Lancaster BNP opens a new dirty tricks department and it's rubbish

Poor old Chris Hill. Possibly the only person to fight for a seat for the BNP five times and lose resoundingly every time, he has had to resort to dirty tricks in an attempt to get back at Lancaster UAF for telling the truth about his glorious leader and his useless party. Hill, of course, is the leading (if not, the only) light in Lancaster BNP.

Hill, the sad sod, gets into trouble wherever he goes - even on the many far-right blogs he inhabits (though he says he's not a nazi). At Battle for Britain he was told to push off in no uncertain terms after making a stupid post about Bernard Manning;

'Anti-gag (Chris Hill) said... It should be remembered that Bernard Manning bottled out of performing at the RWB a few years ago. Giving in to political pressure from the establishment hardly makes him someone we should be looking up to. Bernard Manning was a gutless wonder, and is no loss to this Nation.

Battle For Britain said... Which would explain why he will be sorely missed, whereas your blog (which has an unhealthy pre-occupation with Lancaster UAF) will disappear from this particular blog! Are you another one of those tossers who hated Bernard because he had Jewish roots? Grow up, NAZI!'

Sad or what? Still, there's always the anti-fascist bloggers to attack. They're an easy target - or so Hill thought until he tried to drone on about Simone Clarke. Then he met Duncan Money...

'Anti-gag (Chris Hill) said... I saw you comment on the Fascist Lancaster UAF site, about the intimidation of Simone Clarke. Can I ask you why you do not totally condemn this attempt to intimidate a private citizen for using their democratic right to support, and join, any political party they wish. The fact that Simone Clarke kept her membership of the British National Party to her self, has in fact nothing to do with anyone else. Had she stood in the middle of Hyde Park, and screamed out her membership number, she should still not be subjected to this, or any other, type of intimidation. Every time this type of personal abuse occurs, it make decent people like myself sick, and even more determined to stand up and be counted.

Duncan Money said... Well if it isn’t Chris Hill, the prominent BNP member from Lancaster, masquerading online as ‘anti-gag’. I was wondering when you would get round to commenting on my blog, everyone else in the BNP seems to. There’s nothing like hijacking a thread that has nothing to do with you comment in order to post an infantile rant about events I have nothing to do is there? Why you should be so concerned about my views on this subject I don’t know.

Firstly, full marks for calling Lancaster UAF fascist that’s highly original. Now please demonstrate how Lancaster UAF is anti-Semitic, anti-Communist, espouses corporatist economics, is anti-democratic, highly nationalistic, authoritarian, connects nationality with race and is reminiscent of the movement Mussolini headed in Italy during the 20’s, 30’s and 40’s.

Can I ask you why you do not totally condemn this attempt to intimidate a private citizen for using their democratic right to support, and join, any political party they wish.

Such a loaded question Mr Hill. In amongst all that rhetoric I assume the question you are asking is why I didn’t condemn the decision by UAF to hold protests outside the English National Ballet following revelations that their principal dancer, Simone Clarke, is a member of the British National Party. I personally think that UAF is right to call protests and condemn this woman for her BNP membership. If you join a racist, fascist political party then you can be termed a racist and a fascist. Anyone has the right to hold whatever political views they want. However, Simone Clarke is not a private citizen is she? She’s the lead dancer at the ENB and the ENB is subsidised by the state as it receives £6 million of public money. Receiving public money means an organisation has to have certain responsibilities. One of the responsibilities of receiving money from the Arts Council is that work you produce contributes to racial equality and good race relations. Having a BNP member as your lead dancer is not contributing to racial equality, in fact it is detrimental. Simone Clarke is free to be a member of the BNP, although you would deport her partner, but she should not make her living in subsidised art.

intimidation… personal abuse

That’s strange I don’t remember anyone from the BNP hurrying to condemn all those on the far right, including BNP members, who threatened and abused me after I held a small anti-BNP meeting which is strange because ‘Dr Phil’ the BNP’s press officer had time to write 2 articles on me and my mate as well as spending 1 ½ hours on the phone to the local press complaining about us asserting we had been brain-washed.

it make decent people like myself

You wouldn’t happen to be a BNP member would you Mr Hill? And someone who has stood as a BNP candidate in elections? The fact that you belong to a party that wants to deport my friends excludes you from the category ‘decent people’. Anyway, since such a prominent BNP member has decided to comment on my blog I’ve a question to ask about another current issue. Following the formation of a far right group in the EU Parliament largely containing neo-fascists and Holocaust deniers the BNP heralded this with delight and called them ‘genuine patriots’ who any future BNP MEP’s would be happy to join. Is this what the BNP thinks patriotism is?'

Oops. No joy there then - but major kudos to Duncan.

As he can't string a reasonable argument together in support of the BNP, Hill has decided to go the other way and play dirty, hence the pointless fake blog he's started here (see picture above). Go and have a laugh at it. It's called 'Lancaster's United Again Fascists', whatever the hell that's meant to mean. Hill is a major embarrassment to the BNP - and given the competition he's got in the party that's no small achievement.

Poor old Hill. His desperation's showing and he's losing his grip. Never mind - there's bound to be a by-election that he can stand in and lose again soon. That might cheer him up.

Oh well, as Chris Hill doesn't apparently want to answer the question (see Comments) as to whether he is responsible for the fake UAF page (and the others he has created), we thought we'd provide the proof ourselves. Above is the Atom feed for the page and as you can clearly see, the post that has come down the feed was made by Chris Hill, using his Blogger log-in, 'anti-gag'.

Actually, we wonder why Chris Hill has a Lancaster BNP blog at all - the readership hardly shows a need for one. The list on the left shows his daily hits.

Our old Redwatch-organiser chum Little Kev reckons we only get fifty hits a day. If we did, we'd be ashamed and frankly, wonder if it was worth all the effort.

Chris Hill's crap blog manages an average of 16.7 a day (but then he only posts about once a month) and you really have to wonder why anyone would bother keeping it going. Oh well, keep on trying Chris.