October 27, 2007

Is the BNP's Lee Barnes losing the plot?

Before you read on, you need to know that there's an awful lot of swearing in this article. Not from us but from Lee Barnes, the British National Party's legal beagle who seems, at the very least, to have severe anger-management issues.

Barnes' blog, entitled '21st Century British Nationalism', is illustrated with an image of the Celtic god of light, Belenus. Belenus can be identified with the Irish god Bile, and the word bile pretty much sums up a large part of the content of Barnes' blog, which seems to be one of the many vehicles the BNP is currently using to disseminate its impotent fury at well, pretty much everyone and everything really.

A recent post on the blog deals with the closure of the New Nationalist Party (NNP), the group formed around a nucleus of angry BNP ex-pats which decided to give up the ghost a couple of weeks back. This group was led by former would-be BNP councillor Sharon Ebanks who, if you feel you really need to, can be read about here.

Although Barnes isn't actually a member of the BNP, he certainly has taken to using the terminology currently in vogue on the far-right, describing the NNP variously as uniform fetishists, saps and muppets. His major burst of vitriol though, is reserved largely for Ebanks herself, who he calls a 'demented harridan' and who he takes to task several times for her apparent crime (and he should know, or so he says) of being mixed race.

'It is one of the great ironies of history that the last gasp of the old extremist far right was under the leadership of a half black female leader.'

That statement might not actually be racist but it certainly reads like it.

A few days later, he had a go at Pete Doherty of Babyshambles, drugs and Kate Moss fame. Doherty comes in for a lot of flak from the far-right because he's into drugs in a big way and looks like shit but mostly because he's outspoken on the subject of the far-right and is prepared to put his money (and his band) where his mouth is. Because of this, Lee Barnes says;

'Pete Doherty - Junkie scumbag piece of shit worshipped by scumbag UAF fuckwits and NME wankers.'

Barnes talks of nationalism as if he is simply a nationalist but it's clear that, like most of his comrades in the BNP, he is far from that. He is a racist, pure and simple. As a racist, his response to the news that the geneticist James Watson had been universally attacked by more or less the entire media for his views that black people are less intelligent than whites was entirely to be expected;

'The mewling maggot filth of the media that condition and brainwash the masses ensure that the rule of the stupids is ensured. When a man with a mind, a free thinking and visionary mind, dares reveal the stupidity of the stupids then all the stupids come together to destroy him...They are howling and barking and pissing on his footprints...Not one of the media maggots that attacked James Watson, nor the idiotic so called 'scientists' they managed to scrape up from the shallow end of the scientific brain pool to attack him, dared confront him in a free and fair public debate...Instead they all just howled when he left the country and continue pissing on his prints in the mud. What a complete bunch of gutless bastards.'

Not quite the language one would expect from the legal representative of a so-called political party, particularly if one considers that if, by some bizarre and terrible fluke, the BNP suddenly became the governing party, he would be either the Lord Chancellor, Attorney General or the Justice Secretary.

But Sharon Ebanks, Pete Doherty and the media pale into insignificance beside Barnes' hatred for, curiously, the judiciary.

We can all quote numerous cases of judges who appear to have become stuck in the 19th Century or those whose sentences are both ludicrous and insulting to the victims of crime but there is always another stage to go to - the Appeal Court, the High Court, the House of Lords and so on - and our legal system, including the judiciary, is rightly regarded as one of the best in the world - or was until the right to trial by jury was abolished for many types of case. I'm no great advocate for the law but if I was to be tried for a crime anywhere, I would rather be tried here in the UK. Mistakes are made but justice - in a very general sense - is fairly well-served. Though if you listen to Lee Barnes, you may well think again.

Injustice rightly makes us angry. Severe and blatant injustice can leave us seething with anger and, if the government of the day is watching the media, which generally follows the lead given to it by the public, can lead to changes in the law which we hope will eventually benefit all of us, not just those who have directly suffered. But even when dealing with a case of outrageous injustice, the government, in the form of its Ministers and other representatives, speaks of such things in measured tones, keeping emotion firmly to one side as it deals with whatever the problem may be in a dignified and resolute manner. Compare that to Barnes' views on some of the judiciary;

'Yet again the dumb fucking Leftist and Liberal judges that infest the legal system like lice on a dying dogs back, have let a piece of shit free...This judge is the same cunt that gave the Wonderland paedophile gang sentences that equated to 15 months in prison...this cunt needs sacking...The fucking judges put Kevin Hughes away for 2 years because he had a scuffle with an asylum seeker that led to the asylum seekers shirt being ripped...This cunt blinds an old man and he walks free - yet we all know the real reason dont we. Yep, hes from an ethnic minority.'

What Barnes deliberately forgets to mention is that the victim was from an ethnic minority too. And the reason that the attacker wasn't jailed? Because, in the words of the judge;

'[Jailing him] would do nothing to protect the public in the future and my real concern is the public. It seems to me that the best way of ensuring that he is not a risk, is in relying on various support from psychiatrists and probation officers.'

The attacker, a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic, was sentenced to a three year supervision order which requires him to receive psychiatric treatment. A jail term would serve simply to punish the man: at least this way, he both suffers a form of punishment and receives proper supervision and treatment.

Justice is a very tricky game but it is worst served by those who put emotion before sense, a failing that suits the knee-jerk populist policies of the self-serving BNP.

One wonders about Barnes' legal training and education. Though they appear to have been enough to make him the BNP's legal whizkid, they don't seem to have been of a high enough quality to help him spell 'apointee' or 'farsical'. They do however, allow his inherent racism to show itself on any available occasion.

In an attack on sentences that he deems too lenient, it's notable that Barnes makes his appeal on emotional grounds in the first instance, using paedophile-sentencing to illustrate his perhaps fair point that sexual crimes against children should almost automatically receive the highest sentence that can be given under the law. The point is lost though by the long list of exclusively illegal immigrants, asylum-seekers and just people with non-English names who are listed for all sorts of crimes simply because they are not white and thus are natural targets for BNP ire. Any selection of criminals, whether it is based on the nature of the crime, the apparent low sentence or even the age of the accused, will show the larger proportion are white - Lee Barnes' idiosyncratic selection has proven that his legal eye has a definite list away from justice for any kind of ethnic minority, which perhaps explains why he's not actually a practising solicitor or barrister.

Normally I'd make allowances for someone who regularly sees UFOs (honest), ignoring them in much the same as I would those who regularly communicate with their spirit guide, but in Barnes' case I'll make an exception. For a man who is meant to represent the BNP's views on legal matters, in my opinion he comes across as a racist thug - no different from the shaven-headed loons who used to march with Nick Griffin in the National Front, except that he has hair.

44 comments:

Anonymous said...

Come on Ketlan, you called D a Dyke. not very PC.

Sami said...

"severe anger-management issues"

You sound like a major liberal Ketlan. Good article tho.

Anonymous said...

"Not quite the language one would expect from the legal representative of a so-called political party, particularly if one considers that if, by some bizarre and terrible fluke, the BNP suddenly became the governing party, he would be either the Lord Chancellor, Attorney General or the Justice Secretary."

LOL I felt this horrible shudder go up my spine then. If your going to write stuff like that, give us a warning first.

Mr Fister said...

In his picture, Barnes reminds me of that hypnotistm from Little Britian.

It's one of the reasons I never look into his eyes.

Anonymous said...

Lee Barnes is not losing the plot, he lost the plot years ago. He is a vile lying bully and pseudo intellectual psychopathic freak who worships Rudolph Hess.

I was treated to enough bullying at the hands of Mr Barnes to last anyone a life time, it ceased when I threatened to chop off his balls and hang them from a pawn brokers sign in Birmingham City centre.

Mr Barnes harbours many fetishes, one of which is to be driven in a long black limousine through the streets when the BNP takes power so that he may wag his finger at those deserving a bullet whilst his henchmen oblige.

Those of you viewing who may be Barnes sycophants and as yet not realising that most of what he writes is plagiarised from journalists and sundry authors, stated in an email that ORDINARY BNP members were never to have Civil Liberty monies spent on them. So, the ORDINARY BNP member who leaflets and canvasses unlike the lazy slob Mr Barnes, had better watch out and ensure they never donate to Civil Liberty.

Regards

Sharon Ebanks

Anonymous said...

Here, the viewers may as well see just how mad he is, besides, you get more BNP watchers than UAF.

Regards

SE


"Kenny,

you willstick to doing the accounting, Kev will stick to doing the management , steve will stick to running the website and I will run the campaigns of CL and fight the legal cases.

Seeing as Civil Libery will be relying ON MY expertise in law and civil rights procedure, i dont need lessons from you or anyone on what i should be doing or how i should be running the campaigns.

I dont like being told by anyone what I should be doing and how to do my job - nor do you. Therefore take note , you do your job and i will do mine.

I and Kev will decide what issues CL will run with - not anyone else.

CL is an organisation set up to defend NATIONALISTS and NATIONALIST principles - the last thing this country needs is another civil rights organisation that represents left wing / populist causes or any other vague issues. The only group in this country that does not have specific representaion as per their rights are nationalists and thats why I set up civil liberty as part of that strategic goal. This is a specialised group with limited resources, limited staff, limited skills and limited funds.

The remit of Civil Libery is dictated by me in communication with Kevin as I will be doing the majority of legal work.

Just as i will not interefe with you doing your job in CL , then butt out from interfering in my job of running the camapigns of CL.

If you think CLs role is to raise funds for campaigns then you have NO idea of the role of CL - a single campaign such as the penalty charges campaign would cost about
£ 200,000 to get it into the House of Lords and then there are costs implications as well.

Civil Liberty has a role but to pretend its to bank roll legal cases for the party , or anyone , is simply pie in the sky and demonstrates a woeful lack of insight into the way the British legal system works.

CL is not a funding pot for people to take cases on as it will NEVER have the money to do that - for just one example the Arthur Redfearn case has so far cost arthur about forty- forty five grand so far and will cost him another ten to twenty when it goes to the court of appeal and then if it goes to the house of lords it will cost another fifty to hundred grand with costs implications of the level of 2-250 grand for arthur on top of that.

Therefore CL cannot, by the nature of the costs involved, ever pretend it can take on such cases - and therefore your entire statement is predicated on a total lack of knowledge of the true situation fo the reality of such an organisation as CL.

As for the expenses / accounts issue - i will work with you and kev on this issue kas , but please dont ever wave your dick in my face and tell me how to run CL , this is not your organisation to tell anyone what to do with it.

I run the campaigns side, plan the strategy and run the cases whilst you control the finances and kev controls the management and operation of the CL itself. Do not think that you have any operational input as per how CL is run or what we should be doing - you stick with what i know you are good at, and i will do what i am good at.

What campaigns i decide CL will run is my and kevs joint decision only.

The money raised from CL will not be going into a black hole to support legal cases for BNP activists - it will assist them when it can but the remit of CL extends beyond just throwing money down drains for no good reason.

The strategic role of CL is a lot more complex that you know kas , so i suggest that you call me before you decide to start telling me what you think CL should be doing in future.

As for the accounts issue, if you think that by controlling the purse strings you can tell me what to do and how to run the operations of CL then think again.

If you have a problem with the fact that I have joint authority with kev on what camapigns we run and what happens with the money then youd better ring me and we can discuss it.

And never the twain shall meet.

If you have a problem with any of what i have written then call me on 07766224926 and we can talk about it on the phone.

Lee"

Anonymous said...

Nick Griffin recently described Lee Barnes's blog as “an intensely argued, intellectually inventive thing”. If that's what Griffin thinks is intellectual, well it says it all really.

Anonymous said...

More Barnes insanity for you from a BNP article


"As with all universally applicable political theories, geostrategies and geostrategists are primarily Bio-Regionalist by reference and their policies are relevant principally to the national context in which they were analysed and devised: this being the nationality and natural environment of the geostrategist themselves, the strength, nature and quantity of the country’s natural resources, projections of future trends in relation to population numbers, social dynamics and national economics, external factors affecting the national interest both short term and long term, the scope and philosophies of their country's goals and social and political aspirations, recognition of the time periods involved in planning and sustaining an evolutionary society, and the technological factors that affect the energy capacities, military, economic, and cultural engagements, ancestral heritage requirements and future impacts of technological developments upon that society."



This one is my all time favourite. Barnes discussing the dishwasher. I don't think I've ever met a better candidate for largactyl.

Regards

SE



"It is a genocidal monster. It represents our national shame and an era of
decadence and environmental rape, plunder and murder. It is symbolic of
the
insidious advance of Corporate Fascism that has crept into every home and
life. It
and its ilk are the legions of satan.

When you use it you bow before it to fill its gaping maw with plates and
cups,
like a worshipper before some ancient pagan god. You caress its shiny
steel carapace and admire its sleek lines, then return to it day after day
with fresh
offerings and prayers.

You use it to distance yourself from the simple mechanics of food
preparation and
cleaning - and in so doing seperate yourself from the natural world. You
no longer
kill your food and prepare it, and thereby have lost contact and reverence
for
nature and life. You see the meat before you in plastic packets and do not
see the
web of life from earth, water to sun that gave life to the creatures you
eat and
how you, and all you love , are part of that sacred web of life. You see
yourself
as seperate, instead of part of nature. You are in a cocoon of illusions
seperate
from life.

That vile machine sucks up electric generated by oil that is being used
to fund
terrorists that kill our people and troops. It and its metallic kin are
the signs
of what the poet William Blake called ' Ulro' the Death Age - this is the
era of
the Kali Yuga in Hindu thought and the lead Age in Greek thought"

webeatthebnp said...

so where does one find this ludicrous blog?

Antifascist said...

'worships Rudolph Hess'

Evidence?

'Mr Barnes harbours many fetishes, one of which is to be driven in a long black limousine through the streets when the BNP takes power so that he may wag his finger at those deserving a bullet whilst his henchmen oblige.'

He might write crap but I'm not sure I believe that at all.

'so where does one find this ludicrous blog?'

Oh alright. It's here http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

Here is what the South Birmingham Organiser, Mike Bell, had to say about Barnes's bleat on dishwashers


"Originally Posted by superwhitearmy
For the first time ever i am going to risk swearing Lee Barnes is a fucking prick.If he dares spoil my party any further god help him and me!"


I doubt many would disagree, Mike.

Regards

SE

Anonymous said...

"Antifascist said...
'worships Rudolph Hess'

Evidence?"


Stormfront-Username: Vidar



"'Mr Barnes harbours many fetishes, one of which is to be driven in a long black limousine through the streets when the BNP takes power so that he may wag his finger at those deserving a bullet whilst his henchmen oblige.'

He might write crap but I'm not sure I believe that at all."


I can assure you it's true.

Regards

SE

Jackson said...

To sharon Ebanks

Isn't it time you started your own blog to attack the BNP rather than posting here?

Anonymous said...

"Jackson said...
To sharon Ebanks

Isn't it time you started your own blog to attack the BNP rather than posting here?

10:49 PM, October 26, 2007"


I haven't made that many posts on here and anyway, it matters not where you post, the BNP is finished and Griffin knows it.

Regards

SE

Anonymous said...

Perhaps Lee Barnes is angry because you had his Wikipedia page deleted.

Anonymous said...

" Jackson said...

To sharon Ebanks

Isn't it time you started your own blog to attack the BNP rather than posting here?

10:49 PM, October 26, 2007"

Another thing: my "blog" was the NNP until it failed. I guess no-one wants to hear what I have to say.

Regards

SE

Anonymous said...

Great article guys

Anonymous said...

Why does Sharon Ebanks, former Griffin sycophant and unter-fuhrer of Birmingham, lately leader of her own neo-Nazi grouplet, the NNP, constantly tours the internet to spit her hate-filled venom against Lee Barnes? Is it because he is a visionary and a political theorist who sees through the deadend politics of people like Ebanks?

Anyone who thinks Ebanks has any good within her soul when she spouts her hate against Barnes should read Barne's trologyn on his own blog which cuts through the nonsense and deception of people like Ebanks.

Written and published almost prophetically just prior to the collapse of the neo-Nazi NNP and the resignation of its ethnically diverse leader, of the most important British nationalist articles has appeared on the Lee Barnes blog site;

http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/

In some ways it is a synthesis of the existing thinking of Lee Barnes, one of Britain’s seemingly maverick and prophetic ideologicians to appear within the last decade. The article, ‘The Enemy Within’ is a wake-up call for British nationalists.

In an age of the most gravest and insidious threats to our racial homeland from mass immigration and the growth of Eurabia, our home grown nationalists have shown to be too busy shuffling the deckchairs around on the deck of the Titanic, oblivious to the sinking ship and indeed blind to the iceberg that that caused it in the first place.

Whilst our people drown on the lower decks caused by mass immigration and Islamification, and our Government and Establishment ignore their plight or prepare themselves for escape on the few lifeboats available, our nationalist leaders fight on the decks obsessed that the sinking is due to Zionist sabotage.

Such is the mindset of these little nationalists who inhabit a world of Zionist shadows, whilst the real enemies of Britain stand apparent in front of us.

Barne’s three-part article smashes the self-deception of these deadbeat nationalists from yesteryear, predicated on a return to foreign ideologies and the sub-cult of the skinhead.

The articles are almost a cry of desperation at the wasted years, when nationalists could have built a strong foundation upon which to build a future renaissance. Instead, short-term goals by narrow-minded leadership took the nationalist movement from a bang to a whimper within a decade, thus bringing us closer to the demographic edge where any realistic chance of saving the ethnic integrity of the people of the British Isles ends. “Their chatter is the soundtrack of our civilisation as it collapses from within” is such a powerful poetic statement, yet one that must resonate within every nationalist soul.

But constructive criticism is important as Barnes recognises as without that life force the body politic will stagnate and fossilise. Though how such constructive criticism manifests within the ambit of the current BNP leadership with its expulsions, resignations, threats and over-centralisation I do not know and I think that this matter has not been clearly addressed by Barnes in his article.

But the difference between legitimate criticism and the excesses of blind posturings by pseudo-nationalist groups are “essential mechanisms in order to sabotage our social growth and political development.

The BNP is the sole legitimate and viable vehicle to carry our nationalist aspirations to victory. Anything less must be considered a fantasy. Lies peddled on the internet and to the media are essentially acts of sabotage that must resisted so as to allow the nationalist machine to lead its way unobstructed to its historic mission of leading our people away from slavery to victory.

There simply is no more time to build another nationalist party like the BNP. Barnes exposes the fantasies of those who think otherwise, these toy-town Nazis and empire builders who strut their egos on the political stage are part of the problem, not the solution.

Europe, the world even, are – through a convergence of catastrophes – on a brink of a golden day of opportunity. Through chaos there is a window of chance that a political and social movement properly and prepared can take advantage of.

” We shall go down into history either as the architects of our national rebirth...or we shall be remembered as the last of the great British indigenous political resistance movements”.

Ebanks - take note of your ludricous rantings against those who have the intellect and vision to see a real future for nationalism in this country.

Anonymous said...

Another thing: my "blog" was the NNP until it failed. I guess no-one wants to hear what I have to say.

Regards

SE


Fucking right no-one wants to hear your sreeching, now shut up and fuck off you Odin-worshipping nazi nut.

Anonymous said...

"Anonymous said...
Why does Sharon Ebanks, former Griffin sycophant and unter-fuhrer of Birmingham, lately leader of her own neo-Nazi grouplet, the NNP, constantly tours the internet to spit her hate-filled venom against Lee Barnes? Is it because he is a visionary and a political theorist who sees through the deadend politics of people like Ebanks?

Anyone who thinks Ebanks has any good within her soul when she spouts her hate against Barnes should read Barne's trologyn on his own blog which cuts through the nonsense and deception of people like Ebanks.

Written and published almost prophetically just prior to the collapse of the neo-Nazi NNP and the resignation of its ethnically diverse leader, of the most important British nationalist articles has appeared on the Lee Barnes blog site;

http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/

In some ways it is a synthesis of the existing thinking of Lee Barnes, one of Britain’s seemingly maverick and prophetic ideologicians to appear within the last decade. The article, ‘The Enemy Within’ is a wake-up call for British nationalists.

In an age of the most gravest and insidious threats to our racial homeland from mass immigration and the growth of Eurabia, our home grown nationalists have shown to be too busy shuffling the deckchairs around on the deck of the Titanic, oblivious to the sinking ship and indeed blind to the iceberg that that caused it in the first place.

Whilst our people drown on the lower decks caused by mass immigration and Islamification, and our Government and Establishment ignore their plight or prepare themselves for escape on the few lifeboats available, our nationalist leaders fight on the decks obsessed that the sinking is due to Zionist sabotage.

Such is the mindset of these little nationalists who inhabit a world of Zionist shadows, whilst the real enemies of Britain stand apparent in front of us.

Barne’s three-part article smashes the self-deception of these deadbeat nationalists from yesteryear, predicated on a return to foreign ideologies and the sub-cult of the skinhead.

The articles are almost a cry of desperation at the wasted years, when nationalists could have built a strong foundation upon which to build a future renaissance. Instead, short-term goals by narrow-minded leadership took the nationalist movement from a bang to a whimper within a decade, thus bringing us closer to the demographic edge where any realistic chance of saving the ethnic integrity of the people of the British Isles ends. “Their chatter is the soundtrack of our civilisation as it collapses from within” is such a powerful poetic statement, yet one that must resonate within every nationalist soul.

But constructive criticism is important as Barnes recognises as without that life force the body politic will stagnate and fossilise. Though how such constructive criticism manifests within the ambit of the current BNP leadership with its expulsions, resignations, threats and over-centralisation I do not know and I think that this matter has not been clearly addressed by Barnes in his article.

But the difference between legitimate criticism and the excesses of blind posturings by pseudo-nationalist groups are “essential mechanisms in order to sabotage our social growth and political development.

The BNP is the sole legitimate and viable vehicle to carry our nationalist aspirations to victory. Anything less must be considered a fantasy. Lies peddled on the internet and to the media are essentially acts of sabotage that must resisted so as to allow the nationalist machine to lead its way unobstructed to its historic mission of leading our people away from slavery to victory.

There simply is no more time to build another nationalist party like the BNP. Barnes exposes the fantasies of those who think otherwise, these toy-town Nazis and empire builders who strut their egos on the political stage are part of the problem, not the solution.

Europe, the world even, are – through a convergence of catastrophes – on a brink of a golden day of opportunity. Through chaos there is a window of chance that a political and social movement properly and prepared can take advantage of.

” We shall go down into history either as the architects of our national rebirth...or we shall be remembered as the last of the great British indigenous political resistance movements”.

Ebanks - take note of your ludricous rantings against those who have the intellect and vision to see a real future for nationalism in this country.

12:02 PM, October 27, 2007"





Hello Lee, you brain-dead dickhead. I've never been a national socialist and I have never worn a uniform. YOU MUST TRY HARDER but don't forget to take your medication first.

Denise G said...

Lee Barnes is the proprietor of an overweening ego, his narcissism perfected to such an extraordinary degree that we wonder how it comes to be that he does not make himself pregnant.

His ego and his narcissism being so extravagant, and the compulsive necessity to sate them occupying and otherwise exercising so many more brain cells than the normal, non-pathological human being feels inclined to alot to the task, his intelligence has been neglected in inverse proportion, to the point that it is barely detectable.

It is an integral and highly noticeable facet in the psychology of failures that they must compensate for what is to them an inexplicable lack of achievement by the invention and maintenance of a facade of success.

Unfortunately, any person not afflicted by the dullest of wits at once finds his or her eyes piercing through the transparency of the facade, to observe the snivelling ugliness beyond.

This being the case, the talentless egotist is driven to find an audience unquestioningly appreciative of his sorely limited talents, one that will pay him out in the adulation he believes to be his due. Thus such creatures naturally gravitate towards the claustrophobic world of the religious cult and the conspiracy-obsessed extremist political party, the natural constituency of which is the psychologically damaged and the intellectually restricted - the steady prey down the ages of con-artists sporting a wafer-thin patina of wholly bogus intelligence.

The ego and accompanying narcissim is massaged in these tiny worlds by those the sufferer considers to be his inferior, but it is never more than a temporary salve, for the sufferer cannot get himself to believe that he is any less than he thinks he is, and swells with resentment that outside his insular circle he is regarded as little more than an untalented whelp, worthy of nought but the deepest contempt.

Thus it is that the sufferer is impelled to take the argument in favour of his own perceived greatness to those who remain implacably unimpressed. He cannot help himself, for the twin curses of his ego and his narcissim tell him that he is by far the most clever fellow he knowns, and as such easily capable of getting one over on the lesser minds which have - unfathomably - neglected to fawn before the majesty of his cod-intellect.

On the internet he feels this to be a simple affair. He will go about dressed with another identity (or indeed, identities), lauding himself in the third person in so extravagant a manner that it is readily obvious that it is the words of the narcissist we are reading, and not those of some distressed acolyte. His self-justifying arrogance will never allow him to acknowledge that his tactic if of the tried and failed variety, and he will attempt it again and again - his intellectual limitiations oblige him to.

And so I give you Lee John Barnes and his contribution to this debate - but I might well be addressing myself to Patrick Harrington or any number of others who, for having taken their own supporters for fools, beleive they can work the same trick on the world at large.

Anonymous said...

"Another thing: my "blog" was the NNP until it failed. I guess no-one wants to hear what I have to say.

Regards

SE"

The first decent thing you've said in a long time. Go back into retirement, you aren't no good for the nationalist cause.

Anonymous said...

Denise, I have never read a better put down in all my life. Expressive, eloquent, and to the point.

I'm glad it's our side you're on, not theirs.

Anonymous said...

Barnes is nothing more than an egotistical mouthpiece.
Ask the idiot why he banned everyone from the BNP forum (when he wasn't even a member anyway), and then they were all reinstated!!
wahoooo...."do as I say you morons.....or else" that was his cry. Where did it get him?
Bloody nowhere at all.
He's just a sad old wannabe, who think's he might be, but we know he won't be!!
Waffle on dear chap, you just might find someone in the Labour back-benches (who has just woken up) and will listen to you for a second or two!
NO ONE ELSE WILL, OR WANT'S TO!

Regards. Mr Fister.

Anonymous said...

Many of us in the BNP agree with that DG. We're not all morons. Bad news for you though DG is that you sounded like John Tyndall at his best. Are you by any chance related?

webeatthebnp said...

Love the phrase "Legal Beagle" - though a tad unkind to beagles!

Just what are the legal qualifications and achievements of Mr Barnes?

I know he places some letters after his name, but rather like Mr Griffin's BA (Cantab) it doesn't necessarily mean a lot!

After all, I was once given Special Branch screening, but that doesn't make me James Bond !

Rah said...

Denise, I have never read a better put down in all my life. Expressive, eloquent, and to the point.

I'm glad it's our side you're on, not theirs

Hear hear!!!

Mary said...

I can't believe that Lee larnes has bothered to post his own paranoid conspiracy theory anti-Semitic nonsense on this blog, mentioning the old-frashioned neo-Nazi Zionist conspiracy.

(posted) 12:02 PM, October 27, 2007

The Lancaster UAF BLog should delete this bullshit neo-nazi post, as the point of this blog isn't to promote anti-semitism.

Anonymous said...

"Anonymous said...
"Another thing: my "blog" was the NNP until it failed. I guess no-one wants to hear what I have to say.

Regards

SE"

The first decent thing you've said in a long time. Go back into retirement, you aren't no good for the nationalist cause.

8:05 PM, October 27, 2007"


Hate to disapoint you but I didn't write the above.

Regards

SE

john p said...

Hello Sharon, still using the same old excuse that somebody has hacked your account.
That got very tired a long time ago.
Lay off the Ritalin love, seriously.
It gives you delusions of power and they are delusions. You have no power, you are nothing but a joke really and you should just fade away.
Go on, off you go, whatever purpose you served earlier has now gone. Nobody likes you, you don't have one redeeming feature and you are just another brummy chav living off benefits.
I hope one day you will be able to take a long look at yourself and see yourself the way the rest of us see you.
An embittered nobody who holds a grudge against those in power and is unable to do anything about it. You lash out randomly at people and try to give the impression that you know more that you actually do, you are fooling no one.

Anonymous said...

johnp said....a long hard look...while i agree with johns sentiments, they were a bit harsh, SE must be feeling very lonely out there now, and lets face it the only place she appears to post nowdays is here.

All that aside to take a look at herself would need a big mirror.

Anonymous said...

Individuals like Ebanks merely reprsent the bitter dried up dung heaps of yesteryear. They lost the intellectual and political arguments against others who discarded their long-dead neo-Nazi ideology a long time ago.

Lee Barnes represents at least some of the newer, radical and refreshing thinking of today on the nationalist scene. Much of it is an amalgram of left and right, and not a rehash of tired, outdated thinking.

As regards his legal qualifications he has a law degree from the University of Kent and in one of the years he was there his class won the Times Award for Excellence.

Whatever you like to say about the man he is qualified and a remarkable legal man who gets the respect of many opposing him in the court rooms.

Denise G said...

Barnes, this is the LUAF blog, not the home page of the Lee Barnes Self-Admiration Society - and it's not going to be.

You've had more than a fair run, in your usual dishonest way, more than I would have allowed you.

Now take a hike and massage your vanity elsewhere.

Anonymous said...

anon said....in one of the years Lee Barnes was at uni? he won the Times award for excellence.

What in making Fairy Cakes?

dinosaur senior said...

Barnes is so boring on the page - the total apparent lack of any sense of humour, the edifices of abuse..

But to be fair, the guy isn't so bad in person, speaking so rapidly you barely notice whether he's talking crap or not.

On the page, however, he is Joseph Goebells - and you cannot read him. You just cannot read him.

Anonymous said...

denise and sharon are both paranoid...Lee is away at the moment hes not posting ANYWHERE,
GET A GRIP EBANKS YOU SOUND DEMENTED

Anonymous said...

EBANKS IS A LIAR OVER AND OVER

Anonymous said...

DENISE g what makes you think lee is posting on this shit site... i have news for you he's not i know where he is and it aint reading this

Anonymous said...

"Lee is away at the moment hes not posting ANYWHERE,"

"DENISE g what makes you think lee is posting on this shit site... i have news for you he's not i know where he is and it aint reading this"

You make it sound like he is spending some time at Her Majesty's pleasure!

Anonymous said...

Shazza Ebanks, the resident neo-Nazi commentator on this forum seems to have emerged from the pages of mythology.

In her former guise in the BNP she tried to appear as a "beautiful maiden" (well, after one became thoroughly inebriated I suppose she could possibly through beer goggles), enticing and seducing BNP membners and officials, even the fuhrer, Griffin, himself. She even tried to charm her way into Lee Barnes! But now Shazza has emerged as the counter-shadow, the old hag, her true self, to enact revenge against the Grail Seekers of True Nationalism.

This excerpt details more about KHUNDRY, the mysterious mythological figure which is Shazza Ebanks:

"In Wagner's last music-drama Parsifal, we encounter a mysterious creature called Kundry. In the domain of the Grail, this Kundry appears as a wild woman, an unkempt, shabby and repulsive crone. On the other side of the mountains, however, in the magic garden of the sorcerer Klingsor, she appears as a beautiful maiden."

Anonymous said...

Dnise G said:

"The ego and accompanying narcissim is massaged in these tiny worlds by those the sufferer considers to be his inferior, but it is never more than a temporary salve, for the sufferer cannot get himself to believe that he is any less than he thinks he is, and swells with resentment that outside his insular circle he is regarded as little more than an untalented whelp, worthy of nought but the deepest contempt.

Thus it is that the sufferer is impelled to take the argument in favour of his own perceived greatness to those who remain implacably unimpressed. He cannot help himself, for the twin curses of his ego and his narcissim tell him that he is by far the most clever fellow he knowns, and as such easily capable of getting one over on the lesser minds which have - unfathomably - neglected to fawn before the majesty of his cod-intellect."

Methinks the lady doth protest too much. It seems that Lee Barnes has found himself a covert fan. It reminds me of the times at school when if someone fancied you and were too shy to say so, they'd try and get your attention by being nasty to you or berating you to your friends.

I think our dear friend Denise cannot admit her love and affection for Mr Barnes and has to "prove her love by posting up psychobabble to try and capture the attentions of her chosen love.

I actually checked out Lee Barnes blog at www.leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com to see why Denise G felt that she had to go overboard in exprtessing her affection for Mr Barnes. This is what he says about the matter:

"Denise G obviously has some issues. The fact she spends time writing about me on her blog and attempting an analysis ( via psycho-babble cod psychology) is obviously due to her sublimating either her sexuality ( and her overwhelming sexual desire for me as she has seen pictures of my hauntingly handsome visage on the internet - Its ok Denise to lust after me - you cannot help it as you are female and biologically programmed to be sexually subservient to me ) or some attraction for Nationalism as an ideology."

Mmm, interesting sexual dynamics there, what does Denise say about this?

He also goes on to say:

"Denise 'hates ' me for the following reasons ;

1) She is drawn like the moth to my flame and desires me but loathes herself for her sublimated desires. It must be difficult for her when her enemy is the one person she really wants to fuck. That is why she has this aggressive hatred for me. Just as the poet William Blake wrote in his poem London about how the 'hapless soldiers' sheathed sword leads to war and violence as he cannot have sex with the diseased harlot of the next stanza and directly linked sexual repression with violence - the violence of Denise is directed at me as her desire must never be revealed to herself. Therefore it has to be chanelled by the subconscious into the river bed of hate and vented at the target it Hates/Desires the most. Just as pornography is the shadow of art - hate is the shadow of sublimated desire. "

Now we are really touching the void here of transcendance. Will Denise G stand up and announce her infatuation with Barnes, a marriage of Left and Right, a synthesis of political ideology, or will we seea quickie divorce?

Anonymous said...

A few years ago Lee Barnes sent a
highly offensive email to a BNP member after this member had threatened to sue the BNP due to failing to stop an Organiser's bullying tactics. You know who you are you big fat twat. Lee Barnes was reported both to the Police and to his internet provider. The ugly tosser's email account was disabled and if he had sent another email he would have been prosecuted for harassment. RESULT!
And by the way, the fact that
two-faced Lecomber handed the original complaint to Barnes for his so-called legal opinion caused this unpleasantness to occur in the first place.

Anonymous said...

Don't be too hard on Lecomber as I understand that his wife had cervical cancer at the time. Bring on the proposed vaccination for schoolgirls - catching herpes at an early age is linked to this terrible disease.

Anonymous said...

The comment about cancer and venereal disease suits the topic of Lee Barnes to a tee.
Good on you Anonymous for nearly getting Barnes prosecuted!