police officers, members of the armed services and a range of other public servants, and it has chosen, entirely properly, so to do. The message, set out clearly by the Act, is thus: if you want to play politics, don't join the Police. This is once again quite simply the law, and law which I wholeheartedly endorse both as a senior police officer and as a citizen.

You suggest that I may be concerned about being held to account by a BNP led local Council or Welsh Assembly. You are right. I am, but I assure you that I have not yet had cause to lose a moment's sleep worrying about this prospect.

You also write about so called 'positive discrimination advocated by a very misguided Lord Scarman. It would appear that you have never read The Scarman Report: The Brixton Disorders (1981). I can only suggest that you visit your local library and borrow the report before misrepresenting his views again. You may also wish to undertake some training so that you can understand the difference between positive action (both legal and desirable) and positive discrimination, which is neither.

To remove any remaining scintilla of doubt let me formally endorse the views of the Association of Chief Police Officers of England Wales and Northern Ireland, which in July 2004 unequivocally stated that police officers and staff should face dismissal if they join the BNP.

Membership of, or support for, the BNP is completely incompatible with the honour of holding the Office of Constable.

Yours sincerely
Richard Brunstrom
Prif Gwnstabl/Chief Constable

NEWSWALES.CO.UK

April 27, 2007

UNISON to 'stop racism' in anti-BNP campaign

0 Comment (s)
UNISON is preparing to take its campaign against the BNP and other far-right parties to the streets of Scotland this weekend.

The union's branches are organising a number of initiatives in different parts of the country on Saturday April 28 to take the message out to the public that 'racists have no place in Scotland'. It's part of their UK-wide campaign to prevent the organisation building on its 2006 ballot gains.

UNISON has produced large numbers of leaflets and posters urging its members to be careful with their vote on May 3.

Scottish organiser Dave Watson said: "UNISON members care for the whole community in Scotland; we won't allow racists to wreck Scotland's economic and cultural future. The BNP preach their message of hate, but try to hide it under a veneer of respectability. They use lies and rumour to pedal myths about, migrant workers and asylum seekers. We have been working to expose those myths and welcome much needed workers into Scotland."

He pointed to a recent economic report which found the influx of migrant workers into Scotland had boosted the economy, saying that without them the building trade would collapse, the catering and tourist trade would suffer and the health service would fall apart.

With the new proportional representation system, particularly in the local elections, there is a danger that low turnout could lead to BNP candidates being elected by default, Mr Watson said. "We are urging our members and the general public to get out and ensure they cannot destroy our democracy."

However, Dr Phil Edwards, National Press Officer for the BNP has accused UNISON of hypocrisy.

He said: "Most members do not tell the union what political party they are in. There are many members in the union who support the BNP and they are appalled by this. It is not democratic for them to campaign against us but not stand for election themselves. They get hundreds of thousands of pounds of funding from other people's money - we haven't got any money. How can you define racism? We are not racists - we are race realists."

24dash

April 21, 2007

Families refute BNP "help" claims

0 Comment (s)
FAMILIES fighting to save their central Barrow homes are refuting the British National Party’s claim to have helped them out.

The far right organisation said it was the only party to support North Central residents in their battle against Barrow Borough Council’s home demolition plan.

It wants to win its first seat on the council on May 3.

But residents in Arthur Street — one of the streets threatened by the council’s clearance proposal — say they have had no help from the BNP.

Jason Bentley, 49, said: “I don’t recall them helping us out at all.

“The only person that has stood by us is Jim (Hamezeian, Peoples Party councillor).

“He has helped us out quite a lot, has Jim, speaking up for us at meetings and everything.”

Mr Bentley says he has no time for the BNP.

“They’re a bunch of racists,” he said. “Anything I get from them goes straight in the bin.”

Daisy Potter also said she had no help from the BNP. And Ann Hillman, 47, said: “They haven’t helped at all. I haven’t even seen any BNP.” Mrs Hillman said Cllr Hamezeian had helped them the most.

“He has steered us in the right direction,” she said. I don’t think we’d have known what to do if we hadn’t had his help.”

Cllr Hamezeian’s wife, Rosemarie Hamezeian, 54, is standing for the Peoples Party. Mrs Hamezeian said that, to her knowledge, from knocking on doors, the BNP had done nothing for the people of Central.

She said: “The Peoples Party has been working for the people of Central for a long time now on various issues but certainly on the regeneration of their homes.

“If elected, I’ll do everything I can to make sure their houses are not pulled down.”
But BNP candidate Mike Ashburner says the BNP does not regard the Peoples Party as a proper political party.

“They’re merely a mob of Marxist misfits,” he said.

And, Mr Ashburner maintains, neither he nor the party are racist.

Labour election agent Dave Pidduck said: “The Labour party has always been prepared to work with and listen to the residents and the residents’ associations.

“Unfortunately, opportunities to do that are being restricted by other groups who are working for their own ends.”

Cllr Pidduck described Labour’s Central ward candidate, Ann Thomson, as an excellent candidate and councillor who works hard to represent her residents.

Ollie Flitcroft, election campaign manager for the Tories, described their Central ward candidate Lucy Pearson, 22, as a bright young girl with lots of skills.

And on the homes issue, Cllr Flitcroft said: “The Conservative administration took time and effort to go and speak directly to the residents, to listen to their concerns, to what they had to say. And after long periods of discussion, the Conservative administration backed the residents in their wishes and I’m pleased to say we’re fully square behind them in what they want.”

North-west Evening Mail