As members of a so-called political party, you are expected to know a bit about the party hierarchy, structure and so on. Surprisingly, the BNP chooses not to tell its members very much about what goes on at any level, which is why someone was forced to ask on Stormfront a couple of days ago if Roy Goodwin had been booted out of his job after reading it here first (he has).
Given that your party squeezes as much cash as possible out of you via the high membership fees, the vast amount of tatty merchandise it tries to offload on you, its rubbishy Voice of Freedom 'newspaper' and the Red, White and Blue booze-fest and jumble sale, you might choose to wonder where all your hard-earned pennies are going. Some of these questions are pretty fundamental (like the first one) while others are just interesting (like the questions about Lee Barnes, the party's 'legal advisor').
Seventeen questions, more or less - and we defy you to answer more than two of them without having to knowingly lie.
Nick Griffin
1. How much is Nick Griffin paid per annum and how much are his expenses/travel?
2. Precisely how much does the party pay his wife, daughter, mother and father - and for what?
The rest
3. How much is the leadership team paid, per person?
Mark Collett
4. What exactly does Mark Collett do?
5. And why does the party employ a known Hitlerite and idiot?
Tony Lecomber
6. Is Tony Lecomber a member of the BNP right now?
7. Has he ever been a member of the BNP?
8. Why wasn't he thrown out after he proposed an assassination attempt?
Lee Barnes
9. Is Lee Barnes a member of the BNP?
10. Has he ever been a member of the BNP?
11. Has he really got a law degree?
Phil Edwardes
12. Has Dr Phil Edwardes actually got a doctorate?
13. If so, what is it in and where is it from?
14. And why has he got two names (Stuart Russell being the other one)?
Robert West
15. Has the insane fake-vicar Robert West resigned from the party?
Accounts
16. Where are the full accounts for Great White Records, Excalibur Promotions Ltd and the Trafalgar Club?
Security
17. Martin Reynolds is, we're told, paid more than £500 per week, which is a lot of membership fees. How much is paid for the entire security team including their Kray-twin overcoats, Raybans and bullet-proof vests?
There you go. Now let's see how many answers we get...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
62 comments:
I'm not a bnp member but i'll give it a go.
1 Too much
2 Too much
3 Too much
4 Fuck all
5 Because there Hitlerite idiots
6 Who cares
7 Dunno
8 See 5
9 Dunno
10 Dunno
11 I doubt it
12I doubt this too
13 See 12
14 Cos he's a piece of shit
15 Yes Cos he's a nutjob
16 You cant see them cos we're still thieving from them
17 Waaaaaaaay too much. £500???? For that fat bastard????
1. £900 per week, although i'm not sure about that.
4. produces leaflets, Identity magazine, etc
6. no
8. he was, although that reason wasn't given
9. no
10. no
11. Yes, an LLB from Kent University.
12. yes
13. in science (can't be more specific), don't know where from.
15. not that *you're* aware of, otherwise you'd have already written something about it.
anon 1
LOL. Very good
anon 2
You sound like you might possibly be a BNP member and it makes a change to get sensible responses to semi serious questions on this site though your wrong about Tony Lecomber as far as I know.
£900 a week? Bloody hell.
I've just read on one of those new blogs that have sprung up that Reynold's missus is in paid employment as Nick Griffin's membership or engagements secretary. You have to wonder about this lot...
Sorry, me again. She's the appointments secretary apparently, and that's said on the Britain Forward site. I know you don't like links to nazi sites so I shan't put one on - I'm sure you can find it if you need to. ;)
Quote
"Did Mrs Reynolds get the job of appointments secretary to Nick Griffin (shades of John Prescott?) on merit or because she is Martin’s wife, and how much is she paid?"
They obviously like your questions because they've copied some of them and asked a whole bunch of their own.
How much does it cost to wash Mrs G's giblets in that nice heated pond out the back?
There are some very pertinent questions there and I wish someone would come and answer all of them.
Anonymous said...
There are some very pertinent questions there and I wish someone would come and answer all of them.
Lol!
The way things are among the rank and file of the nutzis at the moment, so would most of them!
As a BNP member who is far from happy about the Griffin regime’s antics, here are my answers.
1. How much is Nick Griffin paid per annum and how much are his expenses/travel?
A: Don’t know. Whilst Griffin’s reform programme has led to a small amount of success, he certainly hasn’t earned the right to be paid £900 per week. Obviously any report from the UAF about the BNP has to be taken with a pinch of salt until proven but if Griffin is paid this much, he can kiss goodbye to my membership money in 2008.
2. Precisely how much does the party pay his wife, daughter, mother and father - and for what?
A: They shouldn’t receive anything IMO. Many members work hard for no money at all. They should do the same. As with the above allegation, I’ll be doing my best to find the answers to these very interesting questions.
3. How much is the leadership team paid, per person?
A: Don’t know but will be asking questions to find out.
4. What exactly does Mark Collett do?
He produces party leaflets and the Identity magazine to an extremely poor quality. His design work is awful and taking the embarrassing 2005 general election leaflets as an example, probably cost the party thousands of pounds in lost deposits. A properly designed and printed leaflet would have given many candidates an extra 1% or so, enough to save the deposit in many cases.
5. And why does the party employ a known Hitlerite and idiot?
A: He should have been booted out years ago. He’s a liability, not just because of his dreadful views, but because he’s uselss at his given role of Director of Publicity. A bit rich for someone who has brought the party nothing but bad publicity.
6. Is Tony Lecomber a member of the BNP right now?
A: I hope not. He’s a mug. I heard he isn’t anymore.
7. Has he ever been a member of the BNP?
A: You know he has.
8. Why wasn't he thrown out after he proposed an assassination attempt?
A: He should have been.
9. Is Lee Barnes a member of the BNP?
A: Don’t know. Not really bothered if he pays his £30 or not.
10. Has he ever been a member of the BNP?
A: Don’t know.
11. Has he really got a law degree?
A: Yes. One thing to be said for Lee Barnes, he brings a new angle of thinking to the party. His support of Israel was a very welcome break from the baseless anti-semitism shown by many party members who believe Israel controls the world, just because they read it on some tacky conspiracy website.
12. Has Dr Phil Edwardes actually got a doctorate?
A: Don’t know, don’t care.
13. If so, what is it in and where is it from?
14. And why has he got two names (Stuart Russell being the other one)?
A: Don’t know, don’t care.
15. Has the insane fake-vicar Robert West resigned from the party?
A: It wouldn’t be a great loss in my opinion
16. Where are the full accounts for Great White Records, Excalibur Promotions Ltd and the Trafalgar Club?
A: That’s exactly what I’ll be asking in future.
17. Martin Reynolds is, we're told, paid more than £500 per week, which is a lot of membership fees. How much is paid for the entire security team including their Kray-twin overcoats, Raybans and bullet-proof vests?
A: Again, I don’t know and wouldn’t necessarily believe it coming from UAF, but I’ll certainly be asking questions.
Reasonable answers for someone claiming to be BNP! If you are indeed in the party, thank you.
With regard to Martin Reynold's weekly £500, we're taking that figure from Joe Owens, Griffin's former bodyguard, who was pretty pissed off with the fact that he'd looked after Griffin for a couple of years for nothing then suddenly Warren Bennett dives in and is doing a far worse job for five hundred smackers a week. Assuming no increase in the last three years (very unlikely) the perverted Reynold's, the current head of security, is now earning that amount. In reality, he's probably earning a good deal more than that.
According to Joe's book:
'I carried on doing this unpaid security work until June 2004. Having heard that Griffin had taken on Warren Bennett (from Edinburgh) as BNP Security Chief, I then learned that Bennett was being paid. Now I found this rather strange: why would he appoint Bennett to a salaried position when I was doing the job for nothing? Bennett, a scaffolder by trade, had lost his job over football hooliganism and politics. Griffin had taken him on at £500 a week plus expenses (this is the figure I was given by Mark Collett, Dave Hanam [sic] and Mick Treacy...'
I haven't got a lot of sympathy for the likes of Joe Owens but you can understand his outrage.
i said earlier (2nd comment) that NG pays himself £900 per week, but think i may have got this wrong, and that the amount may actually be the equivalent of $900 per week, i.e. about £450 per week. (I was told this on the net by someone who claimed to asked him at the American Renaissance conference.)
Also, Robert West -- it was first rumoured that he had resigned months ago, but he's spoken at meetings since then, so the rumours were / are probably false.
I can't see Nick Griffin paying himself the same, and certainly not less than, his head of security. That seems unlikely to say the least.
What you write on this site will not stop the donations for the BNP coming in, it will not stop people joining the party and it will not stop people voting for them.BNP in government by the year 2015.
'What you write on this site will not stop the donations for the BNP coming in...'
Haven't you heard? The donations are fast drying up and the party is closer to bankruptcy than it's ever been. Griffin and his messing about with extremely dodgy fake companies (like GWR and Excalibur) is only speeding you down the path
'BNP in government by the year 2015.'
In your dreams.
You lot are a bunch of cunts
print that you fuckers
Okay, you sad twat.
As A BNP member I am waiting to see the grotty videos of Mrs Griffin.
I have known the pair of them for over 20 years now.
According to rumour here in sunny Oldham Nicks on £1200 plus expenses.
'As A BNP member I am waiting to see the grotty videos of Mrs Griffin.'
That sounds like a reference to the alleged affair with Collett? I think I'd rather miss that.
'According to rumour here in sunny Oldham Nicks on £1200 plus expenses.'
Actually that sounds about right if we assume Reynold's on £600 or so. Jeez, don't the bloody BNP even know how much the leader earns???
"Haven't you heard? The donations are fast drying up and the party is closer to bankruptcy than it's ever been."
This is certainly yht rumour at branch level and I can tell you that people have been asking some of the questions you posed for a while. I wish you better luck than we had in getting answers. When we asked we got called traitors.
I'm not a member any more by the way. I let my membership lapse.
Collett is crap at his job. Loads of branches missed out on leaflets prior to the elections.
Each of the steps taken by Griffin to take money out of the BNP is probably legal...in isolation...but taken together as part of a whole scheme, they may well amount to theft.
It all depends on intent. If dishonest from the outset, it is theft. If not, it is incompetence or a difference of opinion.
Proving intent or the state of an individual's mind is obviously difficult.
However, it can be shown by the combination of two or more actions that lead inevitably to a result.
If the board of directors of a limited company did the following:
gained election;
used office to promote their friends/relatives bypassing usual selection procedures based on assessment of merit;
(such as Mark Collett after incurring the PR disaster of 'young, nazi and proud')
changed internal rules to choke information channels to the shareholders;
witheld relevant information - ie information that would allow a proper assessment - from shareholders;
(such as full, open, audited accounts showing directors' fees etc)
changed rules by which others could seek election to office of director;
massively increased directors' fees without any corresponding increase in revenue that could be attributed to the actions/performance of the directors;
employed friends to do jobs with substantial salaries that had previously been done by others - not necessarily friends of the directors - with no salary;
then I guess that the DTI might well rule that such a board of directors had 'done a Maxwell'.
I refer not to the looting of the Mirror pension funds, but to Maxwell's previous behaviour in the late 1960s, when the DTI ruled that he was not fit to run a public company.
What Griffin is accused of doing is in fact very common; treating the money of members as their own. The founders or controlling members of small societies, be they local amateur dramatic or even small private limited companies or even large public limited companies - often do this. Think of what Conrad Black is accused of: treating company money, the money contributed by shareholders, as his own piggy bank. The local amdram society may be the victim of the same attitude, especially when the tresurer and secretary have held office for several years because nobody else can be bothered.
However, with companies, the list of shareholders is a public document. Any shareholder who believes the company is being run for the benefit of a few directors and not the benefit of all shareholders can
either
contact all the other shareholders to ask them to vote him onto the board of directors,
or
apply to the court to wind up the company compulsorily. This involves selling all the assets and distributing the proceeds to the shareholders.
Neither of these is available to BNP members.
Griffin appears to have done the following.
Packed the 'board of directors' or its equivalent in the BNP with his friends.
Restricted access by members to other members, by keeping the membership lists secret AND by restricting access to party publications. It is the combination of the two that is important. Either one on its own can be justified, but when acting together, they cannot.
Seized control of the rule book by which he can change the rules at critical moments - such as after nominations close and before any election contest starts.
The effect is to remove any real prospect of being held accountable for his actions.
Then he has done what he liked with the revenue.
What does this combination reveal about his intent?
A very comprehensive and interesting post.
What Griffin is setting Collett up for is very reminiscent of what happened to other people in "Attempted Murder"
Other than the fact that you are a bunch of frightened trot loons (with nothing better to do, since the revolution has been postponed, indefinately), why do you care about the internal workings of the BNP?
Shouldn't you be asking about the financial workings of Searchlight and the SWP-dominated UAF?
Much more pertinent (at least for you), I would think?
Who are you calling a fucking trot?!?
"Shouldn't you be asking about the financial workings of Searchlight and the SWP-dominated UAF?"
Why? They're not trying to run the country.
A trot loon? It sounds like something from the Industrial Revolution.
We're thinking of putting a sticky post up once every couple of weeks - something uncontroversial like this one. Good idea, do you think? It certainly seems to annoy the nazis, which seems to imply that it must be a Good Thing. :-)
Eek - according to denise's blog Sharon Ebanks' email has been hacked, and now it seems the BNP Leadership Challenge site has been emptied of all its posts. There seems to be a bit of serious attacking going on.
Apparently not.
"After speaking with a well respected member of the BNP we have decided to pull
this blog.
But we make it quite clear that the articles that were on this blog were just a
fraction of the corruption and seediness eating away at the BNP.
ALL OF THE ARTICLES WERE TRUE
Financial corruption, theft, and expulsions of innocent people who dare to ask questions must stop. And the BNP membership must demand its own self appointed
auditor who acts on their behalf and is their entitlement by law
There are many questions that have gone unanswered and as long as Griffin
remains in charge they will continue to go unanswered.
We were once proud to be members of the BNP but it is merely a shadow of its
former self.
To all those who thought they had joined something better vote Chris Jackson and
make it better.
Oh yeah, I forgot
"We're thinking of putting a sticky post up once every couple of weeks"
Good idea
Shame that sites gone it looked interesting. Yes the sticky looks like a great idea.
Anon said:
"What you write on this site will not stop the donations for the BNP coming in, it will not stop people joining the party and it will not stop people voting for them.BNP in government by the year 2015."
The victims/investors of multi level marketing and chainletter frauds go on a 'sucker list' to be sold to the next promoter of such a fraud. Why? Because the promoters know that many such victims prefer to hide from the truth that they have been foolish and greedy rather than face up to it. Such victims then go on to 'invest' in the next 'something for nothing' miracle money maker.
So too have thousands of nationalists.
Was the National Front led by John Tyndall a political party, in that its PRIMARY purpose was the pursuit of power? Or was it rather a list of subscribers to John Tyndall's privately owned magazine "Spearhead" ?
If it was a political party, then Tyndall would have happily donated all the profits from Spearhead and kept only a subsistence wage for himself.
All the parties led by John Tyndall - The British Movement, National Front, New National Front, BNP etc - were falsely named. The correct name was 'The John Tyndall Party'. As soon as he faced competition for the leadership, he reverted to type by publishing yet another scrawl on the so called 'jewish problem'. This caused an exodus leaving a rump of loyalists.
Has Griffin converted the BNP from John Tyndall's pension plan into a political party? Or into an even bigger pension plan for himself?
What do his actions - described by anon above - say?
The wailing and gnashing of teeth from outraged JT loyalists at these comments only reveal the emotional pain at facing up to personal foolishness.
It is easy to talk in childish hyperbole..."Victory or Valhalla" and other puerile nonsense...and rather more difficult and boring to run a serious political party with realistic and therefore humane policies and principles.
There are some bloody good posts on here. I think a "sticky" would be a great idea.
Not a BNP member, but once was, so my answers are as follows:
1. NG is PAID about £1,000 a month (quite reasonable). His EXPENSES seem to be about 75% of whatever the total party revenue is for that year.
2. No real idea, probably accounts for about 20% of the remaining 25%. His eldest daughter is, at least by title, a Young BNP leader and does a lot of stuff producing Welsh Language propoganda for the BNP. His mother runs the Trafalgar Club (or at least licks the stamps for its mailings) and his father sometimes answers the phone. His wife swans about feeling important.
3. Very little, I believe. Most seem to be on the dole and are getting small payments of £50 or £100 'beer money' to keep them on board the Griffin Wagon.
4. Makes an arse of himself on a regular basis. Once asked Griffin this very question, told he was 'really good at dealing with awkward interviewers' and that he did well 'for a youngster'. General feeling is that he is Griffin's new bit of rough.
5. Is this a serious question?
6. I think not.
7. Most definately yes.
8. Good question, only very bad answers.
9. Pretty sure not.
10. Again, pretty sure not.
11. He does have a law degree, an LLB, but he is not, as he ofton claims, a solicitor nor a barrister. The BNP is meant to be paying for his to get his qualifications and set up in some sort of legal business, but nothing seems to be taking place. In fairness, he is very intelligent, but, on the other hand, he is paranoid and delusional, probably just this side of being actually insane. Also a Griffin puppy, probably because of the carrot being dangled in front of him, to make him a 'proper' solicitor.
12. Most definately yes.
13. Sceince-based, but some sort of specialised mathematical thingy. Again, very intelligent, very high brow, but definately a Griffin puppy.
14. When he first got involved with the BNP he wanted to be anonymous, due to possible intimidation at work (his father sufferred the same when he was an NF candidate in, I think, Birmingham in the 1970's), so he used a non-de-plume. Since being 'outed' he has continued to use it.
15. Not that I had heard, but I have never met him, so I would hardly be the one to ask.
16. So far as any member (or ex-member) is aware, there is no such animal. Companies House have never seen them, nor the Electoral Commission, nor the party membership.
17. I doubt very much if he gets £500 a week, nor anything like it. He is, however, a bloody good bodyguard, looks the part (the pictures don't do him justice, he carries only a small amount of fat in general), a nice bloke, and doesn't deserve the shite he has been getting from the NNP camp. Granted, he makes himself an easy target, but he has a 'coulden't care less' attitude to most things. I consider him to be a good friend, his dogs even play with my dog, and they don't do that with many others! Total cost for security is astronomical, paid mainly, I suspect, as it fits in with Griffin's homo-erotic fantasies about strong men and uniforms, plus it makes him feel important.
'1. NG is PAID about £1,000 a month (quite reasonable). His EXPENSES seem to be about 75% of whatever the total party revenue is for that year.'
I don't believe the first sentence though I can well believe the second!
Nevertheless, excellent answers. Thanks.
Ahhhhh...the expenses....soooo thatz how the coffers are looted.
Taking a big salary displays your greed, while raiding the expenses hides it.
Trouble is that taking little 'extras' from the expense account is theft and it only needs a reasonably competent investigation to prove it.
Should Chris Jackson win, expect that reasonably competent investigation and then...if the accusation is true...expect to see NG in a stripey suit for a while.
If the accusation is not true, that investigation will simply allow for a more tightly run budget.
CJ should not trade that evidence for future co-operation from NG, but rather deal with NG after he is inside and has nothing to trade.
That last ex-BNP member post sounds like its from Cheetham.
Ahhhhh...the expenses....soooo thatz how the coffers are looted.
That figures, didn't the auditors say something about receits for day to day expenses nor being kept properly??
If you believe the money is drying up then the electoral commission website does not give the full picture.Donations coming in are small cash donations that do not have to be registered.Also collections may bring in hundreds and will not be registered either.These types of donations add to a substantial amount.So whileyou are spreading disinformation the money keeps rolling in.
'...the electoral commission website does not give the full picture.'
Well, no. Far from it from all I've heard and read (not just on this site either)
'Donations coming in are small cash donations that do not have to be registered.Also collections may bring in hundreds and will not be registered either.These types of donations add to a substantial amount.'
We're back to the old complaint that the branches are having to cough up to pay for the leadership's excesses and all the get rich quick schemes they think up are only going to plunge the party further into debt at the expense of the members.
'So whileyou are spreading disinformation...'
I'm no great supporter of sites like this but at least their allowed to talk about this stuff, which the members of the party arent.
'...the money keeps rolling in.'
Which implies that the leadership is spending it - fast. And to what end? The last elections which cost a fortune at branch level earned us NOTHING.
If the money keeps rolling in, that fact should be clear from a quick look at the accounts. Perhaps the massive amount of money coming in via donations and thieving from branches (and the many fake business ventures) is similar to the huge surge in membership that Griffin clearly stated had occurred after the London bombings a couple of years back - there wasn't a surge at all.
Perhaps you should ask your party leadership a few questions about the companies it's running. Where are the accounts, would be a good one. You might also like to consider how Nick Griffin would run the country in the extremely unlikely eventuality that he happened to be voted in. If his party can't even run a third-rate internet-based music company properly, how the hell would he do with the economy?
Your party's a bad joke and your party leader is a buffoon.
The Northwest nationalist site has a bit fromn this comments section on it, It agrees too.
Your party's a bad joke and your party leader is a buffoon.
Well said
I don't see what any of these things have to do with you lot. Join the BNP and you might find out the answers.
'I don't see what any of these things have to do with you lot.'
We're nosey. Indulge us.
'Join the BNP and you might find out the answers.'
I assume you're kidding...
That last ex-BNP member post sounds like its from Cheetham.
Nope, I'm definately not Cheetham, nor in any way involved with NNP.
All these sodding anonomouses are confusing the jhell out of me!
Re Anon of 10:19 AM, June 09, 2007:
"Your party's a bad joke and your party leader is a buffoon."
No, the BNP is not a bad joke, but neither is it a political party.
It is a collection of unwitting customers and unwitting unpaid sales staff for the NG pension fund.
Just as the members of AMWAY are customers and unpaid sales staff.
This explains why the BNP cannot operate with a committee or directorate in charge, but only with an all powerful 'leader' or dare I say 'owner'.
When previous parties, such as NF, had a committee or directorate in charge, they all fought each other like hell to get the top job. None would actually sacrifice their own ego or ambition for the good of the party or the good of the cause...because those at the top knew the cause was personal profit, not political power to 'save the nation'.
But only the revered leader, John Tyndall, actually made anything out of it.
So, it mattered not a jot nor a tittle to those in the ruling directorate how much damage their in fighting did to the cause of 'saving the nation' or to the party, because John Tyndall would not share it out and anyway they all of them wanted it all for themselves.
Better to have 100% of a small and splintered cake than sweet nothing of a large and growing cake.
If you want to achieve everything, then you have to risk everything. That means personal sacrifice that may never be recognised or even lead to anything. You have to risk wasting your whole life and being, if you want a mere chance of the greatest success.
None of the NF, BNP etc leaders have anything like the moral courage or commitment required.
Well thanks for your input everybody, whoever you are.
An interesting and enlightening thread and based on this experiment all at Lancaster UAF Towers think the occasional Saturday Sticky will be a good idea (though I think we'd appreciate a somewhat better choice of name).
If you have an idea for a topic or question, or fancy writing an article to start off the next Sticky, send it to us at lancaster.uaf@zen.co.uk
We look forward to your ideas, no matter how serious or silly. :-)
Johnc says the SWP are "not trying to run the country."
Thanks for the confirmation.
As for Searchlight: they are closer to the levers of power than you think!
'As for Searchlight: they are closer to the levers of power than you think!'
I'd rather have Searchlight pulling the 'levers of power' than any amount of your lot.
Really!
So you take back the "zionist" jibes then?
I have no idea what you're on about (and I don't much care).
1a,£175,000
1b, £38,000
2, wife £25,000 for keeping the minutes at meetings and fake secretarial work, Daughter keeps YBNP membership money,Father&Mother £15,000 for cooking the books and answering the phone.
3, Collett £15,000, Wingfield £15,000, Walker £15,000. The rest are part time so they can still claim benefits. Chris Beverly takes money out of Excalibur. Dave Hannam takes money out of GWR.
4, Nothing unless he's begged
5, He has too much info on Griffin to be dropped.
6, Yes
7, Yes
8, Because he's a Special Branch operative and so is Griffin.
9, No
10, No
11, No
12,
13,
14,
15, Yes, Griffin lied to him and let him down.
16, Being cooked by Edgar?
17, Zero to Reynolds, he's on full disability benefits as are some of the others. The rest are unemployed and get a tenner here and there.
Something you don't know
Griffin has used BNP membership money to buy properties in CROATIA
people who have facts should say what they are and then say who they are to give some creditability to what they are stating.i am keith axon .
i am still awaiting my kangaroo court ,disciplinary tribunal for posting on stormfront by saying ,its gon down that big black hole called hq expensises in relation to sharon ebanks expenses fund raised for her court costs but never paid .ps i was allso expelled from membership in 2006 as well on the basis of being a probationary member .i have never been aprobationary member ,i am a founder member since the bnps inception .fact ....keith axon
Hello Anonymous, here is a fact for you.
Mr Griffin won't allow his challenger the current membership list to enable him to collect signatures. What is the challenger supposed to do, guess who may or may not be a BNP member in Britain?
'...Reynolds, he's on full disability benefits as are some of the others. The rest are unemployed and get a tenner here and there.'
Is that so? And, more to the point, is it provable?
'Griffin has used BNP membership money to buy properties in CROATIA'
Now that is something we need more information on. We know he went to visit Croatia a while back and we heard some speculation but that sounds like a definite.
'i am still awaiting my kangaroo court ,disciplinary tribunal for posting on stormfront by saying ,its gon down that big black hole called hq expensises in relation to sharon ebanks expenses fund raised for her court costs but never paid'
As you already know, the disciplinary is never going to happen. Why don't you do a Tyndall and demand reinstatement via the courts. You don't need a solicitor so costs will be minimal (possibly the NNP could cover them - that'd make Griffin grind his teeth), and he'd have a fit! If nothing else, it would force discussion.
Bloody sad that BNP members have to come to an anti site to find information about their own party
"Griffin has used BNP membership money to buy properties in CROATIA"
I'm a BNP memer in Blackpool and I would like to see some proof of this. The person who said it seems tro know some detailed information so perhaps they know more. There will be a lot of questions about this if its true I can promise you that.
Just saw this on the stormfront forum
"Nick Griffin was declared bankrupt with debts of £70,000 on June 16th 1994 at Welshpool and Newtown County Court."
Interesting stuff
Post a Comment