January 11, 2008

Ibstock and Heather by-election: alarm bells still ringing in East Midlands

Badly in need of an electoral lift to rally the troops at a time of bitter internal division, the Griffinite BNP has descended en masse to the unassuming Leicestershire villages of Ibstock and Heather, where an otherwise unremarkable local by-election is being fought on Rebel BNP turf.

It's been a long time since the BNP poured resources on the scale it has into a by-election, and the clear intention is to take full advantage of the groundwork done by those now in the rebel camp to produce a stunning result for which the Griffin faction will take full credit.

Ibstock and Heather is a ward of North-west Leicestershire District Council, and squarely in a triangle of the East Midlands which - as we have been noting for some time - has been producing some of the best BNP election results in the country, in large part due to the organisational abilities of the expelled Sadie Graham.

Though we don't know what part the local rebel BNP has played in the election, it seems that the Griffinite BNP has taken it out of their hands, loyalists from as far afield as Newcastle being roped in to help. What candidate Ivan Hammonds makes of it all and where his sympathies lie is anybody's guess.

Ibstock is a large-ish former mining village, while Heather once enjoyed the close-by delights of an open-cast coal-mine. Both were also concerned with brick-making, of which industry the Ibstock Brick Company is a notable survivor.

The disappearance of the mines has seen steady demographic change in the district, North-west Leicestershire producing one of the most extraordinary results of the May 2007 local elections, when Labour were swept aside in a tidal wave of Conservative gains.

With 21 councillors and a majority of 4, Labour lost 16 seats, while the Conservatives, starting with 12, gained 15 for a majority of 16. While the Liberal Democrats remained unchanged on 3, others lost 1, with one remaining - and the BNP gained 2.

Thursday's by-election was called following the death of the sole sitting Labour councillor.

Ibstock and Heather is a multiple-member ward, voting as follows in May:

Con 737/731/599
Lab 707/620/559
UKIP 411
LibDem 225/222

The UKIP is not fighting this by-election, stoking BNP expectations of cleaning up their vote in a four-cornered Con/Lab/LibDem/BNP fight.

The BNP has for some time resisted the temptation to publicise its expectations, almost certainly because it so rarely meets them. Martin Wingfield is decidedly guarded, preferring to quote campaign manager Wayne McDermott's positive assessment and a Vote-2007 forum poster who predicted a 15-20% BNP vote. Wingfield is left to bemoan the fact that he has been refused membership of the Vote-2007 site, which might have something to do with the fact that the administrators of Vote-2007 have no intention of opening themselves up to the attentions of the BNP's keyboard army (and the fact that a little bird warned them...).

We would find it very difficult to believe that the BNP's minimum expecation can be anything less than 20%, and in all probability, given the resources they have expended, 25%. Nor would we, given the BNP's first-time performances in this area, be completely surprised if the BNP were to achieve the higher figure.

NW Leicestershire DC Ibstock and Heather ward result (percentages in brackets):

Con 515 (22.47)
Lab 699 (30.50)
L-D 441 (19.24)
BNP 637 (27.79)

Total 2292

Turnout 40.37%.

While the Labour vote (though down) has held up remarkably well, it is all too clear that the BNP has swallowed up the UKIP vote and persuaded a good proportion of Conservative voters into their camp.

We have to admit that this is a poor result for anti-fascism, especially as the Liberal Democrats (who did increase their vote) delivered anti-BNP literature to most households.

The questions now begin: what will this result pressage for the BNP's internal divisions? Nothing is more certain than that the Griffin camp will shout it to the heavens and gleefully highlight the lack of direct involvement by Sadie Graham and her supporters (even if that isn't quite true). And perhaps the Graham camp will hit back by highlighting the Griffinite BNP's hijacking of the campaign. To most BNP members, though, the result will be seen as a near-miss on new ground, and thus a success.

For us, a very loud alarm bell continues to ring in the East Midlands, but - the BNP did not win, and I am now reliably informed by a local correspondant that in the later stages of the campaign they became increasingly confident that they would (though they were careful not to say as much). And they must improve upon or at least defend their vote when Ibstock and Heather is next fought to give substance to their repeated claims of electoral progress, something the BNP has so far signally failed to do.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

A good, fair report Denise that doesn't try to hide the truth. Griffin must be doing handstands that this fell into his lap.

Anonymous said...

If the press, local and national, would pick up on all the chaos in the BNP at the moment, all the resignations and accusations, their percentages would be cut in half at least.

Anonymous said...

Another great (and honest) report Denise, thank you.

Anonymous said...

As the Duke of Wellington said : "a damned close-run thing".

A very worrying result, and a wake-up call for us all, but the fact remains that the BNP hasn't won a by-election since ...... er, can anybody remind me when it was ??? But, it was a long time ago.

The BNP had a lot going for it here:

1. NW Leics in the E Mids, where things have been going well for a while (by their standards)
2. a big UKIP vote; and no UKIP candidate this time
3. the BNP nationally desperate and bussing in activists from Cumbria !!! Newcastle !!!

Even the Green Wheelbarrow almost got off his a**e to go and help - he says all he needed was a sofa (to sit on and play with his laptop presumably).

"Good second places" have their value, but winning is everything - and the BNP hasn't done it for a loooooong time.

Anonymous said...

Is that iliacus who sometimes writes for LUAF? When are you going to write something else? I enjoyed your stuff.

Anonymous said...

According to newspaper reports the total number of people who voted in the Ibstock and Heather by-election was 3,267.

The total number of votes for the to 4 parties was 2,292.

3,269 - 2,292 is 975.

So, where did the other 975 votes go?

If they went to other parties not listed then I would like to see those figures.

If they were spoiled ballot papers then that could be quite interesting. If they were spoiled on purpose (which we probably won't be able to find out) then that would mean several things, including that around 900 people didn't feel that any of the parties, including the BNP were worth their vote!

Either that or the figure of 3,297 is incorrect. I'm having trouble finding a reliable source.

Can anyone help?

Anonymous said...

The Griffin crew ARE shouting about the result all over the place and using it to attack Sadie G etc, Nick won this etc, but they muscled in because they knew a good result would come here. Griffo wouldn't have moved in if it was somewhere they get 5%. He'd have blamed that on Sadie and co.

Good report, closer to the truth than the crap the BNP are coming out with.

Anonymous said...

The first figure is wrong Joe, There were only 2292 legal votes and 3 or 4 spoiled papers.

Turnout was 40%

Anonymous said...

old nick -
many thanks for your kind remarks. Tis me indeed; working on another little article as we speak (as it were).

joe chapman -
I make the total number of votes cast to be 2,262; I suspect the local newspaper report of 3,267 is a typo for 2,267, which would indicate 5 spoilt papers which is within the range one would expect.

One further point - this was one of those 4-cornered fights with not a huge margin from 1st to 4th. In such cases a relatively low percentage can look better than it really is.

Let's not forget that 70%+ of those who voted DIDN'T want the BNP. And the turnout was scarcely thrilling.

Anonymous said...

Oops, sorry - whilst not "thrilling" the turnout - at just over 40% - was actually a pretty decent figure for a by-election.

The proportion of the electorate who voted BNP was 11.2% which is one of their better results - but it still only amounts to one voter in nine.

Anonymous said...

"The first figure is wrong Joe, There were only 2292 legal votes and 3 or 4 spoiled papers.

Turnout was 40%" - Anonymous

Thanks.

Bloody Journalists! I wonder where they got the figure from?

Are you able to tell me where you got your information from?

Unknown said...

Bloody Journalists! I wonder where they got the figure from?

Trust DG, Joe. I'll never let you down.

Anonymous said...

Ah! Sorry Denise.

That was a bit of an insensitive comment to make regarding journalists. I think the job you and others are doing here is brilliant, good, fair journalism.

Anonymous said...

Yes I can Joe, I was there and as for the remark about 70% not wanting the BNP, the same can be said for the other parties so what a stupid statement ( not by you I might add)

Anonymous said...

28 % of the vote,its getting higher. next stop dicky barnbrook for london mayor ? denise you should start the card game higher or lower

Anonymous said...

Dear anon: (could you please use a name of some sort; it would make life easier)

Of course it's true that - using my logic - 82% didn't want the Lib Dems, or 70% didn't want Labour. But that wasn't the point I was making.

Labour, the Lib Dems and the Conservatives have certain things in common:
a) they are not constitutionally racist;
b) they do not exhibit fascistic principles e.g. adoption of the fuhrerprinzip;
c) they tend to take a dim view of holacaust-deniers, violent criminals, and the religiously intolerant (who seem to thrive in the BNP).

So the point I was making was that 70%+ of the people who voted chose a non-fascistic party. Simple as that.

Appreciate you BNP-loving trolls must be getting tired of your party's failure to win by-elections, but don't try to take it out on iliacus !!

Anonymous said...

I wouldn't worry about the trolls hyping up the chances of the bnp winning yet more parish council elections so they can discuss dog poo and faulty church bells as a platform for their "final conflict".

According to the "alias smith and sadie" weblog, the BNP strategy officers are too busy downloading "horse porn" to win parliamentary seats. Yes, folks, we did say "horse porn!" Horse as in fucking Shergar (literally)......

http://alassmithandgraham.blogspot.com/search/label/Perversion

"Jockeys, please mount!!!"