Showing posts with label by-election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label by-election. Show all posts

January 31, 2011

BNP announces candidate in Illsley successor race

22 Comment (s)
A female community worker has been selected as the BNP candidate in the by-election to replace Eric Illsley.

Enis Dalton was announced as the candidate in a party meeting at Farm Road Working Men's Club in Kendray, attended by leader Nick Griffin. There had been speculation that he would be the candidate, compounded when the party's press spokesman refused to deny it last week.

Anti-BNP Protesters gathered outside the meeting.

Barnsley Chronicle

November 14, 2009

Glasgow North East by-election: BNP man finds his big talk contradicted by tiny vote

0 Comment (s)
The BNP's candidate in the Glasgow North East by-election, Charlie Baillie, was facing derision last night, after it emerged he had predicted the party's "best-ever result" an hour before he lost his deposit.

Mr Baillie, an electrical contractor from the south side of the city, told reporters just before 1am yesterday that the far-right party was about to make history. I am predicting that this evening we will produce the best result ever for the BNP in Scotland," he said. "I confidently predict we shall easily save our deposit and possibly more. Tonight will be the best result ever for the BNP in Scotland."

But at 2am, when the result was announced, Baillie's party was declared to have been beaten into fourth place by the Conservatives, securing only 4.92 per cent of the vote. Parties need 5 per cent to keep their deposits.

The BNP has failed to keep its deposit in any election in Scotland. Its tally of 1,013 votes was only 93 more than it won in the 2005 general election, despite the huge publicity generated for the party by the appearance on the BBC's Question Time programme of the party chairman, Nick Griffin.

The candidates of all the other parties staged a silent protest when Mr Baillie made his post-result speech on Thursday night, all walking off the stage as he began to speak. This meant that neither the Conservative nor Liberal Democrat candidate took up their opportunity to speak.

Amid heated exchanges afterwards, one BNP supporter was heard to shout at a black man watching the count: "Away hame. You'll never be British."

Scotsman

November 12, 2009

Glasgow North East heads to the polls

5 Comment (s)
Voters in Glasgow North East are heading to the polls today for a by-election triggered by former speaker Michael Martin's resignation in the wake of the MPs expenses scandal.

Political analysts have placed significant importance on the vote due to Labour's precarious standing in the polls and the fact the by-election will probably be the last before next year's general election.

Labour candidate Willie Bain received support from Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson this week, while members of the Cabinet have also visited the region during the last few days in an attempt to drum up support. Chancellor Alistair Darling and home secretary Alan Johnson both made the trip to Glasgow this week, while Gordon Brown visited last week. Scottish national party (SNP) candidate David Kerr has also welcomed party leader Alex Salmond to the region.

Thirteen candidates are standing in today's election, including Charlie Baillie from the British National party and former MSP Tommy Sheridan. Other 'celebrity' figures are also standing for election, including John Smeaton the baggage handler who became known around the world after confronting one of the Glasgow airport bombers, and Big Brother runner-up Mikey Hughes.

Labour heads into the election with a majority of some 10,000 votes from the 2005 general election. Lord Martin was effectively forced out as Speaker following the Daily Telegraph's explosive exposure of the lavish expenses claims made by some MPs earlier this year.

In the News

October 21, 2009

BNP loses another councillor

8 Comment (s)
A shock by-election has been called as a councillor has sensationally stepped down from his post as Camp Hill ward representative.

Darren Haywood has cited `job commitments’ as the reason why he has quit the role a little over a year after he was elected. This means that a by-election will now be held on Thursday, December 10 where people who live in the Nuneaton estate will go to the polls to decide who will represent them at the Town Hall. The 30-year-old’s decision to stand down means that the British National Party (BNP) now only has Barpool councillor Martyn Findley, in the council chamber.

The Nuneaton News has been told that candidates are expected to be put forward by the BNP, the controlling Conservatives and the opposing Labour group.

Mr Haywood’s sudden departure has come as `no surprise’ to the leading faces at the two main political parties, who have claimed that he did not carry out his duties properly to the people he was supposed to serve.

Andrew Burtenshaw, chair of Nuneaton Conservatives said: “The people of Camp Hill have been let down by a faceless BNP councillor. Up and down the country, BNP councillors have a shocking record of failing to deliver for the residents that they serve. In contrast, Conservative councillors in Nuneaton and Bedworth have been focussing on keeping our streets clear of crime and grime and delivering good value for money for our residents.

"People in Camp Hill will now have a choice between a Conservative council that has been spending residents’ money wisely, and a Labour party that spent 34 years allowing money to be frittered away on fountains and supaloos instead of getting the basics right.”

Councillor Dennis Harvey, leader of the Labour group, said that he knows only too well the lack of service given by Mr Haywood as he also represents the Camp Hill ward.

“This does not come as much of a surprise,” he said. “As far as I know, Mr Haywood has attended no meetings of the council since June and the BNP have shown an abysmal interest in representing Camp Hill since their candidate was elected in 2008. The Labour Party has always been at the forefront of representing the interests of Camp Hill and will continue to do so.”

Alwyn Deacon, West Midlands organiser for the BNP, defended Mr Haywood, saying: “I cannot believe that Labour and the Conservatives suggested that we are faceless, I could name some of their councillors who are just there to make up the numbers. He has resigned for his work commitments, he could have stayed on but he felt that it was only fair to give the electorate the choice to decide who they want to represent them because, as a result of his work, he was not able to do that. He has to work, he has a mortgage to pay and he didn’t think it was fair on the people of Camp Hill to suffer because of this.

“We expected to be criticised, we always are, but let me say this, when it came to fighting to try and stop the closure of the green grocers in Camp Hill, the BNP councillors stood shoulderto- shoulder with the people who were protesting. They also voted against an increase in councillor’s allowances and were the only councillors to give their increase to charity, namely the riding centre in Galley Common, so to say we have done nothing is a fabrication.”

Philip Richardson, assistant director for legal and democratic services at the borough council explained the by-election process.

“We are aiming to hold the byelection on Thursday, December 10 this year, to comply with government regulations,” he said. “Residents in the Camp Hill ward who have requested a postal vote will be receiving their forms shortly. They should complete these and return them to the council as quickly as possible.

Anyone who wishes to vote and who isn’t currently on the electoral roll must register by Wednesday, November 25.”

October 10, 2009

'BNP has right to hold its rally here'

21 Comment (s)
A British National Party rally is to be held in Cleveleys

Wyre's Labour Group has objected to the meeting, which will be held at the council-owned Frank Townend Centre on Beach Road at 7pm on Tuesday.

Nick Griffin, leader of the BNP, could be a speaker and the Labour group is worried there will be demonstrations. It has called for council bosses to step in and refuse permission for the rally – but Wyre Council has insisted the BNP has to be treated like any other political party before the Jubilee Ward by-election on October 22.

Labour group leader Coun Clive Grunshaw said: "Council premises should not be used in such a way during the middle of the Jubilee ward by-election. The Frank Townend Centre is in fact the site of the polling station for the by-election and giving permission for its use for political purposes at this time is clearly not appropriate.

"The fact is that Wyre Council is under no obligation to allow a political rally of this kind to take place on their premises. A rally by the BNP – which we believe to be addressed by Nick Griffin – will incite the inevitable demonstrations."

The Labour group also says it has concerns the community centre is in a densely populated area.

But Wyre chief executive Jim Corry said: "The BNP are a formally recognised political party and I am not going to make any distinction between them and any other political party when it comes to booking council facilities. I do not agree this will be viewed as the council giving tacit support to one particular organisation, not least as UKIP has booked the same venue on another occasion."

And the BNP branded the Labour group "undemocratic" by asking for the rally to be scrapped. BNP spokesman John Walker said: "The BNP is a mainstream political party, especially now in the North West we have a member of the European parliament. For the Labour group to ask for this meeting, which is a normal political meeting, to be banned is anti-democratic in the extreme."

Candidates for the by-election are James Clayton (BNP), Roy Hopwood (UKIP), Wayne Martin (Labour) and David Walmsley (Conservative).

Blackpool Gazette

April 15, 2009

Today's cancelled BNP meetings

0 Comment (s)
Tonight's by-election hustings cancelled

A debate between the candidates in the upcoming Wanstead by-election has been cancelled. The news comes in the wake of the police arresting a British National Party (BNP) canvasser last night for allegedly launching a racist tirade against a black woman.

However the hustings was called off before the news of the attack became public, due to fears that there "might be trouble" if it went ahead.

According to a list of BNP members that was leaked last year, only two people are registered supporters of the party in Wanstead out of a population of over 20,000. But organisers and speakers at the planned debate feared other BNP members from across the country may have turned up at the meeting to "hijack" it.

Tory nominee Alex Wilson said: "It's a great shame it has been cancelled, I was really looking forward to it. But the event has appeared on a number of unsavoury websites and many are worried the meeting could have turned nasty."

Labour candidate Ross Hatfull said: "The party line of the Labour group is not to share a platform with the BNP, but also there are a lot of people concerned there could be trouble if it went ahead."

Liberal Democrat nominee Kate Garrett said: "I think it's quite unfortunate it was cancelled. But if it had gone ahead there was a risk it might go the wrong way and end up being counter-productive."

Hope not hate

BNP meeting cancelled

A meeting of the BNP in Winsford has been cancelled. The controversial political party was due to meet at Winsford United FC tonight, Wednesday, but police confirmed this has now been cancelled.

Club secretary Bob Astles said: "One of our members asked if he could bring a few friends in for a meeting but we didn't know what it was. We are not a political club, we never have been. It's certainly not going ahead."

It is likely the meeting will now be moved to another location.

Winsford Guardian

November 14, 2008

BNP gain shock win in latest council by-elections

1 Comment (s)
The far-right BNP made a shock gain in the latest council by-elections. Mainstream party concerns will be revived by the result at Fenside, Boston Borough Council, Lincolnshire, which comes after a long period in which its votes appeared to have been contained.

Candidate David Owens polled 279 votes to win with a 138 majority over the ruling Boston Bypass Independent group. The party did not fight the ward in last year's main polls.

The BNP's vote share dropped in two other by-elections this week.

In a blow to Labour hopes of a further bounce after last week's triumph in the Glenrothes Commons contest, Tories held a marginal seat at Markfield, Stanton and Field Head, Hinckley and Bosworth Borough, Leicestershire.

Results:

Boston Borough - Fenside: BNP 279, Boston Bypass Independent 141, C 119, Lab 69, Ukip 24, Lib Dem 23. (May 2007 - Two seats Boston Bypass Independents 317, 315, Lab 174, C 134, Lab 116, Ukip 107). BNP gain from Boston Bypass Independent. Swing 4.6% Lab to C.

Darlington Borough - North Road: Lib Dem 561, Lab 262, C 115, BNP 106, Ind 60. (May 2007 - Three seats Lib Dem 930, 861, 836, Lab 401, 381, 296, C 193, BNP 168). Lib Dem hold. Swing 2.6% Lib Dem to Lab.

Hinckley and Bosworth Borough - Markfield, Stanton and Field Head: C 637, Lab 528, Lib Dem 390, BNP 263. (May 2007 - Two seats Lab 970, C 844, 840, Lab 639, BNP 371, Lib Dem 208, 122). C hold. Swing 2.2% Lab to C.

Wokingham District - Coronation: C 850, Lib Dem 675, Ukip 74. (May 2007 - C 1133, Lib Dem 802, Ukip 103, Lab 92). C hold. Swing 2.2% C to Lib Dem.

24dash

November 12, 2008

BNP force by-election in Kells

0 Comment (s)
The British National Party (BNP) is to stand in Kells ward, Whitehaven, after demanding a by-election is run to fill the seat left by the late Joe McAllister. The by-election has been called for the vacant position of county councillor for the ward of Kells and Sandwith. It has been called for Thursday, December 18, and nominations close at noon on Friday, November 21.

The ballot follows the death of Coun McAllister in July. He had been Labour councillor for Kells and Sandwith since 1995.

At that vote, Labour polled 1,367 votes and independent journalist Gordon Brown pipped the Conservatives at the polls with 357 votes compared with 355 polled for Leah Higgins.

Copeland Labour Party vice chairman Alan Alexander said Labour would be vigorously defending the seat. He said: “The BNP are a legally constituted party who often pretend to campaign on local issues whenever they put up candidates. But whenever you discuss issues with them, their true racist views always come to the fore. Having just marked Remembrance Day when we remember those who died fighting fascism, it is an insult to us all that people with the BNP views should be standing politically in our community.”

David Gray, speaking on behalf of the Conservatives, said they “expected to contest the Kells seat”.

Clive Jefferson, Copeland organiser for the BNP, said his party would contest the seat and had started campaigning. He said: “The powers that be didn’t want to have this election, they fully intended to leave the seat vacant until next June, when all the county seats are up for re-election. Well it is not in my nature to allow the complacent establishment – the old boys’ club – to ‘agree’ not to have an election, because it doesn’t suit their winter holiday calendar.”

The Whitehaven News

January 11, 2008

Ibstock and Heather by-election: alarm bells still ringing in East Midlands

17 Comment (s)
Badly in need of an electoral lift to rally the troops at a time of bitter internal division, the Griffinite BNP has descended en masse to the unassuming Leicestershire villages of Ibstock and Heather, where an otherwise unremarkable local by-election is being fought on Rebel BNP turf.

It's been a long time since the BNP poured resources on the scale it has into a by-election, and the clear intention is to take full advantage of the groundwork done by those now in the rebel camp to produce a stunning result for which the Griffin faction will take full credit.

Ibstock and Heather is a ward of North-west Leicestershire District Council, and squarely in a triangle of the East Midlands which - as we have been noting for some time - has been producing some of the best BNP election results in the country, in large part due to the organisational abilities of the expelled Sadie Graham.

Though we don't know what part the local rebel BNP has played in the election, it seems that the Griffinite BNP has taken it out of their hands, loyalists from as far afield as Newcastle being roped in to help. What candidate Ivan Hammonds makes of it all and where his sympathies lie is anybody's guess.

Ibstock is a large-ish former mining village, while Heather once enjoyed the close-by delights of an open-cast coal-mine. Both were also concerned with brick-making, of which industry the Ibstock Brick Company is a notable survivor.

The disappearance of the mines has seen steady demographic change in the district, North-west Leicestershire producing one of the most extraordinary results of the May 2007 local elections, when Labour were swept aside in a tidal wave of Conservative gains.

With 21 councillors and a majority of 4, Labour lost 16 seats, while the Conservatives, starting with 12, gained 15 for a majority of 16. While the Liberal Democrats remained unchanged on 3, others lost 1, with one remaining - and the BNP gained 2.

Thursday's by-election was called following the death of the sole sitting Labour councillor.

Ibstock and Heather is a multiple-member ward, voting as follows in May:

Con 737/731/599
Lab 707/620/559
UKIP 411
LibDem 225/222

The UKIP is not fighting this by-election, stoking BNP expectations of cleaning up their vote in a four-cornered Con/Lab/LibDem/BNP fight.

The BNP has for some time resisted the temptation to publicise its expectations, almost certainly because it so rarely meets them. Martin Wingfield is decidedly guarded, preferring to quote campaign manager Wayne McDermott's positive assessment and a Vote-2007 forum poster who predicted a 15-20% BNP vote. Wingfield is left to bemoan the fact that he has been refused membership of the Vote-2007 site, which might have something to do with the fact that the administrators of Vote-2007 have no intention of opening themselves up to the attentions of the BNP's keyboard army (and the fact that a little bird warned them...).

We would find it very difficult to believe that the BNP's minimum expecation can be anything less than 20%, and in all probability, given the resources they have expended, 25%. Nor would we, given the BNP's first-time performances in this area, be completely surprised if the BNP were to achieve the higher figure.

NW Leicestershire DC Ibstock and Heather ward result (percentages in brackets):

Con 515 (22.47)
Lab 699 (30.50)
L-D 441 (19.24)
BNP 637 (27.79)

Total 2292

Turnout 40.37%.

While the Labour vote (though down) has held up remarkably well, it is all too clear that the BNP has swallowed up the UKIP vote and persuaded a good proportion of Conservative voters into their camp.

We have to admit that this is a poor result for anti-fascism, especially as the Liberal Democrats (who did increase their vote) delivered anti-BNP literature to most households.

The questions now begin: what will this result pressage for the BNP's internal divisions? Nothing is more certain than that the Griffin camp will shout it to the heavens and gleefully highlight the lack of direct involvement by Sadie Graham and her supporters (even if that isn't quite true). And perhaps the Graham camp will hit back by highlighting the Griffinite BNP's hijacking of the campaign. To most BNP members, though, the result will be seen as a near-miss on new ground, and thus a success.

For us, a very loud alarm bell continues to ring in the East Midlands, but - the BNP did not win, and I am now reliably informed by a local correspondant that in the later stages of the campaign they became increasingly confident that they would (though they were careful not to say as much). And they must improve upon or at least defend their vote when Ibstock and Heather is next fought to give substance to their repeated claims of electoral progress, something the BNP has so far signally failed to do.

January 04, 2008

Welham Green by-election: BNP fails to impress

32 Comment (s)
It is the election nobody wanted - except for the BNP.

Exploiting an anomaly that allows just two registered voters to demand a by-election in a vacant borough/district council seat (even a lowly parish council requires ten), the opportunist British National Party has been crowing for some time over its "success" in forcing Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council to hold an election for a vacancy in Welham Green ward - an election the Borough Council claimed would be costly and pointless, since the seat must be fought again in May.

The vacancy came about when one of two sitting Conservative councillors resigned after facing allegations of possessing child pornography, allegations repeated by many foot-soldiers of the BNP's online keyboard army as if they were court-tested fact. Given the allegations currently swirling around two leading members of the BNP, this is dangerous territory for them to venture into.

Welham Green is a village lying just to the south of Hatfield, Hertfordshire. Sometimes (to much local resentment) known as North Mymms, the place is prime commuter country, comfortably well-off and with house prices to match. Its main claim to fame seems to be an occasion in 1784, when Vincenzo Lunardi, undertaking the first ever balloon flight over England, touched down at Welham Green to let off his airsick cat.

Welham Green and Welwyn and Hatfield district generally being low on crime and scarcely touched by immigration, the make-it-up-as-you-go-along BNP urgently needed an issue and decided, against all the known evidence, that crime in the area was rising - a lie that did not especially please Hertfordshire Police, as we reported here.

This can hardly have done the BNP any favours, but then nor can a BNP-forced by-election fought over the Christmas and New Year holiday period have greatly pleased the council-tax payers of Welham Green, who cannot have welcomed the sight of BNP canvassers on their doorsteps in the midst of the festivities.

The first inkling that the previously disinterested BNP had an interest in calling a by-election for Welham Green came on this forum from the poster "clarebear", posing as somebody concerned with "democracy". The mask soon slipped as "clarebear" replied thus to a suspicious contributor: "I would have thought that anyone who subscribes to the activities and publications put out by the Far left extreamist organisation Searchlight (which you seem to be promoting in your avatar) would understand how the democratic process is so important in defeating the slide towards facism and that any attempt to deny the electorate their right to an election is just that" (authentic BNP spelling preserved).

Soon after the penny drops that "clarebear" is not only BNP, but is almost certainly the BNP's candidate, Mark Fuller - who, despite his alleged concern for "democracy" and the greater good of Welham Green gives an address in Welwyn Garden City.

Apart from this attention-seeking intervention, the BNP has little history in Welwyn and Hatfield, and did not contest any seats in the May local elections, when sixteen council places were fought.

Welwyn and Hatfield Borough Council is divided into 17 wards electing 48 councillors. The council has a virtually unassailable Conservative majority, the Tories currently having 34 seats (+ 1 vacancy), Labour 10 and the Liberal Democrats 3. In May 2007 the Conservatives gained two seats from Labour and ousted the sole Green representative, while the Liberal Democrats remained unchanged. In May 2008 all 48 seats will be up for election due to boundary alterations.

Welham Green was last fought in 2006, with this result (percentages in brackets):

Con 707 (66.64)
Lab 198 (18.66)
LibDem 156 (14.70)

As "clarebear"/Fuller intimates on the forum linked to above, the BNP clearly hopes to exploit the scandal surrounding Welham Green's resigned councillor, and is perhaps hoping that a Christmas/New Year election will see a dire turnout work to its advantage.

We think otherwise. We believe that in forcing this unecessary by-election the BNP has shot itself in the foot, but given that this is new BNP ground, and that Labour has little chance of denting the Tory majority, the racist party might expect to gain votes from both. In solidly Tory seats it is usually the Liberal Democrats who benefit from Conservative strife, and as the LibDems have mounted an especially active campaign, they have the most to gain in Welham Green.

We have been unable to glean any exact indication of the BNP's expectations, but their trolls doing the rounds of the forums seem to be pitching a good second place as the likely outcome, which suggests a 20%+ target as they must know they need better than Labour's 18.66% to come anywhere near to even a bad second place.

Welwyn and Hatfield BC Welham Green ward result:

Con 539 (40.68)
LibDem 484 (36.53)
BNP 214 (16.15)
Lab 88 (6.64)

Turnout 46.6

The Tories duly suffered for the allegations against their former councillor, and as we expected it was the Liberal Democrats who benefitted most - though the size of the swing in their favour comes as a surprise even to us (as does the size of the turnout on such a dismally cold day). The squeeze on Labour seems to have come mostly from the LibDems but partially from the BNP, which clearly drew off some disaffected Tory voters.

We know that the BNP went to great lengths to mobilise its vote in what it (and, admittedly, just about everybody else) predicted would be a low-turnout election, which suggests that 16% is towards the higher end of what the party can expect in Welham Green and places like it when the mainstream parties take the BNP threat seriously and motivate voters to block its progress. In this case the hard work was done by the Liberal Democrats, but the local Tories cannot be faulted for never disguising their distaste for the BNP.

This by-election did not go quite according to plan for the BNP. It loudly sought the credit for calling it, believed it could cash in by myth-making about crime, and thought it could make capital on the back of as yet unproven allegations against the former sitting councillor.

It was wrong.

That, however, should not blind us to the fact that had this by-election not been so hard-fought between the Tories and the LibDems, producing an extra 264 voters over the 2006 turnout, then the BNP would almost certainly have bettered 20%.

Vigilance remains the watchword.

December 07, 2007

Sandwell disaster - BNP routed

23 Comment (s)
Working on the principle that in the expectation of bad political news it sometimes pays to get one’s excuses in first, the editor of the BNP’s monthly “newspaper” Voice of Freedom, Martin Wingfield, admitted that yesterday’s self-inflicted by-election in Sandwell’s Prince’s End ward “will be a very difficult one for the British National Party to gain any satisfaction from”.

Wingfield added: “Our excellent candidate Karen Parkes, faces the almost impossible task of trying to defend the Prince’s End seat on Sandwell Borough Council.”

As pre-emptive damage limitation goes this was rather excessive, since even the lowliest political activist is not going to tell the world that an election his party is contesting has been lost even before a vote has been cast.

We would have thought that the editor of the BNP’s most important interface with the general public should have known better, but Wingfield’s lack of propagandist skills and gaffe-prone nature were in evidence again when he told visitors to his blog: “When they [new BNP recruits] come from the Tories, I tend to think ‘I wonder what they are after?’ I’m afraid I can find little in common with people who belonged to a Party that sold off this country’s ‘family silver’ and essential services to private and in many cases foreign concerns.”

Still, in a party where the leadership can and has referred to dues-paying members as “vermin” we suppose Wingfield’s insulting of a large swathe of the BNP’s membership counts as small beer.

Not that Wingfield hasn’t been on the end of an insult or two himself. From Searchlight we pinch this delicious quote: “Wingfield also spent a brief spell ‘inside’ for non-payment of a Race Act fine. While this was the correct thing to do, his main motivation was to make himself a martyr and boost his popularity in preparation for the factional struggle which he was already planning.”

Author: Nicholas Griffin, recalling one of the many destructive spats on the far-Right in which he always contrived to play a pivotal role.

All highly entertaining, but not entirely relevant to Sandwell’s Prince’s End ward by-election, brought to us courtesy of a more humble but no less colourful cast of BNP characters.

Sandwell exists only in a political sense. Cobbled together from bits of Staffordshire and Worcestershire, it came into being with the local government reforms of 1974 and formed part of the unpopular and now defunct West Midlands County.

A unitary authority, Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council encompasses Tipton, Smethwick, Oldbury, Rowley Regis, Wednesbury and West Bromwich. Sandwell sits squarely in what is still known as the Black Country, a name gained due to the disfiguring effects of smoke and pollution in the district’s industrial heyday. The intense concentration of heavy industry which once characterised the area is long gone, and Sandwell in particular suffers from higher than average unemployment levels.

The most recent available figures give the population of Sandwell as almost 80% white, 14% Asian, with the remainder made up of Afro-Caribbeans, people of mixed-race race, and “others”.

Large-scale immigration began in the early 1960s, which, together with steady industrial decline and increased competition for jobs and decent housing, led to some notoriously racist west Midlands election campaigns, most notably that of Conservative Peter Griffiths, contesting nearby Smethwick in the 1964 general election campaign with the infamous slogan “If you want a ni**er for a neighbour, vote Labour”.

Griffiths won.

Despite that legacy, and the attempts of far-Right groups such as the original version of the British National Party and Colin Jordan’s National Socialist Movement to cash in, racist politics did not take off in the west Midlands. In the 1970s the National Front had an organisation in the area, but it was never electorally successful, splitting badly in the 1975/6 National Front/National Party division, and suffering further losses as individual members drifted towards Mrs Thatcher’s revitalised Tories.

It would be many years before the racist politics of the extreme-Right would enjoy success in that part of the world.

The BNP won its first seat on Sandwell MBC in May 2004, the candidate being the interesting James Lloyd, of whom more anon, and the ward he fought being Prince’s End.

In May 2006 Lloyd was joined by three more newly-elected BNP councillors, two of which might be described as “interesting” - Simon Smith and Russell Green.

Smith became known for Holocaust denial, UFO belief, and telling the Nazi Stormfront website that “The reason why Blacks disproportionately don’t vote is that the frontal part of the brain associated with postponing immediate gratification is not so well developed as in other races”, as we reported here.

Smith also achieved notoriety when he was suspended for publishing “hateful and abusive” material on his council-owned webpage, and for staging a walkout during a council vote to elect a Sikh as mayor of Sandwell .

Unfortunately for Smith, he backed the losing candidate in the BNP’s rigged leadership contest and was one of the first casualties in Nick Griffin’s purge of the vermin.

So far, so unlovely.

Of Russell Green, this month’s Searchlight has this to say:

One of the BNP’s two remaining Sandwell councillors has done little to distinguish himself since his election in May 2006 but does have some interesting links on his official council website. Under the heading “My Politics”, alongside the websites of the BNP and its front groups, Civil Liberty and Solidarity, Russell Green lists the aptly named “Conspiracy Planet”. This site espouses pretty much every lunatic nazi and antisemitic conspiracy going, including that the 9/11 terror attacks were an “inside job”. Also there is “The Truth Seeker”, which carries articles that suggest HIV is a harmless virus and does not cause Aids, claims to reveal the secret powers behind the Vatican and argues that Jewish bankers brought Hitler to power.

Which brings us back to James Lloyd.

Lloyd ran one of the most disorderly public houses in the West Midlands, Sandwell Council stripping the then Councillor Lloyd of his licence after a series of violent incidents. Lloyd’s woes didn’t end there. He found himself embroiled in a council voting scandal, and his son Ricky, a local ne’er-do-well, was returned to prison after committing offences while out on licence.

But all’s well that ends well. In October Lloyd was ejected from his Prince’s End seat for non-attendance at council meetings, necessitating a by-election.

The BNP last fought Prince’s End ward in May, their candidate being Karen Parkes, who stood again for the BNP last night. The result then was (percentages in brackets):

Lab 898 (35.71)
Con 498 (19.80)
Ind 241 (9.58)
BNP 878 (34.91)

Total 2515

Parkes came within twenty votes of taking the seat, but fortunately signs of electoral reverse had set in for the BNP, notably in the West Midlands, where it fell back by thousands of votes. This had just enough effect to deny Parkes a seat.

Voters are certain to punish the BNP for the actions (and lack of them) of the errant James Lloyd, the question being - how badly? For us this complicates the task of separating out the anti-Lloyd backlash from the general downturn in the BNP’s electoral fortunes.

Sandwell Prince’s End ward by-election result:

Lab 796 (48.07)
Con 517 (31.22)
LibDem 29 (1.75)
BNP 314 (18.96)

Total 1656

A comprehensive and well-earned defeat for the BNP, with Labour and the Conservatives gaining in roughly equal measure from the BNP’s dramatic loss of votes. It is also crystal clear that Liberal Democrat voters, knowing their candidate had little hope of success, swung behind Labour and the Tories to keep the BNP out.

Our feeling is that 10-12% of the BNP’s lost votes can be attributed to the bad publicity generated by Lloyd (not helped by Smith and Green), but that the remainder can be ascribed to the general downswing in their electoral fortunes over the past months.

Under normal conditions, and without the antics of Lloyd, it is difficult to believe that the BNP could have come anywhere near winning this seat.

There is a lesson to be gleaned from all this. Looking at the sharp increase in the Conservative vote, don’t all those ex-Tory BNP members insulted by Martin Wingfield have a sneaking sense that they’d have been better off staying where they were?

November 23, 2007

Rhiw by-election pain for BNP

17 Comment (s)
Conwy County Borough Council is, by any measure, the sort of political arena commentators like to call "interesting".

Sitting on the North Wales coastal belt, Conwy CBC was formed in 1996 with the merger of Aberconwy and Colwyn district councils. It serves a diverse population of indigenous Welsh and English incomers, and some of the most spectacular scenery in the British Isles falls within its borders (35% of its area comes within Snowdonia National Park).

Over 80% of the population live in the coastal strip, with nearly half of those classified as "British" being born outside Wales (mostly English). There are also a substantial number of East European (mostly Polish) migrant workers. About a third of the total population claim to be Welsh speakers, an incidence well above the national average of 20%.

Since its inception Conwy CBC has never fallen under the control of a single political party. There are 59 councillors elected from 38 wards, the majority of these wards squeezed into the narrow coastal strip from Bryn in the west to Kinmel Bay in the east. The full council is elected every four years, the next election being in May 2008.

The May 2000 local elections returned a council composed as follows:

Labour 19
Independents 15
LibDem 13
Plaid Cymru 7
Conservative 5

The current council (ignoring by-elections) is composed as follows:

Independents 17
Conservative 14
Labour 12
Plaid Cymru 11
LibDems 4
Vacancy 1 (Conservative).

Bearing in mind that the last full council election took place in 2004, the decline of Labour and the descent into near-irrelevance of the Liberal Democrats as a result of growth by the Tories and Plaid is striking. There have been seven by-elections for Conwy CBC since 2004, three being won by the Conservatives, two by Plaid, and one by Labour, which regained its own seat in Mochdre in September.

The Mochdre by-election saw the first attempt by the BNP to make an impact with Conwy CBC voters. It was a dismal failure. The racist party scraped together 35 votes, or less than 5.3%, in a low-turnout four-cornered (Lab/Con/PC/BNP) contest.

Next door to Mochdre is Rhiw ward, a well-to-do part of Colwyn Bay where the most pressing recent issues affecting the community were drug dealing on The Heights, followed closely by complaints of football-playing youths damaging plants in a local park and speeding traffic.

Rhiw ward also owns the distinction of having had two Conservative councillors removed from their seats for non-attendance in the last six years. In early October Councillor Steven Woolfe was forced to resign by fellow Tories, having failed to attend council business since March while continuing to claim thousands of pounds in allowances.

Woolfe's enforced resignation has caused a by-election which has attracted the attentions of the BNP.

In May 2004 Rhiw voted as follows (percentages in brackets):

Con 1003 (22.61) Elected
Con 751 (16.93) Elected
Con 739 (16.66)
Ind 502 (11.32)
Ind 337 (7.60)
PC 760 (17.13) Elected
Lab 344 (7.75)

Total 4436

Untangling those results is something of a nightmare we don't propose to enter into, but clearly Rhiw is comfortably Conservative.

And, like Conwy CBC elections generally, interesting.

In March 2006 a by-election attracted only two candidates. Perversely, Plaid Cymru, which had won a Rhiw seat in 2004 did not stand, while the Liberal Democrats, absent in 2004, did. The result was:

Con 716 (59.92)
LibDem 479 (40.08)

Total 1195

The winning Conservative was the disgraced Councillor Woolfe.

The line-up for yesterday's by-election saw the return of an Independent candidate and the intervention of the Greens and the BNP - but again Plaid Cymru and Labour failed to contest.

(To digress, the stay-at-home blinkered BNP blogger, full-time idiot, fame-seeker and Griffin sycophant we know and ridicule as Green Arrow has suggested that Conspiracy Central - the Tri-Axis Parties of Evil to him - arranged matters so that Labour did not stand as a ploy to keep the BNP out. So that solves that little conundrum. No doubt Plaid were in on it too...)

The BNP's candidate is John Oddy. As we've been noticing in our by-election reports, Oddy's campaign is a direct appeal to middle-Wales, calling for increased policing, a halt to the closure of sub-post offices and other harmless gestures that carefully avoid mentioning the BNP's more notorious policies.

Whatever the BNP's expectations are, no hint of them has slipped out, but we believe they will call anything better than Mochdre's 5.3% a "success", and may come in above the Greens.

The eclectic electoral history of Rhiw ward, the disarray of the local Conservatives - and the fact that the behaviour of a disgraced Tory brought about the by-election - should see a more open contest, especially as the Liberal Democrats, desperate to arrest their decline, have been fighting a determined campaign with former Rhiw councillor Trevor Stott as their candidate.

Conwy CBC Rhiw ward by-election result:

LibDem 548 (44.26)
Con 513 (41.44)
Ind 80 (6.46)
BNP 61 (4.93)
Green 36 (2.91)

Total 1238

An unsurprising - if narrow - victory for the Liberal Democrats, then. The only (very) cold crumb of comfort the BNP can take from their abysmal performance is that they came in ahead of the Greens. Perhaps this is what Nick Griffin and his acolytes mean when they chant their mantra about the BNP's "unstoppable" electoral progress.

To anybody else it looks like a complete standstill.

Postscript

For reasons best known to himself, the man who keeps Nick Griffin alive through the power of prayer, Green Arrow, jumped the gun by a considerable distance in his eagerness to be the first to publish and comment on the BNP's Rhiw performance, making a complete fool of himself in the process.

It seems that some little devil fed the hapless Green Arrow a fake set of results, which he promptly posted on Stormfront and his own blog, with the following comments:

So more new BNP members have been blooded and gained experience in fighting a by-election and I for one think they done rather well. Better than well. Bloody excellent in fact.

Rhiw, has always been a firm Conservative stronghold but the Liberal Democrats had come second last time out and have spend vast sums of both time and money in fighting this campaign and bussed in activists from all over the Country. So determined were they this time to put up more than a good show and there hard work paid off. But boy, did our lads give them a run for their money. Next time. Next time.

Full Results were as follows:-


Lib Democrats 635
Conservative 620
BNP 599
Ind 104
Green 47

Good work was done on the ground by the BNP activists led by their Candidate John Oddy and much information was gained at street level of those who currently support the BNP and those who might consider voting BNP and notes made of those who would never vote for a True British patriotic party like the British National Party.

A special mention to young Joe Llwelyn Griffiths who stood for the Green Party and his vegan friends who swamped this site with posts earlier today on why eating meat was wrong. Get some bacon butties into you boys. You need energy in this game, not just dreams.

Well done also to all the voters who put their trust in John. You at least have awoken to the dangers facing Our Country. Now please wake up just a few more of your friends. With your continued support the BNP will prevail.

Not being electorally savvy, the Green Arrow failed to smell a rat, the rat being that it was vanishingly unlikely that the BNP would score 5.3% in Mochdre ward in September, yet suddenly leap to nearly 30% on a first outing in next-door Rhiw just two months later.

An embarrassed Green Arrow was forced to admit on Stormfront, "Looks like I was well stiched up."

According to him: "Around about 01:00 I posted on here [Stormfront] that I was only staying up waiting for the RHIW results. At around 01:30 I received a comment on GA, from a person using an identity that I believed to be a true comrade giving me the results."

Which just goes to show, Green Arrow, that you really shouldn't believe everything you read on a blog.

Especially your own.

November 02, 2007

Sutton West by-election result nothing for BNP to write home about

3 Comment (s)
Just one contested by-election to report on this week, in the Sutton West ward of Ashfield District Council, where a vacancy arose following the resignation of a sitting Independent for abusive conduct.

Sutton West ward is part of Sutton-in-Ashfield, which sits hard by Mansfield and is just to the north of the BNP's Sadie Graham's Broxtowe stamping ground. In May it returned three Independent candidates - though - curiously - four vied for the three available seats, all of them coming ahead of the three Labour candidates, who in turn pushed the lone Tory into last place.

The lack of equilibrium in the number of candidates taking the field (4-3-1) as against the number of seats contested for (and the not exactly united platforms of the Independents) makes vote-averaging something of a nonsense, but the bald figures for May were as follows (percentages in right column):

Ind 1359 19.18
Ind 1119 15.79
Ind 1006 14.20
Ind 845 11.92
Lab 748 10.55
Lab 747 10.54
Lab 644 9.09
Con 619 8.73



Total 7087

Independents loom large on Ashfield District Council, forming the biggest voting bloc with 12 seats (though two Independents account themselves as "Selston Area Independents Putting People First"). Labour and the Liberal Democrats follow with nine seats each, and there are just three Tories.

Though the BNP did not fight any of Sutton-in-Ashield's four wards in May, they did contest six (out of fifteen) other Ashield D.C. wards (most of them multiple vacancy), fielding a single candidate in each. Their results were mixed but far from discouraging:

Hucknall West 10.8% (8th of 8)
Jacksdale 24.3% (3rd of 3)
Kirkby Central 27.0% (4th of 5)
Kirkby East 20.7% (3rd of 7)
Kirkby West 19.0% (3rd of 7)
Underwood 16.1% (3rd of 5 - complicated by the presence of an English Democrat candidate.)

Kirkby-in-Ashield, where the BNP fought all three wards, is just to the south of Sutton, and - though we cannot be entirely certain - is perhaps the best guide to the BNP's hopes in Sutton West, where their candidate was Michael Clarke, who contested Kirkby West in May. Publicly, the BNP has been uncharacteristically mute on its Sutton West expectations, but we do know that 15% is the target figure - a nice, artificial safe-zone figure put about purely with the morale of the BNP membership in mind: something to shout about if exceeded, and easily explained away if not.

Ashfield D.C. Sutton West ward result:

LibDem 873 37.02
Lab 560 23.75
BNP 321 13.61
Ind 275 11.66
Con 257 10.90
Green 72 3.05



Total 2358

The turnout was 26.5%.

The intervention of the winning Liberal Democrat was clearly catastrophic for the Independent candidate, losing badly in a ward with a history of electing non-party candidates, but was there anything here for the BNP to cheer about?

Their 13.61% puts them firmly in that nice, safe zone, and they can (and will) trumpet the fact that they bested the Independent (though his defeat came mainly at the hands of the LibDems), and particularly that they bested the Tories. But though third place is all well and good, the party still fell short of its own expectations - and in a week when immigration has been so much in the news their hopes of exceeding 15% must have been high.

If less than 14% is the best the BNP can do in Sutton West in these circumstances then it's unlikely they will ever be in a position to mount a serious challenge for the ward. Last night's BNP result suggests not so much the creation of a voting a base to build upon (which is how BNP members tend to reason away this kind of uninspiring performance), but something of a peak.

The torrid news climate of the past week should have played directly into the BNP's hands. It didn't - and it's gratifying to know that whatever concerns folk might have over immigration, they aren't prepared to be panicked into voting for the odious British National Party.

October 19, 2007

BNP's near-miss in East Midland by-election a warning to anti-fascists

23 Comment (s)
Our local by-election reports have regularly stressed that despite entering into a long period of electoral stagnation, the BNP is still capable of pulling off some nasty surprises, and this week we have to report a very nasty surprise.

The sole by-election contested by the BNP last night was at Church Gresley, Swadlincote, which elects to South Derbyshire District Council. South Derbyshire is currently controlled by the Conservatives, who have a majority of seven over Labour (there is one Independent and no Liberal Democrat representation).

Swadlincote sits squarely within an area of the Midlands noted for delivering high BNP votes, as we discussed in our report on the Charnwood District Council Shepshed by-election and for this reason we must take a particular interest in the Church Gresley contest.

The ward itself, on the south side of Swadlincote, is held by Labour. At the May elections two Labour candidates contested against two Conservatives in a straight fight. The combined voting percentages were a mathematically neat 66.6% Labour, 33.3% Conservative. There was, then, a danger of the intervening BNP candidate feeding off the Labour vote, and that some Conservative voters, knowing that the Tories could not win Church Gresley, might be tempted to switch to the BNP.

Though the BNP has never previously fought Church Gresley, in May the party fielded two candidates for South Derbyshire DC seats. Because he BNP stood single candidates in multiple vacancy wards where the other parties ran two or more candidates, their results are open to interpretation.

Contiguous to Church Gresley is Swadlincote, contested in May by last night's candidate Richard Fallows. The BNP averaged vote came in at 22.7%, placing Fallows fourth ahead of three Conservatives and three Liberal Democrats. In next door Newhall and Stanton, the BNP's Paula Bailey took an averaged vote of 23.4%, and despite coming seventh of seven (three Labour candidates convincingly beat the three Conservatives) obtained the better result of the two BNP candidates.

The closeness of the BNP's May votes and the linear contiguity of Church Gresley with Swadlincote and Newhall and Stanton gives us some idea of the yardstick by which last night's result can be judged. The BNP will have aimed at 23% of the vote or better in a three-cornered (Lab/Con/BNP) contest in a Labour-held ward.

There is, as we must concede, no avoiding the fact that the racist party did very much better than that.

South Derbyshire D.C. Church Gresley ward result:

Lab 639 43.80
Con 304 20.84
BNP 516 35.37



Total 1459

Though the BNP clearly ate substantially into the Conservative vote, it was the Labour vote which suffered most from the BNP's intervention. Had the Liberal Democrats stood to further split the mainstream vote in Church Gresley we could very easily be reporting a BNP gain.

Exactly why the BNP in the East Midlands has been able to buck the trend of its own performances elsewhere is not readily obvious. The wards in which it has been doing well are little different demographically and socially from those in other parts of the country where it has failed to make headway. However that may be, there can be no doubt at all now that anti-fascists and the legitimate political parties have some serious work to do if the BNP is to be prevented from launching an East Midland-led revival.

One good result does not a summer make for the BNP - but we have been warned.

September 27, 2007

Three horse race - but two thirds didn't bet

1 Comment (s)
THE British National Party stood last week for the first time in a Copeland Borough Council election.

By the time of last Thursday night’s count, the campaign had been fought, largely in Whitehaven’s market place, where BNP candidate Bill Pugh had canvassed hard. But seeing the way his party colleagues jostled for position around the counting tables you’d have been forgiven for thinking they were about to go to war again.

Mr Pugh conducted himself quietly, sitting calmly at the back of the room with his wife, and praising his opponents when the result was announced. He was described by one of the other politicians in the room as “a good guy who’d fallen in with the wrong crowd”.

That crowd was out in force, displaying their red, white and blue BNP rosettes. Regional organiser Clive Jefferson scoured the room during the count, occasionally barking orders to the others: “You keep an eye on that!” “Don’t let them away with anything.”

It was clear it was going to be a long night.

Mr Jefferson looked furious at times, watching events all around the room, stopping occasionally to glug from a bottle of Lucozade.

The room had an air of unease about it, which seasoned Conservative councillors Norman and Yvonne Clarkson clearly sensed. They wandered around the room, shaking hands with people from all three parties and generally brightening the mood.

Brigid Whiteside and her husband Chris, the prospective Tory candidate for the next general election, stood quietly at one end of the room while Labour’s Jeanette Williams sat, looking the most nervous of all the candidates.

Even when it was clear she had won comfortably (they divide the votes into batches for each party before they count them and her stack was substantially larger than anyone else’s) she refused to get excited.

Her fellow Harbour ward councillor, Henry Wormstrup, took some of the pressure off her when his mobile phone rang and he was the unfortunate one who was the first in the room to be frowned at by elections officer Alan Southward.

The tension mounted, and under Mr Jefferson’s watchful eye, each of the votes not marked with a clear X was scrutinised and added to the appropriate pile.

Yet two-thirds of the Harbour Ward’s eligible voters did not turn out on polling day.

The BNP is, understandably, the most controversial political party in the country. Its views on race and immigration are, its organisers claim, greatly exaggerated in the media in an attempt to discredit what they stand for.

If you looked past the Union Jacks and BNP slogans, Mr Pugh’s election leaflet read for the most part like an electorate’s dream. He advocated a return to weekly bin rounds, moving away from fortnightly collections; an end to the council’s Executive “squandering tax-payers’ money” on what he regards as extravagances such as the away-days recently revealed by The Whitehaven News.

He was also keen to protect our hospital services and look after elderly residents, as well as providing more affordable social housing.

But there, in the middle of it all, was another pledge, to stand against plans for a large-scale mosque in Whitehaven. The only trouble with their pledge is that there isn’t a mosque planned for Whitehaven, on any scale, large or otherwise.

The BNP delivered a petition to The Whitehaven News before the election, in which they claimed that 1,000 people were against the plans for a mosque. A number of names appear twice or three times and dozens of the signatures were from people from outside the area. Osama Bin Laden was among the signatures.

Back at the count, the returning officer – Copeland’s chief executive Liam Murphy, said that, politics aside, it had been one of the most exciting by-elections in Copeland’s history.

As it turned out the police presence wasn’t necessary, and the expected trouble didn’t occur. Perhaps Copeland’s decision to enforce a rule that exists but which is rarely exercised,which limits the number of supporters who can accompany each candidate at the count, was a wise one.

But for now the voice of democracy has spoken, Harbour’s newest councillor has taken her seat – and the good people of Copeland get back to their day-to-day lives.

Whitehaven News

September 14, 2007

Stalled - no by-election joy for BNP

16 Comment (s)
A crop of local by-elections in the north-west of England and north Wales last night brought no cheer to the British National Party, which voters decisively rejected in four out of the five wards where it stood candidates.

So dire was the BNP's performance that at the time of posting nothing has been published on its main news webpage. Presumably its so-called news team are having problems working out how to spin the bad tidings. While the wait goes on the party faithful have been thrown a bone in the form of a gloating "analysis" of the UKIP's dismal performance on Thursday night. Tucked away on its "Regional Voices" page the article is entitled "UKIP’s week of unremitting woe" and speaks of a "hat-trick of disasters" for the anti-Europe party - epithets which might equally well be applied to the BNP's own showing, which the article (unsurprisingly) manages never to mention!

The only vaguely bright spot for the BNP came in Rossendale Irwell ward, where the party's percentage vote rose slightly over last May's. Irwell was the scene of the BNP's greatest efforts in Rossendale, where it also fought Goodshaw and Whitewell wards. From a base of 26.25% of the vote in May, the vote in Irwell rose to 27.55% - an increase of only 1.3%, giving the racist party third place and disappointing many members who believed the BNP could take the seat or at least come second.

Elsewhere in Rossendale, the BNP scored 7.52% in Goodshaw and 7.29% in Whitewell, where it has not fought previously.

In Liverpool Warbreck ward the party lost ground, having scored 4.72% in May, falling slightly to 4.47% on Thursday. While the BNP will plead that Warbreck is not suitable territory for a party of its type, the fact remains that Warbreck is exactly the kind of ward in which it should be making an impression if its claims to electoral progress are to have any validity. As it is the 146 votes and 4.47% garnered is little different from that obtained by racist parties in Liverpool in the 1970's.

The BNP's attempt to establish itself in Wales saw it contest Conwy Borough Council's Mochdre ward, to very little effect. Out of 663 votes cast the BNP gained a measly 35, or 5.28% of the vote.

While we accept the local factors and local personalities play an important part in local elections, what is abundantly clear from the latest crop of results is that the BNP's electoral stall - readily evident in the May elections - has become part of a fixed trend.

Earlier this month we reported on the Loughton Alderton ward by-election, where the BNP retained the ward by the skin of its teeth but suffered a 5% loss of votes, pointing out that though the party might crow about its "success" a 5% fall-off was a serious matter that could not be avoided or explained away.

The party's propagandists will have a harder time explaining away Thursday's poor performance, in which the only crumb of comfort was a 1.3% increase in a seat where they hoped for more. We have no doubt, however, that Griffin's men will come up with something plausible enough to reassure the BNP faithful in their continuing belief that, somehow or other, only with Nick Griffin at the helm will the BNP make electoral progress - despite the fact that by any standards, what Nick Griffin is presiding over can hardly be called "progress".

Results (percentages in brackets):

Goodshaw (Rossendale)

Lab 632 (59.40)
Con 300 (28.20)
LibDem 52 (4.89)
BNP 80 (7.52)

Total 1064

Whitewell (Rossendale)

Lab 399 (31.97)
Con 152 (12.18)
LibDem 606 (48.56)
BNP 91 (7.29)

Total 1248

Irwell (Rossendale)

Lab 379 (37.16)
Con 312 (30.59)
LibDem 48 (4.71)
BNP 281 (27.55)

Total 1020

Liverpool Warbreck

Lab 1796 (54.99)
Con 40 (1.22)
LibDem 1024 (31.35)
BNP 146 (4.47)
Ind 131 (4.01)
Green 45 (1.38)
LLCP 32 (0.98)
UKIP 52 (1.59)

Total 3266

Conwy Mochdre

Lab 303 (45.70)
Con 159 (23.98)
BNP 35 (5.28)
Plaid 166 (25.04)

Total 663

September 06, 2007

BNP official arrested during campaign

5 Comment (s)
Whitehaven police arrested a BNP official in King Street on Saturday.

The Copeland organiser for the BNP, Clive Jefferson, had been giving out BNP literature to town shoppers as part of the by-election campaign for the Copeland Council Harbour ward poll later this month.

Mr Jefferson was arrested after a member of the public alleged he had been threatening or abusive.

Police press spokesman Ben Meller confirmed to The News that: “A 40-year-old man from Cockermouth was arrested for an alleged Section 4 public order offence. There had been reports the BNP had set up a stall in King Street. We saw copies of the literature and it was not regarded as being of a racist or hate crime nature. However there was a complaint from a member of the public of that he had been threatened or abused by a person at the stall.”

He said the arrested man was released without charge but will have to return to Workington police station to answer bail on September 21.

Mr Jefferson later said: “The complainant was not a passive member of the public, he was aggressive and accused us of being fascists.”

Whitehaven News

June 29, 2007

By-election results for June 28th 2007

0 Comment (s)
Craven ward by-election, Pendle BC

Lib Dem 632
Con 260
Ind 241
BNP 237 (16.4%)
Lab 76

Previous BNP electoral history in this ward:
2004: 447 votes (21.9%)
2006: 459 votes (25.0%)

Slough ward(Nuneaton & Bedworth)

Turnout 40.57%
Labour Gain from Tories

Labour 862
BNP Alwyn Deacon 582 (27.3%)
Tories 499
Eng Dems 102
Lib Dems 83

Charlemont/Grove Vale by-election(Sandwell)

Con 870
Lab 801
BNP 544 (21.6%)
Lib/Dem 238
Greens 71

Whaddon Ward (Milton Keynes) by-election result from last night was

LAB 1108 - 43.8%
CON 914 - 36.1%
EFP 221 - 8.7% England First Party
LIB 129 - 5.1%
UKIP 109 - 4.3%
IND 49 - 1.9%

March 11, 2007

3-0! Three key council by-elections, three BNP defeats

0 Comment (s)
Three key by-elections in successive weeks last month could have provided the BNP with an excellent platform from which to launch its local election campaign for May. However, through hard grassroots campaigning, which included tackling the BNP head-on, the fascists failed to win any of them. This was all the more remarkable given that in one ward the BNP already had two councillors and in another it had previously had a councillor and came within fewer than 30 votes of winning last May. Any political party considering how to deal with the BNP threat in its area could do no better than look at the lessons from these three by-elections.

For several years council by-elections have been tailor-made for the British National Party. The racist party can concentrate its resources, tap into local resentment and a protest vote and catch the main parties napping. Many of its council successes originated from a by-election victory.

Success has dried up in recent times as the political parties have become better prepared to take on the BNP, and anti-fascist groups more sophisticated in their campaigning. In fact the last council by-election the BNP won was in September 2004. Between then and last month there have been scores of contests but the BNP has not even come close.

This looked like changing last month when three by-elections were called in successive weeks, including two in areas where the BNP had already had councillors elected. With the May 2007 local elections only weeks away the stage was set for a major BNP push.

The by-elections were in Bede (Nuneaton and Bedworth), Brunshaw (Burnley) and Illingworth and Mixenden (Calderdale). The BNP divided up its national operation with activists from the Midlands, the South West and even London and Essex concentrating on Bede. The North West focused on Brunshaw and Yorkshire on the Calderdale seat.

In all three wards the BNP set about running model campaigns. Not only would a victory act as a wonderful launching pad for its local election campaign but the elections also provided activists with an opportunity to practise their own campaigning skills.

The BNP had never contested Bede before, but a profile of the ward illustrated its potential clearly. Solidly white and working class, the area had once been the site of a mine, long since closed, and more recently home to many car workers who had also seen their jobs disappear. It bordered Nuneaton with its substantial Asian population and there was a general feeling that Bedworth was losing out. In the 2004 European elections the BNP picked up 9% of the vote across the borough with no local campaigning.

The BNP hit the ground running, delivering several leaflets in the first week of the campaign. Under the stewardship of Wayne McDermott, the party’s East Midlands election officer, and with the guidance of two national officers, Eddy Butler and Sadie Graham, the BNP set about canvassing the entire ward.

The Labour Party was slow to respond. Surprised by the BNP effort, they initially thought that the BNP was best ignored but of course this policy had to change as the fascist threat became apparent.

The unions were mobilised and two sent letters to their members in the ward while others sent activists in to help the Labour campaign.

The local TUC obtained some Searchlight postcards and circulated them around the ward. The following week 26 people, including both Searchlight and UAF activists, distributed two more leaflets and it is clear they had an impact. The week before polling day saw the arrests in Birmingham over an alleged kidnap plot. Given the media hysteria surrounding the raids Searchlight felt it had to deal with the politics of hate head on.

Polling day, 8 February, was hit by atrocious weather but there was still a 36% turnout. Labour won the seat by 112 votes, but the BNP came second with a respectable 31% and more votes than the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats combined.

Analysis of the results by polling district suggested that Labour’s vote held up while a chunk of the Conservative vote slipped away to the BNP. As usual, the BNP also picked up many people who had previously stopped voting.

Speaking after the election the Labour agent told Searchlight that the presence of the BNP had galvanised local members. “In a strange way they actually did us a favour,” he said. “It was certainly the hardest campaign that I’ve ever had to face. We are very grateful to the work of Searchlight.”

Amusingly, the BNP was vitriolic in its rage at Searchlight. Simon Darby, the regional organiser, even told a local journalist that they had lost because of our intervention. While this is overstating the case and ignores the hard fought campaign from the Labour Party, our leaflets certainly did have an impact.

Previously held

A week later on 15 February came the Brunshaw by-election. A traditional Labour seat which the BNP won in 2003, only to lose it after a year when its councillor Maureen Stowe walked out of the party, it was now a three-way marginal. In last May’s elections, where two seats were vacant because of Stowe’s resignation from the council, Labour and the Liberal Democrats took one each, with the BNP only 29 votes behind.

The BNP distributed a total of 12 leaflets during the campaign, including a full-colour postcard and a mail-merge letter to identified supporters. In addition, they canvassed the whole ward, a first for Burnley BNP. Everyone agreed that it was by far the most professional campaign the BNP had ever fought in the North West.

The Liberal Democrats matched the BNP leaflet for leaflet. Their campaign focused on the unpopularity of local planning decisions while simultan-eously squeezing the Labour vote by presenting themselves as the only party that could beat the BNP.

With a week to go, Searchlight’s own telephone poll, coupled with insider information, showed it was neck and neck between the Liberal Democrats and the BNP, with Labour trailing some way behind.

Searchlight produced two leaflets for the campaign, the first focusing on the appalling track record of the BNP councillors in Burnley over the years.

The final few days of the campaign were overshadowed by the trial of Robert Cottage and David Jackson at Manchester Crown Court. Just in case the residents of Brunshaw had not read the papers or watched television, Searchlight produced a hard-hitting leaflet, which was probably equalled in its ferocity only by the Oldham gang rape leaflet in 2002. Headlined “BNP candidate pleads guilty to possession of explosives”, it also drew on a source from within Burnley BNP who told us that Cottage had been to a branch meeting only weeks before his arrest.

The BNP was so furious with our leaflet that its local organiser, David Shapcott, threatened to put a local activist “six feet under”.

On its website the BNP called it “the dirtiest campaign ever” and condemned the Searchlight campaign as “those underhand efforts, and the outrageous interference in the democratic process by Labour’s Stalinist Searchlight allies …”.

The BNP clearly believed that the controversy surrounding the trial was a key factor in its defeat. “This media onslaught clearly roused anti-BNP voters to a frenzy, and produced the wave of tactical voting which saw the Lib Dems take the seat comfortably.”

The Liberal Democrats are less convinced and point instead to localised campaigning on their part coupled with a consistent anti-BNP line coming out throughout the campaign.

The truth is probably somewhere in between. The BNP had identified 1,000 potential voters through its canvassing but despite a large “whipping in” operation only half turned out. Even given the duplicity of people when canvassed, it is clear that several hundred potential BNP voters had changed their mind.

Reflecting on the result, one leading Liberal Democrat in the North West told Searchlight that it was important to carry the anti-BNP message throughout the year and not just at elections. “We are still not getting across an adequate message about the BNP between elections. We have all said we need to mount a policy/ideological/issues attack on them, not just pointing out the failings of their leaders and candidates etc. We are not yet doing it.”

While the BNP was well behind in Brunshaw, there is little room for complacency. With the BNP defending four wards in Burnley in May, and another three at risk, it is clear that the BNP remains a serious threat to all the major parties across the town.

BNP heartland

The Illingworth and Mixenden by-election was always going to be a lot harder. The ward already had two BNP councillors and was one of the party’s safest in the country. The BNP worked it hard, delivering at least nine leaflets, conducting a full canvass and issuing its increasingly standard mail-merge letter, with localised pledges for every street, individually addressed to voters.

The BNP thought it had won by a mile. Even before the polls closed the party’s supporters were taunting the Labour candidate that it was “already in the bag”.

But the BNP had not expected one of the best Labour campaigns to date. Localised campaigning and canvassing were complemented by a strong anti-BNP campaign co-ordinated by Hope not Hate Yorkshire. While the BNP vote held firm from last May, Labour found several hundred new voters.

“It was a model campaign,” said Hope not Hate’s Paul Meszaros. “This proves that there is nowhere in the country where we can’t beat the BNP.”

Searchlight