Some readers of this blog will know that I was a member of the British National Party from its formation until the late 1990s, and that before then I had been a member of the National Front.
Eventually I came to renounce my racist and fascist opinions and joined the fight to expose and combat latter day Nazism, especially that of the BNP.
One thing was de rigueur in the British National Party during my time, and that was a flat denial that the Nazi extermination of six million Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals and others ever took place.
Why?
Because the BNP, like other organisations worldwide calling themselves "nationalist", were so closely associated with Nazism (and rightly so) in the public mind that it was necessary to "cleanse" the history of Nazi Germany.
The largest piece of dirt to scrub away was the Holocaust, and the BNP set to work trying to convince the public that this most horrific of events had never happened.
One leading denier of the Holocaust was the BNP's current leader, Nick Griffin.
In 1998, before becoming BNP leader, Griffin wrote:
"I am well aware that the orthodox opinion is that 6 million Jews were gassed and cremated or turned into lampshades. Orthodox opinion also once held that the earth is flat... I have reached the conclusion that the 'extermination' tale is a mixture of Allied wartime propaganda, extremely profitable lie, and latter day witch-hysteria."For your benefit, here's Griffin denying the Holocaust
again in a 1997 "Cook Report"
4 comments:
ISTR that quote was wrapped up in crap about the BNP's Jewish members, but when I looked again it was gone.
How many Jews are in the BNP 3? 4?
I agree Holocaust denial just became an embarrassment, that's the only reason it was dropped. It was a laugh watching BNP councillors explain it. But all the main deniers are still in the BNP.
There hasn't been a damascene conversion. Griffin just smelled the money.
The BNp's mask has slipped a lot.
Good article.
"Further to elevate just one of the many atrocities Man has inflicted on Man is in itself discriminatory and racist. Emphasis on the lessons to be learned from the horrors of the 1940s concentrates one peoples’ suffering and implies that only Europeans can be guilty of such atrocities. "
No it doesn't. I'm sure Nick Griffin would be the first one to promote Eurocentric history lessons focussing on European history, European achievements rather than focusing on Ancient China, ancient Egypt, the Mayans , The Hindu Civilisations etc. If that is the case if you focus on Europe's achievement you have to teach her moments of shame too. If it is racist to focus on genocide in Europe then it is also racist to only teach European historical achievement.
Further to that the Holocaust is focussed on because admirers of the people who carried that out are around. I'm sure if followers of Pol Pot were around canvassing people would object to them to. In that part of the world there would a a focus on teaching the Cambodian genocide to make sure it doesn't happen again there. Unfortunately if anything the prevalence of genocides around the world does show that humans worldwide have far more in common then people think.
When I was at school we were taught more about the Black Hole of Calcutta, than we were about Auschwitz. Would the BNP prefer that approach????? British victims???
Post a Comment