February 06, 2007

Ku Klux Klan Rebounds With New Focus On Immigration, ADL Reports

0 Comment (s)
The Ku Klux Klan, which just a few years ago seemed static or even moribund compared to other white supremacist movements such as neo-Nazis, experienced "a surprising and troubling resurgence" during the past year due to the successful exploitation of hot-button issues including immigration, gay marriage and urban crime, according to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

The League, which monitors the activities of racist hate groups and reports its findings to law enforcement and policymakers, has documented a noticeable spike in activity by Klan chapters across the country. The KKK believes that the U.S. is "drowning" in a tide of non-white immigration, controlled and orchestrated by Jews, and is vigorously trying to bring this message to Americans concerned or fearful about immigration.

"If any one single issue or trend can be credited with re-energizing the Klan, it is the debate over immigration in America," said Deborah M. Lauter, ADL Civil Rights Director. "Klan groups have witnessed a surprising and troubling resurgence by exploiting fears of an immigration explosion, and the debate over immigration has, in turn, helped to fuel an increase in Klan activity, with new groups sprouting in parts of the country that have not seen much activity."

The full ADL report includes a slide show of recent Klan meetings and rallies and a state-by-state listing of active Klan chapters, or "Klaverns," across the country.

ADL has identified the following states as being notable for active or growing Klan chapters:

SOUTH: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas
MIDWEST: Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Ohio
GREAT PLAINS: Iowa and Nebraska
MID-ATLANTIC: Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and West Virginia

The troubling Klan resurgence has manifested itself in a number of ways:
  • Longstanding groups have increased their activity and experienced a rapid expansion in size.

  • New groups have appeared, causing racial tensions in communities previously untroubled by racial issues. They hold anti-immigration rallies and recruitment drives and distribute racist literature with a new emphasis on the immigration issue, and Hispanics.

  • Klan groups have become more active in parts of the country that had not seen much activity in recent years, including the Great Plains States such as Iowa and Nebraska, and Mid-Atlantic states such as Maryland, Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

  • Klan groups increasingly are cooperating with neo-Nazi groups, especially the Minnesota-based National Socialist Movement.
The Klan has adopted new publicity tricks, such as sending racist fliers to school teachers during Black History Month, and has embraced the Internet as a means to spread anti-Semitism and racism. One group, the Empire Knights of the KKK, runs an Internet-based radio station, dubbed "KKK Radio," which broadcasts white power music and racist and anti-Semitic propaganda.

Reinventing the Klan

"Although some Klansmen may still hold cross-burnings dressed in robes and hoods, today's young Klansmen are more likely to look virtually indistinguishable from racist skinheads or neo-Nazis," said Ms. Lauter. "Today's Klansmen may be as likely to gather at white power music concerts or socialize at so-called 'unity rallies' with other white supremacists, as to participate in ritualistic cross burnings in the rural wilderness."

Since the early 1990s, Klan groups have become increasingly "nazified," with members embracing and immersing themselves in neo-Nazi and racist skinhead subcultures, adopting the music, dress, tattoos and imagery of neo-Nazis, according to ADL. Another trend has been "the collusion and cross-fertilization" of Klan chapters and other major American racist groups.

In March 2006, for example, about 80 members of the National Socialist Movement and various Klan groups met in Laurens, South Carolina, to discuss ways to increase cooperation. Groups on hand for the event included the National Socialist Movement, Aryan Nations, the Griffin Knights of the KKK, the Teutonic Knights of the KKK and the Yahweh Knights of the KKK.

ADL

February 05, 2007

Failed fuel protestor joins the BNP

6 Comment (s)
Nick Griffin, writing in his Chairman's Column, makes much of the fact that farmer and haulier, Andrew Spence, one of the architects of the fuel protests of 2001 and on, has finally made the move from UKIP to the BNP, where he's more or less guaranteed a chance at a seat in the North of England during the next council elections in May.

Spence, who is known for his right-wing views and for being sympathetic to the BNP, was fairly high profile during the protests and ever ready to run off at the mouth about fuel duty charges despite knowing next to nothing about them. Curious really - you'd expect a haulier to know the subject inside-out. Here's part of a farcical interview with Andrew Spence, made at the height of the fuel protests:

PETER ALLAN: Why are you protesting then?

ANDREW SPENCE: Because the government has put the tax up which has pushed prices past £1 a litre.

PA: No they haven't, duty is less than it was the last time you protested.

AS: yes they have, prices have gone up 20p this year.

PA: Thats not the government's fault though, they haven't put the tax up.

AS: We're still paying 67p a litre in tax because they've put it up.

PA: Except that they haven't have they?

AS: Yes they have, Brown's made £10bn in VAT this year!

PA: Thats not the tax though is it.

AS: Look, none of us know how much tax we're paying! He won't tell us. And the prices have gone up 20p a litre because of the tax.

and so on.

Following the fuel protests, Spence went on to join UKIP and stood for them in the Sedgefield constituency against the PM, Tony Blair. According to Griffin, Spence and his protests came close to bringing down the Blair government in 2001. Strange then that when he stood against Blair in the same year, Spence could only manage a pitiful 2.4% of the vote - or 974 votes against the PM's 26,110. After this dismal showing, it was no great surprise that Spence eventually edged his way out of UKIP (after failing to be selected by the party for a Hartlepool by-election in 2004) and slowly moved over to a party that's happy to accept any loser that's going - the BNP. Naturally, Griffin claims that Spence became disillusioned with UKIP's money-grabbing, incompetent, unprincipled leadership - so one wonders why he's moved into another organisation with a money-grabbing, incompetent, unprincipled leadership.

Spence's history during the fuel protests will no doubt be trumpeted by Griffin from the rooftops as the attempt of one man to right all the wrongs of society. Nick Griffin and the BNP are always trying to create heroes out of nothing - witness the endless column inches they've wasted on the thug, Kevin Hughes, currently inside for an attack on an Iraqi asylum-seeker, in an attempt to convince anyone stupid to listen that he's in line for canonisation - but it's well worth remembering that the last of the fuel protests were an abject failure.

In an article sarcastically entitled 'Protest? What protest?', the Mirror pointed out that the last of the fuel protests in September 2005 flopped spectacularly. The report read; 'Britain's fuel demo ran spectacularly out of gas yesterday with barely two dozen protesters nationwide. Andrew Spence, the man behind the People's Fuel Lobby, arrived at dawn with nine men to stand forlornly outside a refinery in Jarrow, South Tyneside. By midday, they had been joined by one man with a placard, five empty buses, 29 traffic cones and five policemen...'

Spectacularly rejected by the people of Sedgefield, rejected by UKIP, rejected by hauliers all over the country - yes, there's really only one place left for Andrew Spence to go - the party that's jam-packed with rejects, Nick Griffin's BNP.

February 04, 2007

Racism 'rampant' in France

0 Comment (s)
More than half of blacks in France say they fall victim to discrimination on a daily basis, according to the results of the first ever survey of French blacks released on Wednesday.

The survey commissioned by a black advocacy group, the Representative Council of Black Associations, and conducted by the TNS-Sofres polling firm estimated that 4% of France's adult population is black, totalling 1.865 million.

Releasing the survey, the council called for more data on French minorities, arguing that the state's refusal to collect information on its citizens' racial background was compounding the problem of racism in France.

A 'diagnosis'

"For a long time, we were told there wasn't a problem, because there weren't any figures," said Patrick Lozes, the president of the council.

"This survey is a diagnosis," said Lozes, a French-educated pharmacist who was born in Benin. "These statistics show what this society does not want to hear or see."

A total of 56% of French blacks said they were victim of racial discrimination in their daily lives and an even higher percentage - 61% - said they had endured at least one incident of discrimination over the past 12 months, according to the survey.

More than a third of respondents said they had been exposed to "disdainful, contemptuous or disrespectful" attitudes and close to one in four said they were insulted or verbally abused.

Presidential campaign

The release of the survey came amid a push by blacks to put racism squarely on the agenda of the campaign for the French presidency ahead of the April and May votes. Lozes cited poll results showing that only 29% of blacks trust politicians and said "political leaders have a long road to follow if they want to reach us".

Right-wing presidential candidate Nicolas Sarkozy, whose lead in public opinion polls has recently been strengthened, has come out in support of some form of affirmative action.

His main rival, Socialist Segolene Royal, has not laid out specific proposals to help minorities, but recently told supporters on a campaign swing through Guadeloupe and Martinique that France should do more to embrace its diversity.

The council wants guaranteed representation of blacks in parliament and government. There are currently no blacks in government and no deputies in the national assembly elected in mainland France.

'Colour-blind' nation

But calls for affirmative action or quotas for minorities have irked many in France who champion the nation's model of a colour-blind nation that emphasises integration. Racism and integration have become front-burner issues following rioting in Paris suburbs in late 2005.

The racism survey was conducted from January 3 to 23 with about 13 000 respondents, 500 of whom had declared themselves black.

News24

February 03, 2007

Revealed: the front organisation set up by BNP members to raise money in the US

23 Comment (s)
[ Just a bit late. We did a story on this back in May 2006: BNP calls for massive funding fraud via third-party donations ]

· Civil Liberty run by key party activists
· Nick Griffin urged Americans to donate


Members of the British National party have set up a front organisation in an attempt to raise money from far right sympathisers in the United States.

An investigation by the Guardian has revealed that the fundraising group Civil Liberty, which claims to be independent of any political party, is run by key BNP activists with all the money donated through its website going to the BNP's regional headquarters in the north-east.

It has raised concerns that the party appears to be attempting to profit from anti-Islamic sentiment in the United States since the attacks of September 11 2001, by presenting itself as being at the forefront of a campaign to save the UK from being "overwhelmed" by Muslims.

Since 2001 it has been illegal for any political party to accept overseas donations of more than £200, and party officials breaking the law face a year's imprisonment or a £5,000 fine. Both Civil Liberty and the BNP deny they are trying to bypass UK election law, insisting they are entirely separate organisations .

However, the Guardian has established a series of links, including an audio tape of the BNP chairman, Nick Griffin, speaking at a US conference organised by a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, in which he calls on sympathisers to support BNP members by giving money to Civil Liberty.

"Please throw money at the BNP, actually don't throw money at the BNP. Quite seriously it's against the law, but you can as my colleague will be telling you tomorrow, throw money at a group called Civil Liberty which helps members of the BNP and that is within the law."

The Guardian also found that:

· Civil Liberty was set up and is run by Kevin Scott, who until September was the BNP's north-east regional organiser.

· Its PO box address is registered to Tyneside BNP at the home of Jonathan Keys, a former party candidate.

· The site's domain name is registered at the home in Stirling of Steve Blake, the BNP's website editor.

· The BNP's head of administration, Kenny Smith, is named on the BNP website as the national treasurer of Civil Liberty and responds to emails sent to CL.


It is not clear how much money Civil Liberty has raised as its accounts are secret, but the American Friends of the British National party was estimated to have raised £80,000 to £100,000 for the BNP between 1998 and 2001 when it folded - money Mr Griffin said made a "significant contribution to the BNP's [2001] general election campaign".

Yesterday the BNP and Civil Liberty strenuously denied the allegations.

"Civil Liberty is completely independent of the party," said BNP spokesman Phil Edwards. "The BNP receives absolutely no money at all from Civil Liberty and any allegation that [money is being diverted] to the BNP in order to circumvent election laws will be met by a libel writ." [We look forward to receiving our letter from the BNP's solicitors - Lancaster UAF]

In a statement posted on its website, Civil Liberty stated: "Civil Liberty has never given, nor will give a single penny to the BNP. To do so would be in breach of electoral legislation which is clear and strict about who can provide funds to a registered political party. All the money received from generous donors at home and abroad goes to persecuted individuals who have nowhere else to turn to, to assist with legal expenses of employment tribunals and other court costs."

Yesterday a spokeswoman for the Electoral Commission, which monitors political funding, said: "It is illegal for political parties to accept donations from overseas. We will look at these allegations."

Civil Liberty regularly advertises in BNP publications and has appealed for funds on the BNP website. Mark Collett, who was last year acquitted with Mr Griffin on charges of inciting racial hatred, is alleged to have handed out Civil Liberty flyers at a far right event in the US. And at the BNP's annual conference in November, senior BNP figures accused the leadership of using Civil Liberty to build a fighting fund they said was not declared to the Electoral Commission or the wider membership.

Mr Edwards said: "Civil Liberty is an organisation which was set up to assist nationalists fight legal cases and employment tribunals and other civil cases ... The fact that it is Kevin Scott [who set up Civil Liberty] ... why shouldn't it be?"

He said that being a member of the BNP did not stop people handing out leaflets. As to the PO box for Civil Liberty being the same as for Tyneside BNP, "A PO box ... is purely and simply a facility. It doesn't mean there are any links - you are clutching at straws," he said.

Lord Dholakia, deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats in the House of Lords, said: "I am concerned that money raised abroad may be used to sustain political activities of the BNP in the UK and there is a clear need to investigate links between the BNP and Civil Liberty." He has written to the Home Office and the Electoral Commission calling for an investigation.

Civil Liberty's website describes the UK "as one of the most repressive regimes in the world". In its "US appeal" section it calls on American sympathisers to hand over money to help the fight against the spread of Islam. "If you know that Islam has waged holy war from Arabia to Lower Manhattan for 1,400 years, aiming at the forcible conversion of the world ... if you remember 9/11, you will understand why this is the crucial issue of our time."

Who's who

Kevin Scott

Founder of Civil Liberty and until September the BNP's north east regional organiser. He has a conviction for assault and using threatening words and behaviour.

Kenny Smith
Civil Liberty's national treasurer and the BNP's administrator. Based in Scotland, Smith helps Scott run Civil Liberty's website. He is also editor of the BNP's internal membership bulletin, British Nationalist.

Jonathan Keys
A BNP activist in the north east. The Civil Liberty website uses a PO Box which is registered to Tyneside BNP at Keys' home.

Steve Blake
Blake is responsible for the BNP website. He is an IT consultant and the Civil Liberty domain name is registered at his home in Stirling.

Guardian

February 02, 2007

Far-right group sidelined in European Parliament

2 Comment (s)
European parliamentarians have ditched normal procedures as a means of freezing out Europe's new extreme right group out of Strasbourg's positions of power.

Members of the European Parliament have united to exclude representatives of the new far-right wing party from key committee posts. However, the recently formed Identity, Tradition and Sovereignty group (ITS) will receive funding after being officially approved as a political bloc.

"They got their cash, but lost any power," a parliamentary spokesman said of ITS.

The right-wing group includes a diverse range of politicians from Romania's xenophobic and anti-Roma Greater Romania party through to France's anti-immigrant National Front and Belgium's Vlaams Belang.

Prominent members include Frenchman Jean-Marie Le Pen and Alessandra Mussolini, granddaughter of Italy's former fascist dictator Benito Mussolini.

Break with normal procedure

Under normal parliamentary procedure, committee positions are distributed according to the size of the parliamentary groups. This would have entitled the far-right wing alliance to two vice-chairmanships.

But parliamentary rules also allow for a vote if one-sixth of committee members request it. On Thursday, lawmakers decided to break with convention and called for secret ballots.

ITS' two nominees for the parliament's culture and transport committees were then voted down. The chairs and vice-chairs for the remaining 20 committees were endorsed without a vote.

The committee chairmanships, which has the power to influence the parliament's agenda, were largely seen as one of the few changes that could have occurred in the parliament's daily politics after the ITS was approved as a political group.

Applying unfair tactics?

"The parliament operated in a legal, but, shall we say, slightly unfair fashion when they demanded votes," according to one parliamentary insider cited by the AFP news agency.

Spanish liberal Ignasi Guardans Cambo, who called for a secret vote in the culture committee along with Austrian socialist Christa Prets said keeping the vice-chairmanships out of ITS hands was important for the EU's image.

"A vice-chairman is our face to the outside," they said. "In the culture committee we cannot have a vice-chairman who works against immigration."

Italian far-right MEP Luca Romangnoli, who had stood for the post of vice-chairman of the transport committee, attacked the way other groups had acted.

"I thought that the European parliament had a high democratic level -- that it was an example for democracy and minority rights," she said. "But it's not like that at all."

The new group, whose leader Bruno Gollnisch is currently awaiting a court verdict on charges of Holocaust denial, is expected to protest, but parliament officials say it is legally powerless to act.

"Cordon sanitaire"

German MEP Martin Schulz, a member of the parliament's socialist group, in mid-January called for other political groups in the parliament to form a "cordon sanitaire" under which the parties would agree not to give extremist parties any important positions.

He also argued that the new faction infringed parliamentary rules because its members did not share a common political platform.

ITS has, however, been approved as political group after an investigation into its legitimacy by the EU parliament's administration. This means that it will receive funding of around 50,000 euros ($65,102) for each member.

ITS was formed on Jan. 9 when it met parliamentary rules requiring formal grouping have a minimum of 20 MEPs from at least six countries. Members of right-wing parties in Bulgaria and Romania, both of which joined the EU at the beginning of 2007, made this possible.

Deutsche Welle

'Racist' claim as turban is forced off

0 Comment (s)
A Brierfield Sikh has made an official complaint to the police after he says he was forced to publicly take off his turban and let down his hair after being arrested.

Newsagent Arpan Singh (21), who was accused of having stolen goods at his shop on Colne Road, claims the custody officer's orders were racist.

As a central part of their religion and as a symbol of spirituality, Sikhs do not cut their hair and wear it on top of their head in a bun covered by a turban. It is mandatory for all adult males. The turban is the outward manifestation of a man's religion and makes the Sikh instantly recognisable.

But on this occasion Mr Singh says he was not wearing the full turban, which is like a long scarf wound around the head, but the "patka", a small covering 30cms square, over the hair and held in place by an elastic band.

The incident happened on Friday, January 19th, at teatime.

After being arrested at his shop, Mr Singh was taken to the custody suite at Burnley Police Station, where, when requested, he took off his shoes, some friendship bands, his necklace and the waist cord from his tracksuit trousers.

He said: "I tried to explain to the officer that it was part of my religion that I did not take off my turban, but he did not want to know and kept talking to other officers. He said that I had no choice but to take it off and feeling intimidated I did so in front of all the other people, who were laughing. He said I also had to take the elastic band out of my hair and let my hair down. I felt humiliated."

Mr Singh, known to everyone as "Johnny", said his 14-year-old brother, Arjun, was also arrested and taken to the same custody cells before him, but he was not made to take off his patka.

"That is why I say the officer dealing with me was racist. This was not a case of religious ignorance. He was also disrespectful and I found it very upsetting. Even Sikhs in police forces throughout the country are allowed to wear their turbans, which bear the badge," said Mr Singh.

He said he asked independent custody visitors at the police station to find out why he had to take his patka off when his brother did not.

He said: "They returned saying it was for health and safety reasons – my health and safety and that my brother also had to take his off."

British-born Mr Singh added: "I have had taunts of 'Sikh b......' hurled at me by other Asians in the town but I did not expect racism from our police."

Police removed cigarettes and SIM cards for mobile phones together with a bicycle he bought at a car boot sale at Colne Sports Centre in October. So far he has not been charged with any criminal offence, was granted police bail, and has to report back to the police later this month.

He said: "I am an honest person."

He added: "I was also arrested in June last year relating to another incident and I was later cleared. I wonder who is feeding the police this information."

He has made formal complaints to the Acting Chief Constable of Lancashire, Steve Finnigan, to Chief Superintendant Jerry Graham, head of the police in Pennine Division, and has written to the Independent Police Complaints Commission. A police spokesman confirmed that Mr Graham had received his letter and the matter was being investigated.

Pendle Today

The Jewish school where half the pupils are Muslim

0 Comment (s)
King David, in Birmingham, is a state primary where the children learn Hebrew, recite Jewish prayers, eat kosher food and wave Israeli flags. So how come the majority of pupils are followers of Islam?

It's infant prize day at King David School, a state primary in Moseley, Birmingham. The children sit cross-legged on the floor, their parents fiddling with their video cameras. The head, Steve Langford, is wearing a Sesame Street tie.

A typical end-of-term school event, then. But at King David there's a twist that gives it a claim to be one of the most extraordinary schools in the country: King David is a strictly Jewish school. Judaism is the only religion taught. There's a synagogue on site. The children learn modern Hebrew - Ivrit - the language of Israel. And they celebrate Israeli independence day.

But half the 247 pupils at the 40-year-old local authority-supported school are Muslim, and apparently the Muslim parents go through all sorts of hoops, including moving into the school's catchment area, to get their children into King David to learn Hebrew, wave Israeli flags on independence day and hang out with the people some would have us believe that they hate more than anyone in the world.

The Muslim parents, mostly devout and many of the women wearing the hijab, say they love the ethos of the school, and even the kosher school lunches, which are suitable because halal and kosher dietary rules are virtually identical. The school is also respectful to Islam, setting aside a prayer room for the children and supplying Muslim teachers during Ramadan. At Eid, the Muslim children are wished Eid Mubarak in assembly, and all year round, if they wish, can wear a kufi (hat). Amazingly, dozens of the Muslim children choose instead to wear the Jewish kipah.

At the prize morning Carol Cooper, the RE teacher, says: "Boker tov," (Ivrit for "Good morning").

"Good morning Mrs Cooper," the children chant in reply. The entire school, Muslims, Jews, plus the handful of Christians and Sikhs then say the Shema, the holiest Jewish prayer, all together.

The Year Four violin club (five Muslims, two Jews) play "Little Bird, I Have Heard". Just as many prizes are being distributed to Hussains and Hassans and Shabinas as there are to Sauls and Rebeccas and Ruths. In fact, if anything, the Muslim children have beaten the Jewish ones. Thus does the Elsie Davis Prize for Progress go to a beaming little lad called Walid, the religious studies prize to a boy called Imran wearing a kipah and the progress prizes for Hebrew, to a boy called Habib and a girl called Alia.

Times being as they are, King David doesn't advertise its presence in a city where its pioneering multiculturalism could raise all kinds of unwelcome attention. There's a discreet signboard outside that reveals little about the school's unique nature. There are watchful video cameras high up on the walls, plus two electronic gates to pass through. Sadly, it is, to a significant extent, says Laurence Sharman, the (Christian) chairman of the PTA, "an undercover school".

The Muslim parents, however, are only too keen to talk in the playground about what might be seen by some in their communities as a controversial schooling decision.

"We actually bought a flat in the catchment area for the children to come here," says Nahid Shafiq, the mother of Zainah, four, and Hamza, nine, and wife of Mohammed, a taxi driver. "We were attracted by the high moral values of the school, and that's what we wanted our kids to have. None of us has any problem with it being a Jewish school. Why on earth should we? Our similarities as religions and cultures are far greater and more important than our differences. It's not even an issue.

"At the mosque, occasionally, people ask why we send the children here, but there is no antagonism whatsoever, and neither is there from anyone in our family. In fact, it was a big family decision to try and get them into King David. This is the real world. This is the way real people do things in the real world. All the violence and prejudice and problems - that's not real, that's just what you see on the news."

Fawzia Ismail (the mother of Aly-Raza, nine, and Aliah, six) is equally positive. "My nephew came here and my brother showed me the school, so it's a bit of a family tradition now. We're very, very pleased with the school. It's so friendly. All the kids mix and go to one another's parties and are in and out of each other's houses. They teach a bit about Israel, but we don't have any problem with that. There are such similarities between our people and our societies."

Irum Rashid (mother of Hanan, nine, and Maryam, four) says that a lot of people in Small Heath are considering moving to Moseley because of King David. "It's a very happy school, the behaviour is fantastic, the food is great - because it's kosher - and so are the SATs results."

But what about learning Hebrew and the Jewish prayers? "I think it's great. The more knowledge, the more understanding," says one of the mothers. "They learn all they need about Islam at mosque school. Actually, the kids often sing Hebrew songs in the bath, which is a bit confusing because we speak Gujarati at home, but I think it's great."

The Jewish parents and teachers I speak to are just as enthusiastic. "You know, in these difficult times in the world, I think we show how things should be done. It's really a bit of a beacon," says one teacher, whose three children all went to King David and ended up at Oxford University.

Parent Trevor Aremband is from South Africa. "In Johannesburg, we have Jewish schools, but they're 100 per cent Jewish, so we were a bit shocked when we first came here. But the integration works so well. It's clearly the way to go in today's world. My son is eight and has loads of Muslim friends."

The most important thing, I am told repeatedly, is that the cross-cultural friendships forged at King David last a lifetime. I hear a conversation about how a Rebecca is going to fly over from the States for a Fatima's wedding. I am told about a pair of lads, one Jewish, one Muslim, who became friends the day they started in the nursery, went to senior school together as well as to university and are now living close to one another with their wives and families and are currently on holiday together.

King David was not designed to be such a beacon of inter-faith cooperation and friendship. Founded in 1865 as The Hebrew School, it was 100 per cent Jewish until the late 1950s.

Then two things began to happen: there was a growth in the Muslim population in middle-income areas such as Moseley, and a shrinking of Britain's Jewish community, especially outside the main centres of London and Manchester. Muslim children started coming to the school in the early 1960s, but the current position, in which they are in the majority (Jewish children comprise 35 per cent, Muslims 50 per cent, Christians, Sikhs and other, 15 per cent) is very new.

"One of the things that surprises people about this school," says Langford, "is that it's not an especially privileged intake. Half of our kids have English as an additional language. But the amazing thing is how well it all works. We have a new little boy here from China, whose only English a few weeks ago was to ask for the toilet. He now speaks English - and can say the Shema perfectly.

"If you gauge success, for instance, by racial incidents, which schools always have to report to the LEA, we have at the most one a term. And that can just mean some harsh words with a racial slant used in the playground. At multicultural inner city schools where I've taught, there will be far, far more than that, possibly one or more a week."

In terms of SATs and Ofsted inspections, King David has also shone. It is rated as good - the second highest possible ranking - in all areas, and Ofsted made a special mention at the last inspection of the integration between children of different faiths and races. In the recent SATs results, the school also came in well above the national average in all subjects.

Steve Langford, a Warwick University economics graduate, is himself a bit of a paradox. He is Church of England on both parental sides and only became interested in Judaism when he worked in a Jewish summer camp in Massachusetts in his gap year. His interest paid off when he got a teaching job a King David. Now he is learning Ivrit at evening classes and goes to Israel for holidays.

The Rabbi of Birmingham's Singers Hill Synagogue, one of the financial backers of King David, is proud of Steve Langford and of the school's extraordinary interfaith record.

"King David School is amazing," says Rabbi Tann. "The reason I think it works well is that racism is engendered entirely by adults. Children don't have it within themselves. Their natural mode is to play happily with everyone. It's only when adults say, 'Don't play with him, he's black, or don't have anything to do with him, he's Muslim, that troubles begin.'

"We never have any racial or inter-faith problems at all. Not ever. In 20 years here, it's simply never happened in any significant way. We teach that if you don't like someone, you avoid them. Don't play with them. Go to the other side of the playground. I believe that if more people followed the lead of King David School, we'd have a much more peaceful world."

Independent

Austria's right threatened by infighting

0 Comment (s)
Infighting along representatives of Austria's right are threatening to tear the right-wing parties apart.

Heinz-Christian Strache, leader of the rightist Freedom Party (FP), is now trying to reassure the public that he "has never been and never will be a neo-Nazi" after photos of him wearing combat fatigues and using a gesture known as a neo-Nazi greeting were leaked to the Austrian media. Rumour has it that the photos were leaked by a rival party faction. The internal strife is a far cry from the right's heyday in Austria after the general elections in 1999 when the FP was a force to be reckoned with.

Led by firebrand populist Joerg Haider the party received 26.9 per cent of the vote and entered into a centre-right coalition with the conservative People's Party.

Now, the movement is split and engaged in an ideological struggle. The Freedom Party is still going strong, receiving 11 per cent in the October 2006 elections, but it's a far cry from past success. The Alliance for Austria's Future (BZ), which split from the FP in 2002, barely made it into parliament.

What went wrong for the right? The FP, a classic protest party, came under the tremendous strain of suddenly having to take the responsibility for government policies, which was strongly resented by the party's extreme right wing, a strong faction since the FP's foundation.

Haider left the FP and formed the BZ which took over as junior partner in the coalition. Since then the two groups have been bitter enemies as they are vying for the same potential voters, creating a unique situation in Austria, said political analyst Peter Filzmaier.

"They are fishing for the same voters," he says.

The political right in Austria faces three major problems: the positioning of the party, ideology and personal animosities.

"The right has to reposition itself, as the traditional old Nazis are literally dying out," Filzmaier says.

Within the FP, party leader Heinz-Christian Strache, a blue-eyed Haider clone, continued the party's xenophobe policies, catering to the disillusioned losers of globalization. While this pragmatic populist approach brought moderate success at the polls, it alienated the extreme right faction, leading to ideological infighting.

Personal animosities coming to the fore after being glossed over in the years of success added to the dilemma, Filzmaier said.

The power struggle between Strache and Ewald Stadler, a senior party member known for his extreme rightist ideology, took up the party's energies in the past weeks. Rumours that the photos were leaked by BZ "moles" turned soon into speculation over a revenge act by the Stadler-camp or neo-Nazis dissatisfied with party policies.

According to the conservative newspaper Die Presse, the FP had been blackmailed with photos connecting Strache with known Neo-Nazis for some time.

Where these developments will lead the Austrian right remains yet to be seen.

"The Austrian right defies all analysis," Filzmaier says, as behaviour patterns predicted by political scientists do not seem to apply.

He estimates the potential for a party catering just to the extreme right is between 4 and 5 per cent of the votes, just enough for parliament.

Playfuls

War pushes UK anti-semitism to record high

0 Comment (s)
Attacks on Jews in the UK rose to record levels last year, peaking during the Israel-Lebanon conflict over summer, a new report revealed today.

There were 594 anti-semitic incidents in Britain in 2006, up 31% from 2005, according to the Jewish community's defence organisation, the Community Security Trust (CST). The report notes that last year's increase was "largely a consequence" of the conflict in Lebanon, with more than a fifth of the incidents taking place during the 34-day war in July and August.

This is the highest level since the CST began collating anti-semitic incidents in 1984, and 12% more than the previous record in 2004.

The total included 112 violent assaults (up 37% on 2005), 70 attacks on Jewish property (up 46%), 365 incidents of abusive behaviour (up 34%) and 27 threats (up 8%). Jewish schools or schoolchildren were targeted in 59 of the incidents, and Jewish cemeteries were desecrated nine times.

The CST, which aims to ensure the security of Britain's Jewish community, also recorded 20 cases of mass-produced anti-semitic literature, down 26% from the previous year. It said the figures continued the trend since 2000 of high numbers of attacks occurring in association with events in the UK and abroad.

The CST spokesman, Mark Gardner, said: "Anti-semitic hate crime levels have doubled in the last 10 years. This is unacceptable racism that many Jews had hoped and believed was a thing of the past. Today's anti-semitism is a wave of hatred, intimidation and abuse against British Jews, who are stupidly blamed and randomly attacked over international tensions for which they bear no responsibility."

He added: "We call upon the police, government, political parties and democrats everywhere to act loudly and clearly against this hateful trend."

Guardian

February 01, 2007

BNP scab union set to launch

4 Comment (s)
The British National Party is set to formally launch its scab union on the 24 February at an undisclosed venue in central London. It is the latest attempt by the BNP to attract working class voters away from Labour. ‘Solidarity, The British Workers Union’ was registered with the certification in December 2005 but it has yet to hold a formal public event. This will change this month when it holds its first Annual Meeting.

Solidarity claims that it will be a normal trade union defending the interests of any British worker, but in reality it will be simply a front for the BNP. Given the BNP’s views on trade unionism and industrial relations, Solidarity will be little more than a scab union.

According to documents lodged with the Certification Office, which regulates matters concerning trade unions, Solidarity aims to “improve the relations between employers and employees throughout all industries served by the union”.

The BNP has been at pains to pretend that Solidarity is an “independent” union, not linked to any political party. It even installed former National Front leader, Patrick Harrington, who now runs Third Way, as its President. It even wrote a letter to the Communication Workers Union denouncing an article in its union journal claiming that Solidarity was a scab fascist union.

“We are not as a 'front' group for anyone,” the scab union wrote in it letter. “Solidarity calls for the unity of all workers on a progressive platform.”

The BNP has attempted to hide its involvement in Solidarity. The documents submitted to the certification office made no mention of the BNP, however it did state its intention to set up a Political Fund and “print, publish, issue and circulate” literature that “may seem conducive to the … objects of Solidarity”.

But let there be no mistake about it, this is a BNP front. The President of Solidarity is Patrick Harrington but the project is coordinated by Clive Potter, a long-time BNP activist from Leicester, who was expelled from Unison for improper conduct. The Solidarity address traces back to Potter’s home. Other BNP activists involved in the project include Jay Lee, who was recently booted out of Aslef, and John Walker, the BNP’s national treasurer, who has had his own troubles with the T&G.

The establishment of Solidarity appears to be a natural continuation of the party’s turn to working-class politics which began in 2000 and quickened over the past two years. The second edition of the Solidarity bulletin focuses extensively on the issue of migrant workers.

Solidarity is unlikely to ever take off. To operate formally as a union it needs to agreements with employers and a proven record of activity, neither of which it is likely to achieve.

Searchlight will post any more details of the Solidarity AGM at Stop the BNP

Far right forms new group in European Parliament

0 Comment (s)
Oh the irony of it all! Fascist parties across Europe including the British National Party had vehemently opposed the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union on 1 January 2007.

But the arrival of five Romanian rightwing MEPs and one Bulgarian has given the far right the opportunity that it has sought since July 2004 to form an official group in the European Parliament, which requires at least 19 MEPs from five countries.

A common political charter was signed on 9 January and the Identity, Tradition, Sovereignty (ITS) group made its parliamentary debut on 15 January. The formation of a formal caucus entitles the group to up to €1 million (£660,000) of central funding, though of even greater impetus was the fact that only multinational groups have any real opportunity to set the agenda, table amendments to legislation and get speaking time in debates. The new group will also be entitled to two posts as deputy president of parliamentary commissions, although as Searchlight went to press MEPs from the Socialist Group and others were threatening to vote against any candidates that the ITS nominates.

The programme of this self-styled “union of patriots” includes a tough anti-immigration platform aimed at “reversing the migration flows”, and opposition to further EU enlargement and to a “unitary, bureaucratic, European superstate”.

Its leader is the French MEP Bruno Gollnisch, number two in Jean-Marie Le Pen’s Front National. Gollnisch, a professor of law and Japanese at Lyon University, is currently awaiting trial on charges of denying the Holocaust. The group includes six other FN MEPs including Le Pen himself and his daughter Marine Le Pen.

The general secretary of the ITS is Andreas Mölzer, a senior figure in Jörg Haider’s Freedom Party (FPÖ) in Austria. Mölzer was elected an MEP in June 2004 and briefly expelled from his party during an acrimonious dispute with its leadership. Ironically Austria was one of the states that fiercely opposed the accession of Romania to the EU. Alessandra Mussolini (Lista Mussolini), granddaughter of Il Duce, is one of two Italian MEPs who have also joined ITS.

In the absence of any BNP MEPs, Ashley Mote, the former UK Independence Party MEP (South East) who was booted out of the party after he failed to reveal he was being investigated over allegations of housing benefit fraud, upholds the British end of the affair. In June 2005 the European Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market waived his parliamentary immunity. Mote currently sits in Brussels as an independent. He was recently forced to deny rumours that he had joined the BNP, stating on his website that he has “no intention” of doing so.

The Bulgarian MEP, Dimitar Stoyanov, belongs to the Ataka party which campaigns for a “mono-ethnic” Bulgaria, viciously assailing the country’s Roma and Turkish population. Stoyanov recently dis-tinguished himself by sending an email to every MEP attacking Livia Jaroka, a Hungarian MEP of Roma origin and the winner of MEP of the year. Stoyanov’s email stated that his own country had the “prettiest Gypsies” and informed anyone who was interested that he knew where you could buy 12-year-old Gypsy brides for “up to €5,000” (£3,300).

Curiously the Sofia Morning News recently reported that Stoyanov, stepson of Volen Siderov, the fervently antisemitic and racist leader of Ataka, has secretly converted to Islam after falling in love. One can only imagine the reaction of his stepfather let alone of the virulently anti-Islam MEPs who comprise the ITS. Not that Stoyanov has suddenly become a convert to the cause of anti-racism. As he told The Daily Telegraph recently, “There are a lot of powerful Jews, with a lot of money, who are paying the media to form the social awareness of the people … They are also playing with economic crises in countries like Bulgaria and getting rich. These are the concrete realities.” These ideas are echoed in the antisemitic ravings published by his stepfather who came a surprising second in the October 2006 presidential election with 21.5% of the vote.

The record of the Partidul România Mare (Greater Romania Party) is little better. Led by Corneliu Vadim Tudor, the PRM is also antisemitic as well as making frequent outbursts against ethnic Hungarians within Romania’s borders. In a bid to gain electoral respectability in 2004 Tudor issued a letter of “repentance” and even hired an Israeli PR firm, Arad Communications, to run his election campaign, ironically the same firm hired by Yad Vashem, the Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes’ Remembrance Authority in Jerusalem. Arad Communications later quit claiming that the PRM was indeed an antisemitic party.

The Latvian far right and the virulently antisemitic and homophobic League of Polish Families have stayed away or perhaps are waiting to see how the ITS develops. The Italian separatist Lega Nord is apparently boycotting the group because of personal differences between its leader Uberto Bossi and Jörg Haider, former leader of the FPÖ.

The idea behind the ITS has been germinating since 2004. A loose ideological confederation designed to give the far right a stronger voice within the European Parliament, the ITS is not necessarily a stable coalition. Mote and Frank Vanhecke, leader of the Vlaams Belang (VB), whose former party Vlaams Blok was banned by a Belgian court for being racist, were quick to distance themselves from Gollnisch’s trial for Holocaust denial but are clearly not horrified enough to desist from involvement with the ITS.

It will be hard to marshal the group to vote for a common agenda. Its east European members are likely to have markedly different national interests from its western MEPs. There is also a sense that the formation of the ITS is a stunt designed to show its members’ respective electorates that they are not an isolated fringe as their domestic records would suggest but part of a wider conglomerate of shared prejudices and hatreds.

We’ve been here before

This is not the first time that the far right in Europe has orchestrated itself into a group. Le Pen led the Group of the European Right from 1984 until 1989 when it imploded acrimoniously following the arrival of members of the German Republicans party who upset the Italian fascist MSI MEPs by questioning the group’s position on the South Tyrol question, long a matter of dispute between German and Austrian fascists and their Italian neighbours.

From 1989 the FN presided over the Technical Group of the European Right, but it ceased when the 1994 European elections left too few far-right MEPs to constitute a group.

The BNP and the ITS

The BNP website heralded the foundation of the ITS, though without MEPs it is not eligible to join. This does not mean it does not want to, despite its opposition to the EU. The BNP is positively chomping at the bit to get elected to the European Parliament in 2009, desperate to get a slice of the action not to mention the funding and other resources available to MEPs.

To this end Nick Griffin, the party leader, has been laying the foundation of future collaboration, cultivating friendly informal links with the leaders of a number of far-right organisations, especially the FN and VB. Griffin had high hopes in the June 2004 European elections that BNP MEPs would soon be sitting alongside their continental counterparts, only to be bitterly disappointed when he was trumped by the UKIP. That defeat certainly explains the libellous vitriol Griffin heaps upon them – he recently accused UKIP MEPs of whiling away the hours with “champagne binges in European brothels”.

As Searchlight reported last month Griffin recently shared a platform with the antisemitic former Klansman David Duke at the far-right Euro-Rus conference in Belgium, before Duke went on to speak at the Iranian Holocaust denial conference in Iran. Afterwards a number of VB participants in the conference took Griffin to a VB post-election victory celebration in a nearby leisure centre. The VB, which now polls around 25% of the Flemish vote, increased its number of local councillors from 439 to 794 in the elections last October. It is a pattern of success that Griffin clearly hopes to emulate.

Searchlight

BNP lying to publicans to book Greenham meetings

3 Comment (s)
Blue Ball landlord said group did not reveal they were political party when they booked a meeting

The pub which hosted the British National Party meeting that caused a political storm has been revealed. Around 30 BNP supporters attended the meeting which led to the shock announcement that the controversial party plans to field two candidates in this May’s district council elections.

The BNP had refused to reveal the name of the venue where the meeting took place on January 22. But we can reveal the event took place at Greenham’s Blue Ball pub.

Licensee Ronnie Allen said yesterday: “The meeting happened here. I was approached by a group wanting to hire the function room. They didn’t say they were a political party. Personally, I have no time for racism. As far as I’m concerned, my pub welcomes anyone, regardless of creed or colour as long as they behave themselves and don’t break the law.”

Mr Allen revealed the BNP had asked him to host a second meeting. He added: “If, as they claim, they are a legitimate political party with nothing to hide then fine. But I’ll want to attend the meeting myself to see exactly what is being said on my premises. If there’s nothing wrong then they won’t object, will they?”

Newbury Today