Alleged jumping of housing queues by new arrivals is a myth, research reveals

· Most rent privately or are owner-occupiers
· No evidence of bias against British-born

There is no evidence that new migrants are jumping the queue for council and housing association homes to the detriment of any other group, including white families, according to new research.

The study, published by the Equality and Human Rights Commission and the Local Government Association, found that more than 60% of new migrants to Britain in the last five years are living in private rented accommodation, with most newly arrived migrants banned from access to social housing.

The study, carried out by the Institute for Public Policy Research, follows claims by the culture minister, Margaret Hodge, and others last year that the housing system gives priority treatment to recently arrived migrant families over the entitlement that others felt they had to resources in the community. The interim findings of the research, based on a snapshot of council housing allocations and a poll of local authority housing managers, says there is no evidence to suggest that the present system of social housing demonstrates measurable bias against any group, including UK-born nationals.

The IPPR study shows that out of the 10.1 million council and housing association tenants in Britain, 9 million are UK-born and just over 1 million were born outside the country. It adds that only 183,300 - less than 2% - of tenants arrived in Britain in the last five years and most of the 1 million are long-settled migrants who have been here for years and may have become British citizens.

The analysis of housing for new migrants to the UK who have arrived over the last five years, including those from Poland and other east European countries, shows 60% living in private rented accommodation, 18% owner-occupiers and only 11% allocated to social housing.

Trevor Phillips, chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said the findings were a broad indication that the system was working fairly for all groups. "What's clear is that there is a gap between supply and demand of social housing, of which the presence of immigrants is a relatively small element, but often a highly visible one."

Danny Sriskandarajah, of the IPPR, said there was no more emotive combination of issues in British life than immigration and housing: "As we near local elections, we risk being swamped by myths about queue-jumping foreigners. We have found no evidence of a systematic bias in favour of migrants. Where there is need, migrant families seem to be rightfully allocated social housing."

Hodge sparked a row with fellow politicians and refugee groups last May when she suggested in the Observer that newly arrived immigrants were being given priority for scarce social housing over British-born families.

She said the government "prioritised the needs of an individual migrant family over the entitlement that others feel they have to resources in the community".

The MP for Barking, in east London, continued: "We should look at policies where the legitimate sense of entitlement felt by the indigenous family overrides the legitimate need demonstrated by the new migrants." Her comments won the approval of the BNP, which said she deserved "a word of compliment ... for her efforts to raise the thorny issue of social housing for native Britons". Hodge said that her article had been misinterpreted, adding that she wanted refugees excluded from any housing restrictions.

Most new migrants in the past five years, particularly those from the eight east European countries which joined the EU in 2004, are not eligible for social housing unless they have been resident in the UK and in work for at least 12 months. Any application they make must meet the same criteria of need as UK-born applicants.

According to the latest figures for 170,263 lettings in the social housing sector in 2006-07 in England, where the nationality of the named tenant was collected, less than 5% went to foreign nationals and less than 1% went to new migrants from eastern Europe.

The picture is confirmed by the results of a poll of 66 housing managers across Britain, of whom 74% said they believed that migrants had "not very much" or "no" impact on increased demand for housing in the social rented sector, while 66% said they had increased pressure on private rented accommodation.

The study found that despite a lack of evidence to support allegations of queue-jumping, such claims were widely repeated and the perception remained.

The authors suggest one explanation may be that much of the private rented housing which is let to newly arrived migrants tends to be former council homes which have been sold off in hard-to-let blocks in run-down areas, and locals may assume it is still council accommodation.

Guardian

Grant loss blamed for growth of BNP

Lack of cash for social housing has helped far right’s cause in Barking & Dagenham

The abolition of the grant that helped councils fund new homes fuelled dissatisfaction that has led to the rise of the British National Party, the director of housing at Barking & Dagenham Council has claimed.

David Woods said the scrapping of local authority social housing grant had contributed directly to community cohesion problems.

And he told Inside Housing that local authorities now needed to reposition themselves as home builders if they were to tackle resentment effectively.

‘There has been a fall off of social rented units being built in this borough and their availability to people and that’s a great source of dissatisfaction,’ said Mr Woods. ‘The local authority social housing grant would have helped us stave off a lot of these problems; it’s a significant factor here.

‘We would like to start building new council houses. We want to get back to the position we were in a few years ago with social housing grant, where we were building between 400 and 500 social rented homes a year.’

The number of people on Barking & Dagenham’s housing register has tripled to nearly 9,000 in the last five years. Frustration with housing waiting lists, coupled with misconceptions about how housing is allocated, is widely attributed to the BNP becoming the council’s second largest political party.

‘The mythology that we’re trying to fight around here is that government investment in housing is all for asylum seekers and immigrants,’ Mr Woods said. ‘All local people see is their housing needs not being met. They see the housing register increasing, they see their sons and daughters who seven or eight years ago used to get access to low-cost housing through the council, not being able to do that any more.’

When the council had social housing grant it was treated as the funder of homes and delivered what the community needed, he said. The council now plans to form a series of asset investment vehicles in order to regain control over social home building. It will form a local housing company with partners, in which it will have a share of around 20 per cent.

The company will borrow money against the council land it builds on and the council will retain the freehold. Its brownfield sites have an estimated value of around £400 million.

‘We’re looking at how we can use this fantastic asset, our land, to get value for our local communities,’ said Mr Woods. ‘In the past, the government has encouraged us to realise asset value; it was always about stripping things from councils.’

Abigail Davies, principal policy officer at the Chartered Institute of Housing, said: ‘A lot of councils really felt the loss of the [social housing] grant, particularly those who used it to particularly good end.’

But she warned councils needed to wiseup on how they use their land.

‘A lot of local authorities have sold or are under pressure to sell their land for a market return,’ she said. ‘[The asset investment vehicle] is a good idea, because it’s a long-term thing. It’s not about selling off the family silver, it’s about making an investment.’

Inside Housing