They read here that their grasp of employment jargon is so fleeting that they couldn't actually grasp what “Pro Rata” means (Def: “In Proportion” or “Proportionately”) and had claimed that a 10 hour a week job paying £19,500 pounds per annum (Def: “for a year”) pro rata worked out at the princely sum (Def: “the whole amount, quantity or number”) of £37.50 per hour (Def: “for an hour”).
So. Being brave and honest and ever ready to admit a mistake and make good, they duly amended (Def: “changed”) the story.
And got it wrong again.
They're now claiming that the 10-hour job pays £19.500 per year. (Screen Shot below.)
Idiots (Def: “BNP News Team”).
7 comments:
Why don’t the media latch onto just how idiotic this tiny bunch of irrelevant cluster-fucks actually are?
Well, because they are a tiny bunch of irrelevant cluster-fucks and the media would be more interested in reporting about cats stuck up trees or the risk of snow.
The BNP were once a threat. Now they are absolutely nothing; any talk of them being a future threat makes about as much sense as my three year old son secretly plotting to invade Poland.
Prod and poke them for fun by all means, but please just treat gri££in’s tiny scum-cult with utter contempt.
Are trhe BNP accounting Division doubling up as the 'news team'?
I wonder if they are on bugger all per hour, pro rata paying cyclops for the privilege?
(Hello HFTF..... missed any more curve balls today?)
BNP Candidate in Barnsley attacks Labour war hero over the sad loss of his wife...
http://enisdalton.blogspot.com/2011/02/emotional-blackmail-by-labours.html
@peter parker
Really? That true? Better keep an eye on your little boy if that's the case.
@ Kev Scott loves The Jam - please don't wind that fucker up here!!!
The BNP share the same brain cells with the EDL.
Both are thick as pig poo!
Sorry first class.... couldnt resist...
Post a Comment