Bosses at a South Yorkshire council have removed a far-right councillor from the authority after he failed to attend regular meetings.
John Gamble, who represented Brinsworth and Catcliffe, was elected in the seat for the British National Party in May 2008. But the 54-year-old, who later switched to the England First Party, has not attended for more than six months. During his time in office, he was able to claim £12,130 each year in allowances, the council said.
Mr Gamble, who won his seat from then Labour Mayor Allan Jackson by 61 votes, was due for re-election next May. He switched from the BNP to the England First Party in June 2009 before joining the openly-racist National Front in March last year, giving the far-right party its first elected representative for 35 years.
Announcing his second change of allegiance, Mr Gamble told The Star he had ‘jumped ship’ to the NF because he wanted to join a ‘more active’ organisation. When some of the NF’s recorded views were put to him, the Catcliffe and Brinsworth councillor said: “You have caught me somewhat flat-footed. I am not aware of the severity of these opinions.”
He added: “I am not racist, but on the far right. How can I be racist when I have had several coloured girlfriends?”
But Mr Gamble lost his position on the council after a lack of attendance led to complaints from figures, including former Brinsworth Labour councillor Reg Littleboy. Mr Littleboy said: “He is also being reported to the standards committee for abusing staff. He is a disgrace to Brinsworth and Catcliffe.”
A Rotherham Council spokeswoman for the borough council confirmed that Mr Gamble had been automatically disqualified from the council under the 1972 Local Government Act for failing to attend any meetings for six months. She said: “The disqualification will be officially reported to council at its meeting next Wednesday and the vacancy publicised shortly after. However, there will be no by-election for the vacant position because the vacancy has arisen within six months of the election for the seat in May, 2012.”
Mr Gamble said: “I don’t wish to comment.”
Sheffield Telegraph
December 12, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Seems to be a habit of theirs.
He added: “I am not racist, but on the far right. How can I be racist when I have had several coloured girlfriends?”
PMSL !
"Some of my best (girl)friends are coloured" !
He's had several coloured girlfriends ??? Looks more like David Furnish as an oap
BNP - EFP - NF now hes just K O'd
He is ex-BNP and yet didn't know the National Cunts are racist?
He's either a liar or thick as elephant shit.
He is ex-BNP and yet didn't know the National Cunts are racist?
He's either a liar or thick as elephant shit.
Probably the latter
A lot of the BNP councillors that were being elected at the BNP's high point weren't all that politically literate. They had little or no knowledge of the history and idealogy of British fascism, had some very wooly racist and populist ideas and stood as councillors because they were asked to. Frequently they'd stand after only after a few months of membership and would find themselves elected. The BNP would hold 'educationals' to try and inject some idealogy but would often be met with blank stares of incomprehension.
When things were going relatively well they'd stick around but as soon as the wheels came off the Griffin wagon they dropped out.
@ Anonymous 08:15 PM
A pretty good summary. Same thing happened with the NF in the mid to late '70s, except that they had no councillors.
NF meetings were filled with people who had a vague dislike of "foreigners" but no ideological grounding nor in most cases the capacity for it.
It would seem this is what happens when the far right enjoys some cyclical growth beyond its core 1000-1500 hardliners.
It would seem this is what happens when the far right enjoys some cyclical growth beyond its core 1000-1500 hardliners.
That's why they are very careful to limit internal democracy so the reins of power within the groups are controlled by actual fascists.
It's often dismissed as control freakery. That's superfically true but their are deeper political reasons behind it.
Post a Comment